Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 340

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 323 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Procedural Schedule by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motorola's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Apple's Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule)(Herrera, Sujey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED APPLE INC., Defendant. APPLE INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Counterclaim Defendants. PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT MOTOROLA MOBILITY'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) respectfully requests that this Court grant it an enlargement of time until May 16, 2012, to respond to the Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule by Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) (D.E. 323). Good cause exists for granting this motion for the following reasons: 1. On April 17, 2012, Apple filed its Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule in the above-referenced action. (D.E. 323). This Motion requests that the Court consolidate Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS ("the 2010 Case") and Case No. 1:12cv020271-Civ-RNS ("the 2012 Case"). 2. Motorola’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion is due May 4, 2012. 3. On April 23, 2012, the Court Ordered that "[w]ithin twenty days, the parties are directed to meet-and-confer regarding an appropriate amended procedural schedule for this case, in light of this Order. After meeting-and conferring, the parties shall notify the Court as to their agreement on a proposed amended procedural schedule for this 2010 case." (D.E. 327 at 2). The Court also ordered that "[t]he parties shall separately discuss whether or not this case and the 2012 case should be consolidated in whole or in part, for discovery purposes only, or for any other limited purpose. Upon such discussions, the parties shall notify the Court of whether they have come to an agreement, which the Court may adopt, or whether they disagree and why." Id. 4. Accordingly, Apple and Motorola must meet and confer regarding the potential consolidation of the 2010 Case and the 2012 Case by May 14, 2012. The parties are currently scheduled to meet and confer on May 2, 2012 5. Motorola requests an enlargement of time, up through and including May 16, 2012 to respond to Apple's Motion to Amend The Procedural Schedule, so that the parties may 1 Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB have adequate time to fully meet and confer in compliance with the Court’s order. Apple does not oppose Motorola's request. 6. This motion is not filed for the purpose of delay but to conserve the resources of the parties and the Court, and to serve the interests of judicial efficiency. 7. Apple will not be prejudiced by the granting of the brief enlargement of time requested herein as evidenced by its agreement to the relief being requested herein. WHEREFORE Motorola requests this Court to enter an Order granting it an enlargement of time up through and including May 16, 2012, to serve its Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Amend The Procedural Schedule. A proposed order is attached. CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), I hereby certify that counsel for Motorola has contacted Apple’s counsel regarding the requested enlargement of time and Apple’s counsel has indicated that Apple does not object to the relief sought herein. /s/ Sujey S. Herrera Sujey S. Herrera Dated: May 1, 2012 Respectfully submitted, __/s/ Sujey S. Herrera_________________________ Edward M. Mullins (Fla. Bar No. 863920) Sujey S. Herrera (Fla. Bar No. 92445) ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS & GROSSMAN, P.A. 701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor Miami, Florida 33131 Tel.: (305) 372-8282 / Fax: (305) 372-8202 Charles K. Verhoeven* 2 Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB David A. Perlson* Cathleen G. Garrigan* QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Tel.: (415) 875-6600 / Fax: (415) 875-6700 Edward J. DeFranco* Raymond N. Nimrod* QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor New York, New York 10010 Tel.: (212) 849-7000 / Fax: (212) 849-7100 David A. Nelson* QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450 Chicago, Illinois 60661 Tel.: (312) 705-7400 / Fax: (312) 705-7401 Marshall S. Searcy, III* Matthew O. Korhonen* QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 Tel.: (213) 443-3000 *Admitted pro hac vice Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Motorola Solutions, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc. 3 Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 1, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF filing system. I also certify that the foregoing document is being served this date on all counsel of record or pro se parties on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated by the CM/ECF system or; in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing. /s/ Sujey S. Herrera___________________ Sujey S. Herrera (Fla. Bar No. 92445) SERVICE LIST Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc. Case No.: 1:10-23580-Civ-UU United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Christopher R.J. Pace Edward Soto Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200 Miami, Florida 33131 Tel.: (305) 577-3100 / Fax: (305) 374-7159 Samuel F. Ernst* Christine Saunders Haskett* Robert D. Fram* Chris Martiniak* Winslow B. Taub* Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, California 94111-5356 Tel.: (415) 591-6000 / Fax: (415) 591-6091 Jill J. Schmidt* Anne M. Cappella* Brian C. Chang* Arjun Mehra Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065-1134 Tel.: (650) 802-3000 / Fax: (650) 802-3100 Robert T. Haslam* Covington & Burling LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, California 94065 Tel.: (650) 632-4700 / Fax: (650) 632-4800 Mark G. Davis* Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP 1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 Elena M. DiMuzio* Covington & Burling LLP One Front Street San Francisco, California 94111 4 Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB Telephone: (202) 682-7000 Facsimile: (202) 857-0940 Tel.: (415) 591-6000 / Fax: (415) 591-6091 *Admitted pro hac vice Christopher K. Eppich* Covington & Burling LLP 9191 Towne Centre Drive, 6th Floor San Diego, California 92122 Tel.: (858) 678-1800 / Fax: (858) 678-1600 Matthew D. Powers* Steven S. Cherensky* Azra Hadzimehmedovic* Monica Mucchetti Eno* Stefani C. Smith* Tensegrity Law Group LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401 Redwood Shores, California Telephone: (650) 802-6000 Facsimile: (650) 802-6001 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?