STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al

Filing 83

NOTICE Errata re Exhibits in support of 82 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment by TIMOTHY F GEITHNER, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, HILDA L SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY (Attachments: # 1 Table of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37, # 39 Exhibit 38, # 40 Exhibit 39, # 41 Exhibit 40, # 42 Exhibit 41, # 43 Exhibit 42, # 44 Exhibit 43) (BECKENHAUER, ERIC)

STATE OF FLORIDA et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al

Doc. 83 Att. 39

Exhibit 38

Dockets.Justia.com

The Cost of Failure to Enact Health Reform: Implications for States
Bowen Garrett, John Holahan, Lan Doan, and Irene Headen

National
Table 2A. Changes in Coverage Across Years, Non-Elderly Population (in millions)
2009 N % N 2014 % N 2019 %

Table 2B. Aggregate Spending Across Years, Non-Elderly Population
2009 (in billions) 2014 (in billions) % change 2009-2014 2019 (in billions) % change 2014-2019 % change 2009-2019

Worst Case Medicaid/CHIP Spending $251.2 62.1 429.8 326.4 251.2 62.1 429.8 326.4 251.2 62.1 429.8 326.4 $366.5 92.3 624.7 416.9 341.6 87.0 610.5 408.3 320.4 81.0 572.9 392.3 45.9% 48.7% 45.3% 27.7% 36.0% 40.1% 42.0% 25.1% 27.5% 30.4% 33.3% 20.2% $519.7 141.4 885.1 548.4 458.4 123.1 847.3 521.3 403.8 106.6 740.6 476.2 41.8% 53.2% 41.7% 31.6% 34.2% 41.5% 38.8% 27.7% 26.1% 31.6% 29.3% 21.4% 106.8% 127.8% 105.9% 68.0% 82.4% 98.3% 97.2% 59.7% 60.7% 71.7% 72.3% 45.9% Uncompensated Care Employer Premium Spending Individual and Family Spending Intermediate Case Medicaid/CHIP Spending Uncompensated Care Employer Premium Spending Individual and Family Spending Best Case Medicaid/CHIP Spending Uncompensated Care Employer Premium Spending Individual and Family Spending

Worst Case Employer-Sponsored Insurance Non-Group Medicaid Medicare Other Uninsured Total Intermediate Case Employer-Sponsored Insurance Non-Group Medicaid Medicare Other Uninsured Total Best Case Employer-Sponsored Insurance Non-Group Medicaid Medicare Other Uninsured Total 150.0 15.8 44.1 4.5 4.0 49.1 267.6 56.1 5.9 16.5 1.7 1.5 18.4 100.0 151.9 13.8 48.3 4.5 4.1 53.1 275.7 55.1 5.0 17.5 1.6 1.5 19.3 100.0 153.0 13.0 51.9 4.5 4.3 57.0 283.6 53.9 4.6 18.3 1.6 1.5 20.1 100.0 150.0 15.8 44.1 4.5 4.0 49.1 267.6 56.1 5.9 16.5 1.7 1.5 18.4 100.0 148.1 13.1 49.7 4.5 4.2 56.2 275.7 53.7 4.7 18.0 1.6 1.5 20.4 100.0 145.7 12.0 54.9 4.5 4.3 62.2 283.6 51.4 4.2 19.3 1.6 1.5 21.9 100.0 150.0 15.8 44.1 4.5 4.0 49.1 267.6 56.1 5.9 16.5 1.7 1.5 18.4 100.0 145.2 12.8 51.2 4.6 4.2 57.7 275.7 52.7 4.7 18.6 1.7 1.5 20.9 100.0 139.4 12.2 57.4 4.6 4.3 65.7 283.6 49.2 4.3 20.3 1.6 1.5 23.2 100.0

Source: Urban Institute's Health Insurance Policy Simulation Model Note: Individual and Family Spending includes out-of-pocket health care costs and premiums.

Health Reform: The Cost of Failure

13