Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 340

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 323 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Procedural Schedule by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motorola's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Apple's Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule)(Herrera, Sujey)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

APPLE INC.,
Defendant.

APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC. and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendants.

PLAINTIFF AND COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT
MOTOROLA MOBILITY'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO APPLE INC.’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE

Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB

Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) respectfully
requests that this Court grant it an enlargement of time until May 16, 2012, to respond to the
Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule by Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff, Apple, Inc.
(“Apple”) (D.E. 323). Good cause exists for granting this motion for the following reasons:
1.

On April 17, 2012, Apple filed its Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule in

the above-referenced action. (D.E. 323). This Motion requests that the Court consolidate Case
No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS ("the 2010 Case") and Case No. 1:12cv020271-Civ-RNS ("the 2012
Case").
2.

Motorola’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion is due May 4, 2012.

3.

On April 23, 2012, the Court Ordered that "[w]ithin twenty days, the parties are

directed to meet-and-confer regarding an appropriate amended procedural schedule for this case,
in light of this Order. After meeting-and conferring, the parties shall notify the Court as to their
agreement on a proposed amended procedural schedule for this 2010 case." (D.E. 327 at 2). The
Court also ordered that "[t]he parties shall separately discuss whether or not this case and the
2012 case should be consolidated in whole or in part, for discovery purposes only, or for any
other limited purpose. Upon such discussions, the parties shall notify the Court of whether they
have come to an agreement, which the Court may adopt, or whether they disagree and why." Id.
4.

Accordingly, Apple and Motorola must meet and confer regarding the potential

consolidation of the 2010 Case and the 2012 Case by May 14, 2012. The parties are currently
scheduled to meet and confer on May 2, 2012
5.

Motorola requests an enlargement of time, up through and including May 16,

2012 to respond to Apple's Motion to Amend The Procedural Schedule, so that the parties may

1

Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB
have adequate time to fully meet and confer in compliance with the Court’s order. Apple does
not oppose Motorola's request.
6.

This motion is not filed for the purpose of delay but to conserve the resources of

the parties and the Court, and to serve the interests of judicial efficiency.
7.

Apple will not be prejudiced by the granting of the brief enlargement of time

requested herein as evidenced by its agreement to the relief being requested herein.
WHEREFORE Motorola requests this Court to enter an Order granting it an enlargement
of time up through and including May 16, 2012, to serve its Opposition to Apple’s Motion to
Amend The Procedural Schedule. A proposed order is attached.
CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL
Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(a)(3), I hereby certify that counsel for Motorola has contacted
Apple’s counsel regarding the requested enlargement of time and Apple’s counsel has indicated
that Apple does not object to the relief sought herein.

/s/ Sujey S. Herrera
Sujey S. Herrera

Dated: May 1, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
__/s/ Sujey S. Herrera_________________________
Edward M. Mullins (Fla. Bar No. 863920)
[e-mail]
Sujey S. Herrera (Fla. Bar No. 92445)
[e-mail]
ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS & GROSSMAN, P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
Charles K. Verhoeven*
[e-mail]

2

Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB
David A. Perlson*
[e-mail]
Cathleen G. Garrigan*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
Edward J. DeFranco*
[e-mail]
Raymond N. Nimrod*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
David A. Nelson*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, Illinois 60661
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]
Marshall S. Searcy, III*
[e-mail]
Matthew O. Korhonen*
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
Tel.: [phone]
*Admitted pro hac vice
Counsel for Plaintiff/Counterclaim-Defendant Motorola
Solutions, Inc. and Motorola Mobility, Inc.

3

Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 1, 2012, I electronically filed the foregoing document
with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF filing system. I also certify that the foregoing
document is being served this date on all counsel of record or pro se parties on the attached
Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing
generated by the CM/ECF system or; in some other authorized manner for those counsel or
parties who are not authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.

/s/ Sujey S. Herrera___________________
Sujey S. Herrera (Fla. Bar No. 92445)
SERVICE LIST
Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Case No.: 1:10-23580-Civ-UU
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Christopher R.J. Pace
[e-mail]
Edward Soto
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
Miami, Florida 33131
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Samuel F. Ernst*
[e-mail]
Christine Saunders Haskett*
[e-mail]
Robert D. Fram*
[e-mail]
Chris Martiniak*
[e-mail]
Winslow B. Taub*
[e-mail]
Covington & Burling LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, California 94111-5356
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Jill J. Schmidt*
[e-mail]
Anne M. Cappella*
[e-mail]
Brian C. Chang*
[e-mail]
Arjun Mehra
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, California 94065-1134
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Robert T. Haslam*
[e-mail]
Covington & Burling LLP
333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Mark G. Davis*
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005

Elena M. DiMuzio*
[e-mail]
Covington & Burling LLP
One Front Street
San Francisco, California 94111
4

Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

*Admitted pro hac vice
Christopher K. Eppich*
[e-mail]
Covington & Burling LLP
9191 Towne Centre Drive, 6th Floor
San Diego, California 92122
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Matthew D. Powers*
[e-mail]
Steven S. Cherensky*
[e-mail]
Azra Hadzimehmedovic*
[e-mail]
Monica Mucchetti Eno*
[e-mail]
Stefani C. Smith*
[e-mail]
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, California
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

5