Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 340

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 323 MOTION to Amend/Correct the Procedural Schedule by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Granting Motorola's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Apple's Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule)(Herrera, Sujey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 1:10cv023580-Civ-RNS-TEB MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Plaintiff, v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED APPLE INC., Defendant. APPLE INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Counterclaim Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTOROLA’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO RESPOND TO APPLE’S MOTION TO AMEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE THIS CAUSE came to be heard upon Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant Motorola Mobility Inc.’s (“Motorola”) Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule. The Court, having reviewed the record in this action, being informed of the agreement of the parties and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 1. That Motorola’s Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time to respond to Apple’s Motion to Amend the Procedural Schedule is GRANTED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in Miami-Dade County, Florida on this _____ day of May, 2012. ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE ROBERT N. SCOLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies furnished to: Counsel of record

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?