USA v. Goldston et al
Filing
65
ORDER approving 62 Stipulation between First Pinkston, LP, Gunnison County and the United States. By Judge Raymond P. Moore on 12/23/2014. (Attachments: # 1 stipulation)(tscha, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Raymond P. Moore
Civil Action No. 13–cv–01565–RM–KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
DAVID W. GOLDSTON, individually and as Trustee
of Old Times Holding Trust and Trustee of High Mountain Holding Trust;
NANCY S. GOLDSTON, individually and as Trustee
of Old Times Holding Trust and Trustee of High Mountain Holding Trust;
JANET SENNEKER;
JAMES SENNEKER;
W.W. INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC, as
Trustee of Old Times Holding Trust and
Trustee of High Mountain Holding Trust;
FIRST PINKSTON L.P.; and
GUNNISON COUNTY,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER RE STIPULATION BETWEEN
THE UNITED STATES, FIRST PINKSTON L.P. AND GUNNISON COUNTY
(ECF NO. 62)
______________________________________________________________________________
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Stipulation Between the United States, First
Pinkston L.P. and Gunnison County (ECF No. 62) which the parties thereto (“Parties”) request
be approved and made an order of this Court. In the Stipulation, the Parties agreed to the relative
priority of their respective interests in what is known as “Lot 2.” In addition, among other
things, in paragraph 17 of the Stipulation, Defendant First Pinkson L.P. “stipulates to entry of
judgment foreclosing the federal tax liens on Lot 2….” (ECF No. 62, page 5.) The Court has
stricken this language as is unclear whether the parties intend for the Stipulation to also act as a
form of judgment as to Lot 2. To the extent it does, the Stipulation is insufficient to constitute or
approve as a judgment. Accordingly, the Court construes the Stipulation to also include First
Pinkston’s agreement to stipulate to an entry of judgment foreclosing the federal tax liens on Lot
2 if and when papers are filed with the Court seeking such relief.
In accordance with the foregoing, the Stipulation (ECF No. 62) is APPROVED AND SO
ORDERED except as to paragraph 17, as stated herein and as reflected in the attached
Stipulation.
DATED this 23rd day of December, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
____________________________________
RAYMOND P. MOORE
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?