AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 27

Amended MOTION to Compel discovery, privilege log, and further initial disclosures filed by AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Hudis, #2 Exhibit A to Hudis Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Hudis Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Hudis Declaration, #5 Exhibit D to Hudis Declaration, #6 Exhibit E to Hudis Declaration, #7 Exhibit F to Hudis Declaration, #8 Exhibit G to Hudis Declaration, #9 Exhibit H to Hudis Declaration, #10 Exhibit I to Hudis Declaration, #11 Exhibit J to Hudis Declaration, #12 Exhibit K to Hudis Declaration, #13 Exhibit L to Hudis Declaration, #14 Exhibit M to Hudis Declaration, #15 Exhibit N to Hudis Declaration, #16 Exhibit O to Hudis Declaration, #17 Exhibit P to Hudis Declaration, #18 Exhibit Q to Hudis Declaration, #19 Exhibit R to Hudis Declaration, #20 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudis, Jonathan) Modified on 12/16/2014 (td, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., and NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC., Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants, v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 1:14-cv-00857-TSC-DAR DECLARATION OF JONATHAN HUDIS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, PRIVILEGE LOG, AND FOR FURTHER INITIAL DISCLOSURES I, JONATHAN HUDIS, declare: 1. I am a partner with Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, counsel to Plaintiffs, AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. (“AERA”), AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. (“APA”) and NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. (“NCME”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) in the captioned action. I submit this Declaration in support of Plaintiffs’ Amended Motion to compel discovery, privilege log, and for further initial disclosures from Defendant. 2. The parties’ counsel had their meet-and-confer telephone conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on September 25, 2014. 3. The Court’s Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 22] has set the close of fact discovery for March 16, 2015. 4. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit A is a true copy of Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories served by e-mail on Defendant’s counsel on October 1, 2014. 5. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit B is a true copy of Plaintiffs’ First Production Requests served by e-mail on Defendant’s counsel on October 1, 2014. 6. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit C is a true copy of Plaintiffs’ First Admissions Requests served by e-mail on Defendant’s counsel on October 1, 2014. 7. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit D is a true copy of Defendant’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories, served on November 3, 2014. 8. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit E is a true copy of Defendant’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs’ First Production Requests, served on November 3, 2014. 9. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit F is a true copy of Defendant’s Objections and Responses to Plaintiffs’ First Admissions Requests, served on November 3, 2014. 10. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit G is a true copy of Defendant’s Initial Disclosures, served on November 14, 2014. 11. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit H is a true copy of a letter dated November 10, 2014 from me and my partner, Kathleen Cooney-Porter, to Defendant’s counsel. 12. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit I is a true copy of a letter dated November 13, 2014 from Andrew Bridges, Defendant’s counsel. 13. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit J is a true copy of a letter dated November 14, 2014 from me and my partner, Kathleen Cooney-Porter, to Defendant’s counsel. 14. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit K is a true copy of a letter dated November 18, 2014 from me and my partner, Kathleen Cooney-Porter, to Defendant’s counsel. 15. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit L is a true copy of a letter dated November 19, 2014 from Andrew Bridges, Defendant’s counsel. 2 16. The parties’ counsel, on November 20, 2014, participated in a telephone conference to discuss outstanding discovery issues. 17. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit M is a true copy of a letter dated November 21, 2014 from me and my partner, Kathleen Cooney-Porter, to Andrew Bridges, Defendant’s counsel. 18. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit N is a true copy of a letter dated November 24, 2014 from Andrew Bridges, Defendant’s counsel. 19. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit O is a true copy of a letter dated November 25, 2014 from me and my partner, Kathleen Cooney-Porter, to Defendant’s counsel. 20. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit P is a true copy of a letter dated December 19, 2013 from Defendant’s President and Founder, Carl Malamud, to John Neikirk, Director of Publications, AERA. 21. Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit Q is a true copy of the Merriam- Webster Dictionary’s definition of the term “publish” available at www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/publish (last visited on December 11, 2014). 22. Webster Accompanying this Declaration as Exhibit R is a true copy of the MerriamDictionary’s definition of the term “post” available at www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/post (last visited on December 11, 2014). I DECLARE, under the penalty of perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: December 15, 2014 /s/ Jonathan Hudis Jonathan Hudis {431384US, 11395524_1.DOCX} 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?