UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AT&T INC. et al

Filing 34

MOTION to Intervene by GOOGLE INC. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support, # 2 Motion for Additional Relief, # 3 Memorandum in Support of Motion for Additional Relief, # 4 Declaration, # 5 Exhibit A, # 6 Exhibit B, # 7 Exhibit C, # 8 Exhibit D, # 9 Exhibit E, # 10 Exhibit F, # 11 Exhibit G)(znmw, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/27/2011: # 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (znmw, ).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT A 9/22/11 WASHINGTONPT A14 Page 1 9/22/11 Wash. Post (Wash., D.C.) A14 2011 WLNR 18940621 Washington Post, The (Washington, D.C.) Copyright 2011 The Washington Post September 22, 2011 Issue DAILY Section: Main (A Section) AT& T, T-Mobile score inU.S. court Cecilia Kang A federal judge Wednesday granted small wins to AT& T and T-Mobile in the first hearing of the Justice Department's lawsuit to block the companies' $39 billion mega-wireless merger. Judge Ellen Huvelle of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia set a Feb. 13 trial date - earlier than Justice requested - and declined for now rival Sprint Nextel's request to join the suit, which would have complicated the proceedings. The decisions take some pressure off AT&T as it works to avoid steep penalties if the deal isn't completed by September 2012. By leaving Sprint out of Justice's case, AT&T and T-Mobile won't have to deal with new arguments from a rival to block the deal. And if a settlement is reached out of court, the companies won't have to deal with more opponents, analysts said. Huvelle said Sprint's participation would prolong the trial, which she said would last four to six weeks. And she acknowledged the business constraints facing the companies if litigation runs long. "It's in no one's interest to be overwhelmed" by the process, Huvelle told a courtroom packed with reporters, antitrust lawyers and federal officials. AT&T has argued that the trial date is significant because of key deadlines in the merger contract. If the deal isn't completed by September 2012, AT&T would have to hand over $3 billion in cash and an estimated $3 billion worth of spectrum and fees to T-Mobile's parent, Deutsche Telekom. "We need to have the cloud of uncertainty removed," said AT&T lawyer Mark Hansen. "We're already a month beyond where we want to be." AT&T said the company is still interested in a settlement as it prepares for trial. "We are hopeful that we can reach a solution with the DOJ that addresses their concerns, but if not, we will be well © 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. 9/22/11 WASHINGTONPT A14 Page 2 prepared for trial," the company said in an e-mailed statement. But a person familiar with Justice's thinking said government officials will find it difficult to reach a compromise that allays its concerns that the merger violates antitrust laws by overly concentrating national and local markets. Justice's acting antitrust head, Sharis Pozen, has said the "door is open" to discussions with the firms. But a person who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the ongoing litigation said it appeared that federal officials were fully preparing to litigate the case. Justice has said the deal, which would combine the second- and fourth-largest carriers, would lead to higher cellphone prices and fewer consumer options. kangc@washpost.com ---- INDEX REFERENCES --COMPANY: SPRINT NEXTEL CORP; SPRINT; SPRINT SP ZOO; JUSTICE; JUSTICE DEPARTMENT NEWS SUBJECT: (Legal (1LE33); Antitrust Regulatory (1AN52); Mergers & Acquisitions (1ME39); Monopolies (1MO68); Major Corporations (1MA93); Economics & Trade (1EC26); Corporate Groups & Ownership (1XO09); Business Litigation (1BU04); Corporate Events (1CR05); Government Litigation (1GO18); Regulatory Affairs (1RE51); Business Management (1BU42); Business Lawsuits & Settlements (1BU19)) INDUSTRY: (Electronics (1EL16); Telecom Regulatory (1TE65); Telecom Carriers & Operators (1TE56); Consumer Electronics Regulatory (1CO18); Mobile Phones & Pagers (1WI07); Consumer Products & Services (1CO62); Consumer Electronics (1CO61); Telecom (1TE27); Telecom Consumer Equipment (1TE03)) REGION: (Americas (1AM92); USA (1US73); North America (1NO39)) Language: EN OTHER INDEXING: (DOJ; JUSTICE; JUSTICE DEPARTMENT; SPRINT; SPRINT NEXTEL; US DISTRICT COURT) (Deutsche Telekom; Ellen Huvelle; Huvelle; Mark Hansen; Sharis Pozen) EDITION: SU Word Count: 421 9/22/11 WASHINGTONPT A14 END OF DOCUMENT © 2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?