Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 180

EXHIBITS re 179 Notice (Other),,, Exhibits to Joint Notice of Refiling of Documents Accompanying Class Certification Briefs and Evidentiary Objections filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 26 (Unredacted), # 2 Exhibit 27 (Redacted), # 3 Exhibit 28 (Redacted), # 4 Exhibit 29 (Unredacted), # 5 Exhibit 30 (Redacted), # 6 Exhibit 31 (Redacted), # 7 Exhibit 32 (Redacted), # 8 Exhibit 33 (Unredacted), # 9 Exhibit 34 (Redacted), # 10 Exhibit 35 (Unredacted), # 11 Exhibit 36 (Unredacted), # 12 Exhibit 37 (Redacted), # 13 Exhibit 38 (Unredacted), # 14 Exhibit 39 (Unredacted), # 15 Exhibit 40 (Unredacted), # 16 Exhibit 41 (Unredacted), # 17 Exhibit 42 (Redacted), # 18 Exhibit 43 (Redacted), # 19 Exhibit 44 (Redacted), # 20 Exhibit 45 (Redacted), # 21 Exhibit 46 (Redacted), # 22 Exhibit 47 (Redacted), # 23 Exhibit 48 (Redacted), # 24 Exhibit 49 (Unredacted), # 25 Exhibit 50 (Unredacted))(Related document(s) 179 ) (Chorba, Christopher) (Filed on 3/28/2016)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 8 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 OAKLAND DIVISION 4 5 MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL HURLEY, ) 6 and DAVID SHADPOUR, 7 8 9 Plaintiffs, vs. ) ) Case No. FACEBOOK, INC., 10 11 ) ) C 13-05996 PJH Defendant. ) _________________________________ ) 12 13 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 14 15 VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF ALEX HIMEL 16 Palo Alto, California 17 February 4, 2016 18 Volume I 19 20 21 Reported by: 22 KELLI COMBS, CSR No. 7705 23 JOB No. 2224922 24 25 PAGES 1 - 266 Page 1 Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 1 Journal article was published. 2 BY MR. RUDOLPH: 3 Q But after the article was published. 4 A 7:16:38PM After the article was published, it was a 5 few days later that we removed the feature, and 6 so -- or we changed the way the feature works, and 7 so it would have been surprising to hear sentiment 8 after we changed the way the feature worked. 9 10 Q 12 And -- and -- and what did you change with respect to how the feature worked? 11 7:16:49PM MR. JESSEN: 7:17:13PM Objection; asked and answered. 13 THE WITNESS: As we've gone over in detail 14 previously today, the change that was made in 15 October of 2012 was to no longer include the 16 share_count field as part of the counter next to the 17 social plug-in. 18 BY MR. RUDOLPH: 19 Q 7:17:23PM So when I asked a little bit earlier, "Did 20 you ever hear of Facebook users contacting Facebook 21 to complain about this practice?" you said, "The 22 first time I personally heard about this was around 23 the time that this Wall Street Journal article was 24 published." 25 What -- what do you mean by "this"? 7:17:56PM 7:18:10PM Page 251 Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 1 2 3 I, the undersigned, a Certified Shorthand Reporter of the State of California, do hereby certify: That the foregoing proceedings were taken 4 before me at the time and place herein set forth; that 5 any witnesses in the foregoing proceedings, prior to 6 testifying, were administered an oath; that a record of 7 the proceedings was made by me using machine shorthand 8 which was thereafter transcribed under my direction; 9 that the foregoing transcript is a true record of the 10 11 testimony given. Further, that the foregoing pertains to the 12 original transcript of a deposition in a Federal Case, 13 before completion of the proceedings, a review of the 14 transcript [ ] was [X] was not requested. 15 I further certify I am neither financially 16 interested in the action nor a relative or employee of 17 any attorney or any party to this action. 18 19 20 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have this date subscribed my name. Dated: 2/8/2016 21 22 23 <%signature%> 24 KELLI COMBS 25 CSR No. 7705 Page 266 Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?