AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 164

REPLY in support of motion re #163 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.), #120 SEALED MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC. (This document is SEALED and only available to authorized persons.) filed by PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.. (Attachments: #1 [Redacted] Declaration of Matthew Becker, #2 [Redacted] Consolidated List of Exhibits, #3 [Redacted] Response to Supplemental Statement of Facts, #4 [Redacted] Response to Statement of Disputed Facts, #5 Supplemental Objections to Evidence, #6 Response to Evidentiary Objections, #7 Supplemental Request for Judicial Notice, #8 Supplemental Declaration of Carl Malamud, #9 Exhibit 1, #10 Exhibit 2, #11 Exhibit 3, #12 Exhibit 4, #13 Exhibit 5, #14 Exhibit 6, #15 Exhibit [Redacted] 7, #16 Exhibit 8, #17 Exhibit 9, #18 Exhibit [Redacted] 10, #19 Exhibit [Redacted] 11, #20 Exhibit 12, #21 Exhibit 13, #22 Exhibit 14, #23 Exhibit 15, #24 Exhibit 16, #25 Exhibit 17)(Bridges, Andrew) Modified text on 2/5/2016 (ztd).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 3 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 3 Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-01215-TSC 4 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR ) 5 TESTING AND MATERIALS, ) 6 d/b/a ASTM INTERNATIONAL; ) 7 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ) 8 ASSOCIATION, INC.; and ) 9 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ) 10 HEATING, REFRIGERATION AND ) 11 AIR CONDITIONING ENGINEERS, ) 12 Plaintiffs and ) Counter-Defendants, ) 13 vs. ) 14 PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG,INC., ) 15 16 Defendant and ) Counter-Plaintiff. 17 VIDEOTAPED 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION 18 OF DONALD P. BLISS, taken before Jeanette 19 N. Maracas, Registered Professional Reporter 20 and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth 21 of Massachusetts, at 42 Chauncy Street, Boston, 22 Massachusetts, on Tuesday, March 3, 2015, 23 commencing at 9:10 a.m. 24 25 PAGES 1 - 244 Page 1 Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127 1 A. That's the standard for criteria for 12:30:10 1 and standards and not documents that are 12:33:58 2 considered guidelines or recommended 12:34:00 at a fire scene, guidance on the preservation 12:30:21 3 practices, then no. 4 of evidence, preparation of reports, 4 Q. What guidelines or recommended practice 5 determining the source or origin of a fire. 2 conducting an origin and cause investigation 3 12:30:17 12:30:23 12:30:28 6 Q. It set out some method for them to bring 7 to their investigation of the fire? 8 A. Yes. 12:30:37 11 activities of the fire investigation? 12:30:44 12:31:00 12:31:24 12:31:30 consistency with how all of our fire 16 investigations were performed because it's 17 a standard or best practice to ensure that 18 the key elements of an investigation were 19 adhered to consistent with their training, 20 their education, their knowledge. 12:31:45 12:31:55 25 12:34:59 being adopted as a regulation or a law? 12:35:01 16 MR. REHN: Objection as to form. 18 that they may be adopted as a regulation or a law. 12:35:17 It sounded as though you were distinguishing 12:35:22 between guidelines and recommended practices, 12:35:26 on the one hand, and some other parts of 24 12:32:11 1 Q. Do you know how many standards or codes 2 codes and standards, correct? 25 A. Yes. into law? 12:32:15 NFPA publishes that have not been adopted 3 12:32:29 12:32:34 12:32:38 5 Q. Do you know how many codes or standards would consider to be current versions? By that question I want you to exclude earlier versions. 12:32:39 NFPA has published that are now what you 9 10 A. I don't know. 12 A. No. 12:32:43 12:32:51 12:32:55 12:32:57 12:33:01 11 Q. Can you give an estimate? 12:33:02 12:33:05 13 Q. Are you aware of any NFA (sic) codes or 14 law? 12:33:05 standards that have not been adopted into 15 12:33:10 12:33:13 16 A. I couldn't speculate one way or the other, 17 so the answer, no. 12:33:13 12:33:35 18 Q. I think I misspoke in my earlier question. 12:33:38 19 I said NFA, but you understood that question 20 to be NFPA? 21 A. Yes. 12:33:42 12:33:45 12:33:46 22 Q. So you're not aware, as you sit here, of 23 any NFPA codes or standards that have not 24 been adopted into law? 12:33:46 12:33:49 12:33:52 25 A. If you're specifically referring to codes 12:35:11 12:35:15 23 12:32:09 8 12:35:07 22 12:32:11 7 12:35:05 21 12:32:07 6 12:34:51 or codes are written for the purposes of Page 106 4 A. No. 12:34:45 12:34:48 20 Q. Your previous answer referred to purposes. 12:32:04 MR. REHN: Object as to form. written for the purposes of being adopted as a regulation or a law. 12:34:37 12:34:39 19 12:32:02 investigations? 24 A. Yes. they're not in written, specifically not 17 A. The standards are written in such a fashion 12:31:58 21 Q. So it provided a consistent process for 23 9 A. To my knowledge, none of them because 10 15 12:31:41 the fire investigators to follow in their 12:34:33 14 12:31:37 22 12:34:32 may call for a legal conclusion. 13 Q. Whereas the other parts of the standards 14 A. One of the things that it provided was 15 12:34:29 12 12:31:21 12:34:26 MR. REHN: Objection as to form, 11 12:31:15 MR. REHN: Object as to form. It's pretty vague. law or adopted into law? 8 perhaps how NFPA 921 contributed to the 13 6 12:34:03 documents have not been incorporated into 7 12:30:44 9 Q. Can you explain to me with some examples 12 5 12:30:39 10 12:34:02 12:33:56 12:35:43 12:35:52 12:35:55 Page 108 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. What would you call the parts of standards 12:35:55 that are not guidelines or recommended 12:35:58 practices? 12:36:00 MR. REHN: Objection as to form, 12:36:03 vague. 12:36:08 A. I was just trying to clarify that a 12:36:08 recommended practice or a guideline, even 12:36:13 though it has a NFPA number, is not a 12:36:13 standard. 12:36:17 Q. I understand your statement on that, but 12:36:22 you were distinguishing the purpose of the 12:36:26 recommended guidelines -- sorry, of the 12:36:28 guidelines and recommended practices from 12:36:31 the purpose of other parts of these 12:36:35 documents, is that correct? 12:36:39 MR. REHN: I believe that 12:36:40 mischaracterizes the testimony. I object 12:36:41 on that basis. 12:36:44 MR. BRIDGES: I'm happy for him 12:36:46 to straighten me out because I want to 12:36:49 understand the distinction. 12:36:51 A. The recommended practice or the guideline 12:36:55 is exactly what the category designation 12:36:57 implies, that it's a guidance document, not 12:37:02 an enforceable or a -- it doesn't reach the 12:37:08 Page 107 Page 109 28 (Pages 106 - 109) Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127 1 this is the end of Tape No. 4. 2 MR. REHN: 6:02. 3 VIDEOGRAPHER: 6:02, excuse me. We 4 5 6 are now off the record. (Whereupon the deposition was 06:01:55 06:01:57 06:01:57 06:02:00 1 2 3 4 5 06:02:03 6 concluded at 6:02 p.m.) 7 7 8 8 9 9 10 11 10 12 13 11 12 14 13 15 14 16 15 16 17 18 19 17 18 19 20 21 20 21 22 23 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS) SUFFOLK, SS. ) I, Jeanette Maracas, Registered Professional Reporter and Notary Public in and for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, do hereby certify that there came before me on the 3rd day of March, 2015, at 9:10 a.m., the person hereinbefore named, who was by me duly sworn to testify to the truth and nothing but the truth of his knowledge touching and concerning the matters in controversy in this cause; that he was thereupon examined upon his oath, and his examination reduced to typewriting under my direction; and that the deposition is a true record of the testimony given by the witness. I further certify that I am neither attorney or counsel for, nor related to or employed by, any attorney or counsel employed by the parties hereto or financially interested in the action. In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of March, 2015. Notary Public My commission expires 8/14/20 22 23 24 25 24 25 Page 242 Page 244 1 I declare under penalty of perjury 2 under the laws that the foregoing is 3 true and correct. 4 5 Executed on _________________ , 20___, 6 at _____________, ___________________________. 7 8 9 10 11 _____________________________ 12 Donald Bliss 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 243 62 (Pages 242 - 244) Veritext Legal Solutions 866 299-5127

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?