Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 179

NOTICE by Apple, Inc. Apple Inc.'s Response in Support of Motorola Mobility, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Supplemental Declaration of Christine Saunders Haskett, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pace, Christopher)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-UU MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Plaintiff, vs. APPLE INC., JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. APPLE, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, vs. MOTOROLA, INC., and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Counterclaim Defendants. APPLE INC.’S RESPONSE IN SUPPORT OF MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL On October 28, 2011 Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) filed a Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, which requests to file its Notice Concerning October 28, 2011 Infringement Contentions and Motion for Deadline For Final Infringement Contentions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law In Support (“Notice and Motion” ) under seal. For reasons explained more fully in the accompanying Supplemental Declaration of Christine Saunders Haskett in Support of Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Response to Motorola’s Motion for Leave to File Document Under Seal, Apple supports Motorola's Motion to file its Notice and Motion under seal, as they cite to confidential documents including those relating to the architecture and design of Apple products, as well as other competitively sensitive information that Apple holds in confidence. Apple respectfully requests that the Court issue an order permitting Motorola to file under seal its Notice and Motion. Dated: November 7, 2011 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Christopher R.J. Pace Christopher R. J. Pace Edward Soto WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 577-3100 Facsimile: (305) 374-7159 Attorneys for Apple Inc. Robert T. Haslam COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 632-4700 Of Counsel: Matthew D. Powers Steven Cherensky Tensegrity Law Group LLP 1 Facsimile: (650) 632-4800 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: 650-802-6000 Facsimile: 650-802-6001 Robert D. Fram Christine Saunders Haskett Samuel F. Ernst COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 Jill J. Ho WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 Mark G. Davis WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 682-7000 Facsimile: (202) 857-0940 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on November 7, 2011, I filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List via email and CM/ECF. /s/ Christopher R.J. Pace Christopher R.J. Pace (Fla. Bar No. 0721166) 3 SERVICE LIST Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-UU Edward M. Mullins Fla. Bar No. 863920 ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS &GROSSMAN, P.A. 701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 372-8282 Facsimile: (305) 372-8202 Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc. Electronically served via CM/ECF and via email Of Counsel: Charles K. Verhoeven David A. Perlson Anthony Pastor QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 93111 (415) 875-6600 Raymond N. Nimrod Edward J. DeFranco QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 (212) 849-7000 David A. Nelson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &SULLIVAN, LLP 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 705-7400 Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc. Electronically served via email 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?