Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
180
EXHIBITS re 179 Notice (Other),,, Exhibits to Joint Notice of Refiling of Documents Accompanying Class Certification Briefs and Evidentiary Objections filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 26 (Unredacted), # 2 Exhibit 27 (Redacted), # 3 Exhibit 28 (Redacted), # 4 Exhibit 29 (Unredacted), # 5 Exhibit 30 (Redacted), # 6 Exhibit 31 (Redacted), # 7 Exhibit 32 (Redacted), # 8 Exhibit 33 (Unredacted), # 9 Exhibit 34 (Redacted), # 10 Exhibit 35 (Unredacted), # 11 Exhibit 36 (Unredacted), # 12 Exhibit 37 (Redacted), # 13 Exhibit 38 (Unredacted), # 14 Exhibit 39 (Unredacted), # 15 Exhibit 40 (Unredacted), # 16 Exhibit 41 (Unredacted), # 17 Exhibit 42 (Redacted), # 18 Exhibit 43 (Redacted), # 19 Exhibit 44 (Redacted), # 20 Exhibit 45 (Redacted), # 21 Exhibit 46 (Redacted), # 22 Exhibit 47 (Redacted), # 23 Exhibit 48 (Redacted), # 24 Exhibit 49 (Unredacted), # 25 Exhibit 50 (Unredacted))(Related document(s) 179 ) (Chorba, Christopher) (Filed on 3/28/2016)
EXHIBIT 8
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
OAKLAND DIVISION
4
5
MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL HURLEY, )
6
and DAVID SHADPOUR,
7
8
9
Plaintiffs,
vs.
)
) Case No.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
10
11
)
) C 13-05996 PJH
Defendant.
)
_________________________________ )
12
13
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
14
15
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF ALEX HIMEL
16
Palo Alto, California
17
February 4, 2016
18
Volume I
19
20
21
Reported by:
22
KELLI COMBS, CSR No. 7705
23
JOB No. 2224922
24
25
PAGES 1 - 266
Page 1
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
Journal article was published.
2
BY MR. RUDOLPH:
3
Q
But after the article was published.
4
A
7:16:38PM
After the article was published, it was a
5
few days later that we removed the feature, and
6
so -- or we changed the way the feature works, and
7
so it would have been surprising to hear sentiment
8
after we changed the way the feature worked.
9
10
Q
12
And -- and -- and what did you change with
respect to how the feature worked?
11
7:16:49PM
MR. JESSEN:
7:17:13PM
Objection; asked and
answered.
13
THE WITNESS:
As we've gone over in detail
14
previously today, the change that was made in
15
October of 2012 was to no longer include the
16
share_count field as part of the counter next to the
17
social plug-in.
18
BY MR. RUDOLPH:
19
Q
7:17:23PM
So when I asked a little bit earlier, "Did
20
you ever hear of Facebook users contacting Facebook
21
to complain about this practice?" you said, "The
22
first time I personally heard about this was around
23
the time that this Wall Street Journal article was
24
published."
25
What -- what do you mean by "this"?
7:17:56PM
7:18:10PM
Page 251
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
2
3
I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand
Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify:
That the foregoing proceedings were taken
4
before me at the time and place herein set forth; that
5
any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to
6
testifying, were administered an oath; that a record of
7
the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand
8
which was thereafter transcribed under my direction;
9
that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the
10
11
testimony given.
Further, that the foregoing pertains to the
12
original transcript of a deposition in a Federal Case,
13
before completion of the proceedings, a review of the
14
transcript [ ] was [X] was not requested.
15
I further certify I am neither financially
16
interested in the action nor a relative or employee of
17
any attorney or any party to this action.
18
19
20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date
subscribed my name.
Dated: 2/8/2016
21
22
23
<%signature%>
24
KELLI COMBS
25
CSR No. 7705
Page 266
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?