STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al

Filing 83

NOTICE Errata re Exhibits in support of 82 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by TIMOTHY F GEITHNER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA L SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (Attachments: # 1 Table of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37, # 39 Exhibit 38, # 40 Exhibit 39, # 41 Exhibit 40, # 42 Exhibit 41, # 43 Exhibit 42, # 44 Exhibit 43) (BECKENHAUER, ERIC)

Download PDF
STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al Doc. 83 Att. 17 Exhibit 16 Dockets.Justia.com Health Reform: Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions © May 2010 by Families USA Foundation Families USA 1201 New York Avenue NW, Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20005 Phone: 202-628-3030 Fax: 202-347-2417 E-mail: info@familiesusa.org This publication is available online at www.familiesusa.org. Cover Design: Nancy Magill, Families USA Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions Introduction I n March, the President signed an historic package of health reforms into law. The new law offers critical protections for the millions of Americans who have pre-existing conditions today--as well as for those who are healthy now but who may develop a health problem as they grow older. As a result of health reform, no American with a pre-existing condition will be denied coverage, charged a higher premium, or sold a policy that excludes coverage of essential health benefits simply because he or she has a pre-existing condition. This report takes a closer look at the number of Americans with diagnosed pre-existing conditions who, absent reform, would be at risk of being denied coverage in the individual insurance market. The uninsured and those who do not have access to job-based coverage are at greatest risk, but even those who now have coverage at work could be at risk if they lose or leave their jobs and have to find coverage in the individual market. To better understand the effect that health reform will have on these people, Families USA commissioned The Lewin Group to quantify the number of Americans who are diagnosed with conditions that commonly lead to denials of coverage. Looking only at those serious conditions that are commonly linked to coverage denials, we found that 57.2 million non-elderly Americans have a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage in today's individual insurance market. That's more than one out of every five people under the age of 65, or 22.4 percent. No group is immune to the effects of this pervasive problem: It affects people in all age groups, every racial and ethnic group, and every income group. All of these people with diagnosed pre-existing conditions are at risk for being denied coverage. Our analysis does not include every condition that may lead to a denial of coverage, nor does it capture every person with a pre-existing condition that would likely result in higher premiums or excluded benefits. Further, this analysis cannot capture the uninsured and underinsured Americans who, lacking a way to pay for care, do not seek treatment and whose health conditions, therefore, remain undiagnosed. Because people with low incomes and racial and ethnic minorities are disproportionately represented among the uninsured and underinsured, they are likely to be undercounted in our analysis. The protections that health reform offers mean that every American will now have greater security and peace of mind, knowing that insurance companies will be required to sell health insurance to all individuals regardless of their health status, to charge them the same premiums rather than making them pay more, and to cover all benefits. These new protections mean that every American will always be able to purchase quality, affordable coverage. Families USA May 2010 2 Health Reform Summary of Methodology This report examines the number of Americans with diagnosed pre-existing conditions who, absent reform, would be at risk of being denied coverage in the individual insurance market. To better understand the magnitude of this problem, Families USA commissioned The Lewin Group to analyze data relating to pre-existing conditions. As described more fully in the Technical Appendix on page 15, The Lewin Group quantified the number of Americans who are diagnosed with health conditions that commonly lead to denials of coverage in today's marketplace. This study's findings are based on data on health conditions from the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and demographic data from the U.S. Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS). This analysis presents the total number of non-elderly, non-institutionalized, non-Medicare-eligible Americans who are diagnosed with pre-existing conditions that commonly lead to a denial of coverage, including those who currently have health insurance but would be at risk if they needed to seek coverage on their own in the individual insurance market. Key Findings One in Five Americans Is at Risk of a Denial of Coverage a Approximately 57.2 million Americans under the age of 65 have a pre-existing condition that, bsent reform, could lead to a denial of coverage by an insurance company (see Table 1). means that, without health reform, more than one in every five non-elderly mericans (22.4 percent) is at risk of being denied coverage. A This Table 1. People under Age 65 Diagnosed with a Pre-Existing Condition that Could Result in a Denial of Coverage Population Under 65* 255,103,000 Population under 65 with a Pre-Existing Condition 57,152,000 Percent of Population under 65 With a Pre-Existing Condition 22.4% * Data are for the non-institutionalized, non-Medicare-eligible population. Source: Estimates based on pre-existing conditions diagnosed or treated in 2007, prepared by The Lewin Group for Families USA (see the Technical Appendix for details). Families USA May 2010 Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions 3 Pre-Existing Conditions: A Problem that Grows with Age c Individuals in every age group are affected by pre-existing conditions that, absent reform, ould lead to a denial of coverage (see Figure 1 and Table 2). However, those who are older are much more likely to have such a condition, as follows: a Nearly one in six young adults ged 18 to 24 (15.9 percent) has a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. a More Figure 1. Percent of Age Group with a Pre-Existing Condition 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0-17 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 6.7% 21.3% 15.9% 26.0% 45.5% 35.3% than one-third of adults ged 45 to 54 (35.3 percent) have a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. 5 More than two in five adults aged 5 to 64 (45.5 percent) have a preexisting condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. Table 2. People under Age 65 Diagnosed with a Pre-Existing Condition that Could Result in a Denial of Coverage, by Age Age Group Number in Age Group* Number in Age Group with a Pre-Existing Condition 4,952,000 4,486,000 8,460,000 10,696,000 14,863,000 13,695,000 57,152,000 Percent of Age Group with a Pre-Existing Condition 6.7% 15.9% 21.3% 26.0% 35.3% 45.5% 22.4% As a Percent of Non-Elderly People with a Pre-Existing Condition 8.7% 7.8% 14.8% 18.7% 26.0% 24.0% 100.0% 0-17 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 Total** 73,793,000 28,298,000 39,667,000 41,167,000 42,085,000 30,092,000 255,103,000 * Data are for the non-institutionalized, non-Medicare-eligible population. ** Numbers do not add to total because of rounding. Source: Estimates based on pre-existing conditions diagnosed or treated in 2007, prepared by The Lewin Group for Families USA (see the Technical Appendix for details). Families USA May 2010 4 Health Reform t Adults aged 45 to 64 account for only 28.3 percent of he non-elderly U.S. population, but they make up fully half (50.0 percent) of those with pre-existing conditions (see Figure 2). a This phenomenon is most pronounced among dults aged 55 to 64. Adults in this age group account for only 11.8 percent of the non-elderly U.S. population, but they make up nearly a quarter (24.0 percent) of those with pre-existing conditions. Figure 2. 28.3% 45- to 64-yearolds as a percent of the non-elderly population 50.0% Children and Young Adults with Pre-Existing Conditions a While 45- to 64-yearolds as a percent of the non-elderly population with pre-existing conditions the percentage of American children and young dults who have a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage is low relative to older Americans, a substantial number of children and young adults are affected. t Nearly 5.0 million children under the age of 18, and 4.5 million young adults aged 18 o 24, have a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. Every Income Group Is Affected c People of every income group have pre-existing conditions that, without health reform, ould lead to a denial of coverage (see Table 3). By income group, we see the following trend: o The lowest-income Americans are the most likely to have such a condition, with nearly ne-quarter (24.2 percent) of individuals in families with incomes below 100 percent of the federal poverty level (less than $22,050 for a family of four in 2010) affected. 1 Approximately 21.9 percent of individuals in families with incomes between 100 and 99 percent of poverty ($22,050-$44,100 for a family of four in 2010) have such a condition. p Approximately 22.2 percent of individuals in families with incomes at or above 200 ercent of poverty (more than $44,100 for a family of four in 2010) have such a condition. c While the lowest-income Americans are slightly more likely to be affected by pre-existing onditions, middle-income and higher-income Americans (those in families earning more than 200 percent of poverty, or $44,100 for a family of four in 2010) make up more than two-thirds (69.8 percent) of those with pre-existing conditions that could lead to a denial of coverage. Families USA May 2010 Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions 5 Table 3. People under Age 65 Diagnosed with a Pre-Existing Condition that Could Result in a Denial of Coverage, by Income Family Income Relative to the Federal Poverty Level <100% 100-199% 200% 200-399% 400% Total** Number in Income Group* 32,832,000 42,653,000 179,618,000 78,291,000 101,326,000 255,103,000 Number in Income Group with a Pre-Existing Condition 7,932,000 9,336,000 39,884,000 17,408,000 22,476,000 57,152,000 Percent of Income Group with a Pre-Existing Condition 24.2% 21.9% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 22.4% As a Percent of NonElderly People with a Pre-Existing Condition 13.9% 16.3% 69.8% 30.5% 39.3% 100.0% * Data are for the non-institutionalized, non-Medicare-eligible population. ** Numbers do not add to total because of rounding. Source: Estimates based on pre-existing conditions diagnosed or treated in 2007, prepared by The Lewin Group for Families USA (see the Technical Appendix for details). Every Racial and Ethnic Group Is Affected c People of every racial and ethnic group have pre-existing conditions that, absent reform, ould lead to a denial of coverage (see Table 4 on page 6). By race and ethnic group, we see the following trend: o American Indians and Alaska Natives are the most likely to be affected, with more than ne-quarter (25.9 percent) having a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. c Approximately one-quarter (24.4 percent) of whites (non-Hispanic) have such a ondition. c Nearly one-quarter (23.4 percent) of African Americans (non-Hispanic) have such a ondition. than one in six Hispanics (16.9 percent) is affected. S More plightly fewer than one in six Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders (14.5 ercent), and just over one in 10 Asian Americans (11.7 percent), have a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. Families USA May 2010 6 Health Reform Table 4. People under Age 65 Diagnosed with a Pre-Existing Condition that Could Result in a Denial of Coverage, by Race or Hispanic Origin Racial or Ethnic Group American Indian/Alaska Native Asian Black, non-Hispanic Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Total** Number in Group* 3,400,000 12,433,000 31,851,000 910,000 42,809,000 163,699,000 255,103,000 Number in Group With a Pre-Existing Condition 880,000 1,454,000 7,452,000 132,000 7,221,000 40,012,000 57,152,000 Percent of Group With a Pre-Existing Condition 25.9% 11.7% 23.4% 14.5% 16.9% 24.4% 22.4% As a Percent of NonElderly People with a Pre-Existing Condition 1.5% 2.5% 13.0% 0.2% 12.6% 70.0% 100.0% * Data are for the non-institutionalized, non-Medicare-eligible population. ** Numbers do not add to total because of rounding. Source: Estimates based on pre-existing conditions diagnosed or treated in 2007, prepared by The Lewin Group for Families USA (see the Technical Appendix for details). Our analysis is based on the number of Americans who are diagnosed with a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. The analysis did not control for disparities in access to care and in the delivery of care that may result in lower rates of diagnosed disease among certain racial and ethnic minority groups. For a more in-depth examination of this point, please see the Discussion below. Discussion Millions of Americans have pre-existing conditions, such as diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. These people will be substantially helped by the new health reform law. Under health reform, insurance companies will no longer be allowed to deny people coverage based on their health status. Equally important, insurance companies will no longer be allowed to charge higher premiums for this coverage or to sell policies that exclude coverage for certain benefits based on a person's pre-existing condition. This study was designed to improve our understanding of how many Americans have preexisting conditions that could lead to a denial of coverage by an insurance company if there were no protections for people with pre-existing conditions. Our report looks at people who are diagnosed with health conditions that commonly lead to denials of coverage. Denials, however, are just the tip of the iceberg. Our analysis presents a conservative estimate of the number of people who are affected by pre-existing conditions for the following three reasons: Families USA May 2010 Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions 7 First, the data capture only the number of people who were diagnosed with one of a list of specific pre-existing conditions; it does not count people who had an undiagnosed condition. o Second, the data count only those people who were diagnosed with or treated for one f a list of pre-existing conditions within the one-year period of 2007 (the latest year for which data are available). s Third, we count only people who had at least one health condition on the list of pecific conditions that are likely to lead to a denial of coverage. We do not count people who had conditions that are not on this list but that may also lead to a denial of coverage or to higher premiums or coverage exclusions. The findings of our analysis are alarming: 57.2 million non-elderly Americans--more than one out of every five people under the age of 65 (22.4 percent)--have a pre-existing condition that, absent reform, could lead to a denial of coverage. A Shared Problem Our findings demonstrate that every group of Americans--people from every age group, income group, and racial and ethnic group--have pre-existing conditions. While people of all ages are affected, our analysis found that the likelihood of having a pre-existing condition grows with age. Older adults are more likely than children and younger adults to have a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage in today's marketplace. For example, fewer than one in five young adults aged 18 to 24 (15.9 percent) has a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage, while more than two in five adults aged 55 to 64 (45.5 percent) have such a condition. In addition, adults aged 45 to 64 account for only 28.3 percent of the non-elderly U.S. population, but they make up half (50.0 percent) of those with pre-existing conditions. Our findings also reveal that every income group experiences the effects of this widespread problem. For instance, the lowest-income Americans are the most likely to have such a condition, with nearly one-quarter (24.2 percent) of individuals in families with incomes below 100 percent of the federal poverty level (less than $22,050 for a family of four in 2010) affected, but middle- and higher-income Americans face pre-existing conditions nearly as frequently. More than one in five Americans (22.2 percent) in families earning more than 200 percent of poverty (more than $44,100 for a family of four in 2010) has a pre-existing condition that could lead to a denial of coverage. Families USA May 2010 8 Health Reform Finally, the findings show that every racial and ethnic group has pre-existing conditions that could lead to a denial of coverage. In fact, approximately one-quarter (24.4 percent) of whites (non-Hispanic) and 23.4 percent of African Americans (non-Hispanic) have such a condition, while slightly more than one in six Hispanics (16.9 percent) is affected. While these findings may seem somewhat counterintuitive, our analysis looks only at those people who have been diagnosed with a pre-existing condition. Research indicates, however, that there are substantial disparities in access to care and the delivery of care across racial and ethnic groups, which may in turn lead to differing rates of diagnosis. For example, Hispanic adults are more than twice as likely as non-Hispanic adults (34.3 percent versus 15.9 percent) to lack a usual source of care, and more than a quarter (25.2 percent) of Hispanic adults had no health care visits in 2007, compared to 14.7 percent of non-Hispanic adults.1 Similar trends can be seen in the delivery of cancer screenings: Only 37.3 percent of Hispanic adults over age 50 and 48.6 percent of African American adults over age 50 received colorectal cancer screening in 2005, compared to 58.5 percent of white (non-Hispanic) adults over age 50.2 Current Insurance Company Practices Until now, health insurers have generally been free to treat individuals with pre-existing conditions unfairly. In most states, insurers have been able to refuse to sell individuals policies due to a variety of factors, including their medical history, health status, and health risks. For instance, a person with a health condition such as diabetes could be denied coverage in the individual market because of his or her pre-existing condition.3 While our analysis looks only at those who are at risk of being denied coverage due to a diagnosed pre-existing condition, still more people may be denied coverage because they are at risk for developing such a condition. For example, people may be denied coverage if they take common drugs for arthritis, cholesterol, or other health conditions, even if they are taking them to prevent a disease from developing and have not actually been diagnosed.4 If people with pre-existing conditions find an insurer that is willing to sell them a policy, in most states, insurers can charge them exorbitant premiums based on their pre-existing conditions.5 Currently, in the majority of states, there are no limits on how much an insurance company can vary premiums based on an individual's health status.6 This means that insurance companies have free rein to set premiums at whatever level they claim is "necessary." Practices like these make health insurance unaffordable for millions of Americans. Families USA May 2010 Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions 9 Even if people with pre-existing conditions pay these very high premiums for coverage, the insurance policy they get still might not cover their most important health problems. In every state, most insurance companies can exclude coverage for care related to enrollees' pre-existing conditions, at least for a certain period of time.7 For example, an insurer may be willing to sell a policy to a person with asthma, but it can exclude any treatment or services related to asthma from the person's coverage.8 In a survey of adults who attempted to purchase policies in the private individual market in a three-year period, more than half (57 percent) found it very difficult or impossible to find a plan that they thought was affordable, and nearly half (47 percent) found it very difficult or impossible to find a plan that offered the coverage they needed.9 Currently, five states have laws that require insurance companies in the individual market to accept all individuals who apply for coverage, regardless of their health status or other factors.10 However, even people in states that offer the greatest protections for those with pre-existing conditions aren't fully protected: If an individual in one of these states tries to buy a policy after being uninsured for at least 63 days, the insurer is still free to exclude coverage of his or her pre-existing conditions for a period of time, just like in every other state.11 Once health reform is fully implemented and strong consumer protections are put in place, all insurance companies will be required to sell coverage to all Americans and will not be allowed to deny coverage, charge people higher premiums based on their health status, or sell them policies that exclude coverage for certain health problems. The Consequences of Coverage Denials In our current system, a denial of coverage can lead to a broad range of adverse consequences. Many people who are denied coverage are forced to go without health insurance, which puts them at risk both physically and financially. Those who are uninsured are less likely to get the care that they need when they need it and are more likely to delay seeking care--often until a condition becomes so serious that treatment can no longer be put off. Quite often, the uninsured also suffer devastating financial consequences as a result of paying for this care. In addition, the fear of going without health coverage negatively affects productivity and the labor market because many Americans make decisions about which job to choose, or whether to stay in a job, based on whether the job provides health coverage--a phenomenon known as "job lock." By ensuring that everyone, regardless of health status, has an offer of coverage, health reform will help diminish these adverse consequences. Families USA May 2010 10 Health Reform T Poorer Health he health consequences of going without coverage form a vicious circle. Those who do not have coverage often do not receive care when they need it. For example: w Uninsured adults are six times more likely than those who are privately insured to go ithout needed care due to its cost (24 percent versus 4 percent).12 p Uninsured adults are seven times more likely than insured adults to have gone without reventive care in the last year (42 percent versus 6 percent).13 a Uninsured adults with chronic conditions are particularly at risk. Among uninsured dults with chronic conditions a nearly one-third (32 percent) went without needed medical care, t pproximately 59 percent delayed care, and hree out of five (60 percent) did not fill a prescription due to cost.14 People who go without coverage are less likely to have a usual source of care outside of the emergency room, often go without screenings and preventive care, are more likely to delay or forgo necessary medical care, and end up sicker when they do get care. When uninsured adults put off seeing a doctor, illnesses that could have been prevented or treated easily often become much more serious, and people can end up with worse outcomes and have more troublesome diagnoses when they do seek care. The uninsured are therefore more likely to need intensive interventions. For example, it is important that individuals with diabetes monitor their blood sugar. Poor management of diabetes can lead to devastating consequences, such as kidney failure, blindness, and amputation, all of which can be prevented through good diabetes control.15 Of course, the worst consequence of being uninsured is premature death: Studies have shown that uninsured adults are at least 25 percent more likely to die prematurely than privately insured adults.16 W Financial Burdens hen uninsured individuals do seek care, they often have to pay more for it. One reason for this is because uninsured individuals lack the buying power to negotiate discounts on medical services like insurance companies do for their customers. As a result, uninsured patients are often charged more than 2.5 times what insured patients are charged for the same hospital services.17 Families USA May 2010 Help for Americans with Pre-Existing Conditions 11 Another reason that people without insurance often pay more for care is because they delay getting the care they need. When people delay care, their health conditions often worsen and become more costly to treat. For example, uninsured women are substantially more likely than women with private insurance to be diagnosed with breast cancer in a later stage and to require more intensive treatment.18 Accordingly, their recommended treatment is likely to be more expensive, and they may suffer economically because of this. For example, more than two-thirds (68 percent) of people who were uninsured during cancer treatment say that the costs were a burden on their families.19 When people cannot afford to pay for their medical care, they often find themselves with medical debt. In order to pay their debt, uninsured people may use up all of their savings, charge credit cards for bills that will take years to repay, or take out a loan or mortgage on their home. When those resources have been exhausted, people with medical debt may struggle to pay for basic necessities such as food, heat, clothing, and other basic necessities.20 Medical debt is strongly linked to bankruptcy. In 2007, illness or medical bills were two key contributing factors to nearly two-thirds (62.1 percent) of all personal bankruptices filed.21 In addition, medical debt can lead to the loss of a home. One study found that nearly half of home foreclosures (49 percent) in four states were caused, at least in part, by financial issues stemming from a medical problem, such as illness or injury, medical bills that were beyond the person's ability to pay, or lost work because of their own medical problems or those of a family member.22 I L abor Market Inefficiency n our current system, people with health conditions have a difficult time finding coverage in the individual market. Uncertainty about whether they'll be able to find affordable coverage leads many Americans to make decisions about which job to choose or whether to stay in a job based on whether the job provides health coverage. This phenomenon is known as "job lock." 23 Job lock primarily affects individuals with health conditions who are considering leaving their current job for another job that does not offer health insurance. Workers who have health problems are less likely to leave a job that offers health coverage. One study found that chronically ill workers who rely on their employer for health coverage are about 40 percent less likely to leave their job than chronically ill workers who do not rely on their employer for coverage.24 Another study found that workers with a history of health problems such as diabetes, cancer, or heart attack, and those who have substantial medical expenses, stay at their jobs significantly longer because of their job-based health coverage.25 Families USA May 2010 12 Health Reform Job lock has a particularly strong effect on people who have family members with chronic illnesses. Research has shown, for example, that workers who rely on their employer to provide insurance for chronically ill family members stay in jobs that they might otherwise leave. One study found that women with job-based coverage who have a chronically ill family member that depends on that coverage are 65 percent less likely to leave their job than women with job-based coverage who have a chronically ill family member that does not depend on that employer coverage.26 The fear of going without health coverage discourages individuals from leaving their existing jobs and starting new businesses of their own, especially if they have pre-existing conditions or if they have a family member with a health condition. Productivity is hurt when the new ideas, new products, and competitiveness that new businesses bring to the economy are lost. Health reform has the potential to significantly reduce the problem of job lock: Thanks to reform, individuals will no longer have to base their employment decisions on whether a job offers health coverage. Conclusion With the passage of health reform, all Americans, including those with pre-existing conditions, can be confident that they will be able to purchase insurance today and in the future. The newly passed legislation will have a profound effect on the millions of Americans who have pre-existing conditions. Because of health reform, insurance companies will no longer be allowed to deny people coverage based on health status, and 57.2 million nonelderly Americans who have a diagnosed pre-existing condition will no longer be at risk of being denied coverage. Nor will they face higher premiums or policies that exclude the very benefits they need. These new protections mean that every person will have access to highquality, affordable coverage. Families USA May 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?