Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
180
EXHIBITS re 179 Notice (Other),,, Exhibits to Joint Notice of Refiling of Documents Accompanying Class Certification Briefs and Evidentiary Objections filed byFacebook Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 26 (Unredacted), # 2 Exhibit 27 (Redacted), # 3 Exhibit 28 (Redacted), # 4 Exhibit 29 (Unredacted), # 5 Exhibit 30 (Redacted), # 6 Exhibit 31 (Redacted), # 7 Exhibit 32 (Redacted), # 8 Exhibit 33 (Unredacted), # 9 Exhibit 34 (Redacted), # 10 Exhibit 35 (Unredacted), # 11 Exhibit 36 (Unredacted), # 12 Exhibit 37 (Redacted), # 13 Exhibit 38 (Unredacted), # 14 Exhibit 39 (Unredacted), # 15 Exhibit 40 (Unredacted), # 16 Exhibit 41 (Unredacted), # 17 Exhibit 42 (Redacted), # 18 Exhibit 43 (Redacted), # 19 Exhibit 44 (Redacted), # 20 Exhibit 45 (Redacted), # 21 Exhibit 46 (Redacted), # 22 Exhibit 47 (Redacted), # 23 Exhibit 48 (Redacted), # 24 Exhibit 49 (Unredacted), # 25 Exhibit 50 (Unredacted))(Related document(s) 179 ) (Chorba, Christopher) (Filed on 3/28/2016)
EXHIBIT 11
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
MATTHEW W. CAMPBELL and
)
5
MICHAEL HURLEY, on behalf
)
of themselves and all
)
6
others similarly situated, )
7
vs.
)
Civil Action No.
)
8
Plaintiffs,
4:13-cv-05996-PJH
)
)
9
FACEBOOK, INC.,
)
Defendant.
10
11
)
___________________________
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
12
13
VIDEOTAPED DEPOSITION OF DR. CATHERINE TUCKER,
14
called as a witness on behalf of the Plaintiffs,
15
pursuant to the applicable provisions of
16
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
17
before Jeanette N. Maracas, Registered
18
Professional Reporter and Notary
19
Public in and for the Commonwealth of
20
Massachusetts, at the Offices of Analysis
21
Group, 111 Huntington Avenue, Boston,
22
Massachusetts, on Tuesday, January 26, 2016,
23
commencing at 11:05 a.m.
24
Job No. 2221467
25
Pages 1 - 188
Page 1
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
as it does to assets?
2
but...
3
A.
I assume it does,
So my testimony, as in this report, relates
4
to the fundamentals affecting why I think
5
that Mr. Torres's approach to valuation is
6
not -- has flaws.
7
Q.
I understand, but I probably wasn't clear.
8
In a professional context, have you ever been
9
retained to value an intangible asset?
10
11
MR. CHORBA:
A.
Asked and answered.
So I have provided testimony relating to the
12
valuation of IP, but I have not actually gone
13
and valued it.
14
Q.
And that's -- and have you done that -- have
15
you done that in any context, academic,
16
professional or otherwise, valued an
17
intangible asset?
18
A.
Actually gone out and built an Excel
19
spreadsheet?
20
not -- that's something that you would employ
21
someone else to do.
22
Q.
Understand.
No.
As I say, that would be
I'm not -- I understand.
I want
23
to turn to Paragraph 94 on Page 41 in which
24
you write about Mr. Torres's work and
25
research and development costs specifically.
Page 176
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
included.
2
them, then that would change his valuation.
3
Q.
And if we were, indeed, to include
But is it your testimony that one should
4
always include those R&D expenses in the way
5
that you set out in your report?
6
MR. CHORBA:
7
8
Objection, misstates
her testimony.
A.
9
So I am -- I think you are attributing to me
a slightly stronger opinion than I have
10
because all I'm saying is that there is at
11
least a question mark for me over Mr.
12
Torres's claim that it is an accepted
13
valuation practice to exclude research and
14
development expenditures.
15
Now, as you know, even before we get
16
to this more detail-oriented point, there's a
17
lot of issues I have with it before we get
18
here, but it does seem to me that there is a
19
question mark over whether or not research
20
and development expenses should be included.
21
Q.
Just to round this off, other than the
22
textbook that you cite to in Footnote 103, do
23
you have any other source for this statement
24
or any personal expertise to support this
25
statement?
Page 181
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS)
SUFFOLK, SS. )
I, Jeanette Maracas, Registered
Professional Reporter and Notary Public in
and for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, do
hereby certify that there came before me on
the 26th day of January, 2016, at 11:05 a.m.,
the person hereinbefore named, who was by me
duly sworn to testify to the truth and
nothing but the truth of his knowledge
touching and concerning the matters in
controversy in this cause; that he was
thereupon examined upon his oath, and his
examination reduced to typewriting under my
direction; and that the deposition is a true
record of the testimony given by the witness.
I further certify that I am neither
attorney or counsel for, nor related to or
employed by, any attorney or counsel employed
by the parties hereto or financially
interested in the action.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto
set my hand this 4th day of February, 2016.
<%signature%>
Notary Public
My commission expires 8/14/20
Page 188
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?