Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
340
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 323 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Procedural Schedule by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motorola's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Apple's Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule)(Herrera, Sujey)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.
APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA, INC. and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Counterclaim Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTOROLA’S UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO APPLE’S MOTION TO AMEND
THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
THIS CAUSE came to be heard upon Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Motorola
Mobility Inc.’s (“Motorola”) Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to
Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Amend the Procedural
Schedule. The Court, having reviewed the record in this action, being informed of the agreement
of the parties and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1. That Motorola’s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to Apple’s
Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule is GRANTED.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami-Dade County, Florida on this _____ day
of May, 2012.
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE ROBERT N. SCOLA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to:
Counsel of record
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?