NOKIA CORPORATION v. APPLE INC.

Filing 1

MOTION to Quash (filing fee $39, receipt number 461603897) by APPLE INC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Byron L. Pickard, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19)(smm) Modified on 5/20/2011 (smm).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

IN RE THIRD PARTY SUBPOENAS AD
TESTIFICANDUM

Case No.

Nokia Corporation,
Plaintiff
V.

I

Case No. District Delaware
00791 -GMS

Apple Inc.,
Defendant.

DECLARATION OF BYRON L. PICKARD, ESQ. IN SUPPORT OF NONPARTIES’
MOTION TO QUASH NOKIA SUBPOENAS AND FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER
I, Byron L. Pickard, declare as follows:
I am an attorney with Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC ("SKGF"), counsel
for nonparties Robert Greene Sterne, Glenn Perry, Rich Coller and Salvador Bezos (collectively,
the "Apple Attorneys") for the purpose of responding to subpoenas issued by Nokia, Inc., the
Plaintiff in the above-captioned action. This declaration is based upon my personal knowledge
or upon publicly available information that I have either reviewed or become aware of in the
course of this litigation.
2.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March

24, 2011, directed to Robert G. Sterne, an attorney with SKGF.
3.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March

24, 2011, directed to Glenn J. Perry, an attorney with SKGF.

4.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March

24, 2011, directed to Richard D. Coller III, an attorney with SKGF.
5.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a subpoena dated March

24, 2011, directed to Salvador M. Bezos, an attorney with SKGF.
6.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter from Byron L.

Pickard to Rohan Kale, dated April 8, 2011.
7.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of an email from Rohan

Kale to Byron L. Pickard, dated April 14, 2011.
8.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of an email exchange

between Rohan Kale and Byron Pickard, dated May 5, 2011.
9.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of an Ex Pane

Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No.
10.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of an Ex Porte

Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No.
11.

90/010,964, dated January 5, 2011,

90/010,967, dated February 8, 2011.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of an

Ex Porte

Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No. 90/010,965, dated December 21, 2011.
12.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of an

Reexamination Interview Summary for Application No.
13.

Ex Parte

90/010,966, dated April 11, 2011.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Statement of

Substance of the Ex Pane Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,964.
14.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Statement of

Substance of the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,967.

15.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of Apples Statements of

Substance of the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,965.
16.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of Apple’s Statement of

Substance of the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 95/010,966.
17.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide

presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/010,964.
18.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide

presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/010,967.
19.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 18 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide

presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/0 10,965.
20.

Attached hereto as Exhibit 19 is a true and correct copy of the detailed slide

presentation used during the Ex Parte Reexamination Interview for Application No. 90/010,966.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief. Executed this
17th day of May, 2011, in Washington, D.C.

Byron L. Pickard

STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & Fox PLLC
1100 New York Avenue, NW
Washington DC 20005