AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.
Filing
164
REPLY in support of motion re #163 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.), #120 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.. (Attachments: #1 [Redacted] Declaration of Matthew Becker, #2 [Redacted] Consolidated List of Exhibits, #3 [Redacted] Response to Supplemental Statement of Facts, #4 [Redacted] Response to Statement of Disputed Facts, #5 Supplemental Objections to Evidence, #6 Response to Evidentiary Objections, #7 Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Supplemental Declaration of Carl Malamud, #9 Exhibit 1, #10 Exhibit 2, #11 Exhibit 3, #12 Exhibit 4, #13 Exhibit 5, #14 Exhibit 6, #15 Exhibit [Redacted] 7, #16 Exhibit 8, #17 Exhibit 9, #18 Exhibit [Redacted] 10, #19 Exhibit [Redacted] 11, #20 Exhibit 12, #21 Exhibit 13, #22 Exhibit 14, #23 Exhibit 15, #24 Exhibit 16, #25 Exhibit 17)(Bridges, Andrew) Modified text on 2/5/2016 (ztd).
EXHIBIT 3
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
3
Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC
4
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR
)
5
TESTING AND MATERIALS,
)
6
d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL;
)
7
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
)
8
ASSOCIATION, INC.; and
)
9
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF
)
10
HEATING, REFRIGERATION AND
)
11
AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS,
)
12
Plaintiffs and
)
Counter-Defendants,
)
13
vs.
)
14
PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG,INC.,
)
15
16
Defendant and
)
Counter-Plaintiff.
17
VIDEOTAPED 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION
18
OF DONALD P. BLISS, taken before Jeanette
19
N. Maracas, Registered Professional Reporter
20
and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth
21
of Massachusetts, at 42 Chauncy Street, Boston,
22
Massachusetts, on Tuesday, March 3, 2015,
23
commencing at 9:10 a.m.
24
25
PAGES 1 - 244
Page 1
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
1 A. That's the standard for criteria for
12:30:10
1
and standards and not documents that are
12:33:58
2
considered guidelines or recommended
12:34:00
at a fire scene, guidance on the preservation 12:30:21
3
practices, then no.
4
of evidence, preparation of reports,
4 Q. What guidelines or recommended practice
5
determining the source or origin of a fire.
2
conducting an origin and cause investigation
3
12:30:17
12:30:23
12:30:28
6 Q. It set out some method for them to bring
7
to their investigation of the fire?
8 A. Yes.
12:30:37
11
activities of the fire investigation?
12:30:44
12:31:00
12:31:24
12:31:30
consistency with how all of our fire
16
investigations were performed because it's
17
a standard or best practice to ensure that
18
the key elements of an investigation were
19
adhered to consistent with their training,
20
their education, their knowledge.
12:31:45
12:31:55
25
12:34:59
being adopted as a regulation or a law?
12:35:01
16
MR. REHN: Objection as to form.
18
that they may be adopted as a regulation
or a law.
12:35:17
It sounded as though you were distinguishing
12:35:22
between guidelines and recommended practices, 12:35:26
on the one hand, and some other parts of
24
12:32:11
1 Q. Do you know how many standards or codes
2
codes and standards, correct?
25 A. Yes.
into law?
12:32:15
NFPA publishes that have not been adopted
3
12:32:29
12:32:34
12:32:38
5 Q. Do you know how many codes or standards
would consider to be current versions? By
that question I want you to exclude earlier
versions.
12:32:39
NFPA has published that are now what you
9
10 A. I don't know.
12 A. No.
12:32:43
12:32:51
12:32:55
12:32:57
12:33:01
11 Q. Can you give an estimate?
12:33:02
12:33:05
13 Q. Are you aware of any NFA (sic) codes or
14
law?
12:33:05
standards that have not been adopted into
15
12:33:10
12:33:13
16 A. I couldn't speculate one way or the other,
17
so the answer, no.
12:33:13
12:33:35
18 Q. I think I misspoke in my earlier question.
12:33:38
19
I said NFA, but you understood that question
20
to be NFPA?
21 A. Yes.
12:33:42
12:33:45
12:33:46
22 Q. So you're not aware, as you sit here, of
23
any NFPA codes or standards that have not
24
been adopted into law?
12:33:46
12:33:49
12:33:52
25 A. If you're specifically referring to codes
12:35:11
12:35:15
23
12:32:09
8
12:35:07
22
12:32:11
7
12:35:05
21
12:32:07
6
12:34:51
or codes are written for the purposes of
Page 106
4 A. No.
12:34:45
12:34:48
20 Q. Your previous answer referred to purposes.
12:32:04
MR. REHN: Object as to form.
written for the purposes of being adopted
as a regulation or a law.
12:34:37
12:34:39
19
12:32:02
investigations?
24 A. Yes.
they're not in written, specifically not
17 A. The standards are written in such a fashion
12:31:58
21 Q. So it provided a consistent process for
23
9 A. To my knowledge, none of them because
10
15
12:31:41
the fire investigators to follow in their
12:34:33
14
12:31:37
22
12:34:32
may call for a legal conclusion.
13 Q. Whereas the other parts of the standards
14 A. One of the things that it provided was
15
12:34:29
12
12:31:21
12:34:26
MR. REHN: Objection as to form,
11
12:31:15
MR. REHN: Object as to form. It's
pretty vague.
law or adopted into law?
8
perhaps how NFPA 921 contributed to the
13
6
12:34:03
documents have not been incorporated into
7
12:30:44
9 Q. Can you explain to me with some examples
12
5
12:30:39
10
12:34:02
12:33:56
12:35:43
12:35:52
12:35:55
Page 108
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Q. What would you call the parts of standards
12:35:55
that are not guidelines or recommended
12:35:58
practices?
12:36:00
MR. REHN: Objection as to form,
12:36:03
vague.
12:36:08
A. I was just trying to clarify that a
12:36:08
recommended practice or a guideline, even
12:36:13
though it has a NFPA number, is not a
12:36:13
standard.
12:36:17
Q. I understand your statement on that, but
12:36:22
you were distinguishing the purpose of the
12:36:26
recommended guidelines -- sorry, of the
12:36:28
guidelines and recommended practices from
12:36:31
the purpose of other parts of these
12:36:35
documents, is that correct?
12:36:39
MR. REHN: I believe that
12:36:40
mischaracterizes the testimony. I object
12:36:41
on that basis.
12:36:44
MR. BRIDGES: I'm happy for him
12:36:46
to straighten me out because I want to
12:36:49
understand the distinction.
12:36:51
A. The recommended practice or the guideline
12:36:55
is exactly what the category designation
12:36:57
implies, that it's a guidance document, not 12:37:02
an enforceable or a -- it doesn't reach the 12:37:08
Page 107
Page 109
28 (Pages 106 - 109)
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
1
this is the end of Tape No. 4.
2
MR. REHN: 6:02.
3
VIDEOGRAPHER: 6:02, excuse me. We
4
5
6
are now off the record.
(Whereupon the deposition was
06:01:55
06:01:57
06:01:57
06:02:00
1
2
3
4
5
06:02:03
6
concluded at 6:02 p.m.)
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
11
10
12
13
11
12
14
13
15
14
16
15
16
17
18
19
17
18
19
20
21
20
21
22
23
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS)
SUFFOLK, SS. )
I, Jeanette Maracas, Registered
Professional Reporter and Notary Public in
and for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, do
hereby certify that there came before me on
the 3rd day of March, 2015, at 9:10 a.m., the
person hereinbefore named, who was by me duly
sworn to testify to the truth and nothing but
the truth of his knowledge touching and
concerning the matters in controversy in this
cause; that he was thereupon examined upon
his oath, and his examination reduced to
typewriting under my direction; and that the
deposition is a true record of the testimony
given by the witness.
I further certify that I am neither
attorney or counsel for, nor related to or
employed by, any attorney or counsel employed
by the parties hereto or financially
interested in the action.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto
set my hand this 9th day of March, 2015.
Notary Public
My commission expires 8/14/20
22
23
24
25
24
25
Page 242
Page 244
1
I declare under penalty of perjury
2 under the laws that the foregoing is
3 true and correct.
4
5
Executed on _________________ , 20___,
6 at _____________, ___________________________.
7
8
9
10
11
_____________________________
12
Donald Bliss
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Page 243
62 (Pages 242 - 244)
Veritext Legal Solutions
866 299-5127
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?