Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 159

RESPONSE/REPLY to 95 Affidavit, Supplemental Claim Construction Brief by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Christine Haskett, # 2 Exhibit #1- Hearing Transcript, # 3 Exhibit #2- Presentation, # 4 Exhibit #3- Contentions, # 5 Exhibit #4- EP0847654B1, # 6 Exhibit #5- Comparison, # 7 Exhibit #6- Translation, # 8 Exhibit #7- Rule 43)(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT 2

’119 Patent
“responsive to receiving the second message,
transmitting a third message indicative of the
second status”

1

“responsive to …”
System Accused of Infringement
’119 Patent

“2nd MESSAGE”?

Status update
sent to IMAP
server

45

“responsive to …”
System Accused of Infringement
’119 Patent

“2nd MESSAGE”?

Status update
sent to IMAP
server

No third message:
Status update
NOT sent to iPad

46

“responsive to …”
System Accused of Infringement
’119 Patent

47

“responsive to …”
Motorola’s “Third Message” Contention
’119 Patent

Insert 119_031 to _045 from tutorial

Notification Server
monitors SMTP server

When Notification
Server sees new
message, it sends ping
48

“responsive to …”
Motorola’s “Third Message” Contention
’119 Patent

After receiving ping,
iPad and iPhone
send request

49