AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC. et al v. PUBLIC.RESOURCE.ORG, INC.

Filing 27

Amended MOTION to Compel discovery, privilege log, and further initial disclosures filed by AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION, INC., AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC., NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION, INC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jonathan Hudis, #2 Exhibit A to Hudis Declaration, #3 Exhibit B to Hudis Declaration, #4 Exhibit C to Hudis Declaration, #5 Exhibit D to Hudis Declaration, #6 Exhibit E to Hudis Declaration, #7 Exhibit F to Hudis Declaration, #8 Exhibit G to Hudis Declaration, #9 Exhibit H to Hudis Declaration, #10 Exhibit I to Hudis Declaration, #11 Exhibit J to Hudis Declaration, #12 Exhibit K to Hudis Declaration, #13 Exhibit L to Hudis Declaration, #14 Exhibit M to Hudis Declaration, #15 Exhibit N to Hudis Declaration, #16 Exhibit O to Hudis Declaration, #17 Exhibit P to Hudis Declaration, #18 Exhibit Q to Hudis Declaration, #19 Exhibit R to Hudis Declaration, #20 Text of Proposed Order)(Hudis, Jonathan) Modified on 12/16/2014 (td, ).

Download PDF
EXHIBIT O Case No. 1:14-cv-00857-TSC -DAR November 25, 2014 Via E-Mail Andrew P. Bridges, Esq. FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 112th Fl. San Francisco, CA 94104 JONATHAN HUDIS (703) 412-7047 JHUDIS@OBLON.COM KATHLEEN COONEY-PORTER (703) 413-3000 KCOONEY-PORTER@OBLON.COM *BAR OTHER THAN VIRGINIA Re: American Education Research Association, Inc. et al. v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. Civil Action No.: 1:14-cv-00857-TSC Our Ref: 431384US-332060-332060-69-L DMS Dear Andrew: We respond to your letter of November 24, 2014. 1. Definitions for “accessed,” “viewed,” and “downloaded” For purposes of Public Resource providing supplementary responses to Plaintiffs’ outstanding written discovery, we agree with Public Resource’s proposed definitions of “accessed,” “viewed,” and “downloaded” – as noted in your November 24th letter. 2. Definition for “publication” Based on the parties’ exchanges of correspondence and telephone discussions, we continue to disagree on the definition for “publication” as used in Plaintiffs’ written discovery served to date. 3. Supplemental Discovery Responses and Documents The parties have come to agreement on the definitions of most disputed terms used in Plaintiffs’ discovery requests. The parties also have come to an understanding regarding the parameters of a log of withheld materials. On the other hand, we raised numerous discovery issues in our correspondence of November 10, 14, 18 and 21, 2014, and in our telephone discussion had with you on November 20, 2014. Many of these disputed discovery issues remain unresolved. OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. 1940 DUKE STREET „ ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA 22314 „ U.S.A. TELEPHONE: 703-413-3000 „ FACSIMILE: 703-413-2220 „ WWW.OBLON.COM Andrew P. Bridges, Esq. Our Ref. 431384US-332060-332060-69-L DMS Page 2 We therefore look forward to Public Resource providing its supplemental discovery responses, document production, and a privilege log by December 8, 2014. Very truly yours, OBLON, SPIVAK, McCLELLAND, MAIER & NEUSTADT, L.L.P. Jonathan Hudis Kathleen Cooney-Porter JH/jh {11299299_1.DOCX } cc: American Educational Research Association, Inc. American Psychological Association, Inc. National Council on Measurement in Education, Inc. Katherine D. Cappaert, Esq. Counsel of Record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?