Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 211

MOTION to Amend/Correct the Procedural Schedule to Serve Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and Accompanying Memorandum of Law in Support by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Responses due by 1/17/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Cathleen Garrigan, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N)(Mullins, Edward)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-UU MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. APPLE INC., Defendant. APPLE INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Counterclaim Defendants. MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. AND MOTOROLA, INC.'S FIRST SET OF REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION TO APPLE INC. (NOS. 1-88) Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 34, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. ("Mobility") and Counterclaim Defendant Motorola, Inc. ("Motorola") (collectively, "Counterclaim-Defendants") request that Defendant Apple Inc. respond fully and in writing to this First Set of Requests for the Production of Documents and Things (“Requests”) and produce the documents and things requested herein in accordance with the following instructions and definitions at the offices of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, NY 10010 within thirty (30) days from the date of service of these Requests. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 14. All communications and correspondence between Apple and the named inventors of the Apple Asserted Patents. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 15. All documents concerning the scope, validity, or enforceability of any of the Apple Asserted Patents. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 16. All documents concerning any secondary consideration or other objective evidence of non-obviousness of the Apple Asserted Claims, including commercial success, long-felt need, commercial acquiescence, expressions of skepticism, copying, teaching away, failed attempts by others, or simultaneous development and any nexus between such secondary consideration or other objective evidence of non-obviousness and the Apple Asserted Claims. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 17. All documents and things concerning Apple's contention as to what constituted the level of skill of a person of ordinary skill in the art to which the subject matter of each of the Apple Asserted Patents pertains, at the time of filing with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office the original application resulting in each Apple Asserted Patent. REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 18. All documents and things concerning any Prior Art relating to the Apple Asserted Patents, including any document or thing identified as potential Prior Art to Apple by any third party. 7 Dated: December 29, 2010 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Mark D. Baker____________ Edward J. DeFranco Alexander Rudis Mark D. Baker Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10010 Tel.: (212) 849-7000 / Fax: (212) 849-7100 Charles K. Verhoeven Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: (415) 875-6600 / Fax: (415) 875-6700 David A. Nelson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Tel.: (312) 705-7400 / Fax: (312) 705-7401 Edward M. Mullins Astigarraga Davis Mullins & Grossman, P.A. 701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Tel.: (305) 372-8282 / Fax: (305) 372-8202 Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc. and Motorola, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 29, 2010, I served the following document via electronic mail on all counsel of record identified on the attached Service List. ___/s/ Mark Baker______ Mark Baker SERVICE LIST Motorola Mobility, Inc. versus Apple Inc. Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-UU United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Christopher R.J. Pace christopher.pace@weil.com Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, Florida 33131 Tel.: (305) 577-3100 Matthew D. Powers matthew.powers@weil.com Steven S. Cherensky steven.cherensky@weil.com Jill J. Ho jill.ho@weil.com Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065-1134 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Mark G. Davis mark.davis@weil.com Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900 Telephone: (202) 682-7000 Patricia Young patricia.young@weil.com Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 767 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10153 Telephone: (212) 310-8000 Apple.Motorola.FL.WGM.Service@weil.com Attorneys for Apple, Inc. Electronically served via email

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?