Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 361

MOTION to Amend/Correct (84 in 1:12-cv-20271-RNS) Scheduling Order,,, MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND MOTION TO AMEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE by Apple Inc.. Responses due by 10/29/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11)Associated Cases: 1:12-cv-20271-RNS, 1:10-cv-23580-RNS(Pace, Christopher)

EXHIBIT 3

From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:

Schmidt, Jill
Friday, August 31, 2012 4:49 PM
Marshall Searcy
Moto-Apple-SDFL; Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External
RE: Apple/Motorola (FL): DRAFT joint motion to amend procedural schedule
US_ACTIVE_Joint Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule_44084898_2.DOC;
US_ACTIVE_PO Granting Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule_44084900_2.DOC

Hi Marshall, 

Attached is a revised draft for your review.  Assuming Motorola has no further changes, we can aim to get this on file 
first thing on Tuesday morning. 

Best regards, 
Jill 

From: Marshall Searcy [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 7:39 AM
To: Marshall Searcy
Cc: Schmidt, Jill; Moto-Apple-SDFL; Weil_TLG Apple Moto FL External
Subject: Re: Apple/Motorola (FL): DRAFT joint motion to amend procedural schedule

Hi Jill,  
Assuming that Apple does not have changes you have our permission to file. 

On Aug 30, 2012, at 11:11 AM, "Marshall Searcy" <[e-mail]> wrote: 
Jill, did apple have any changes on this? 

On Aug 29, 2012, at 7:34 PM, "Schmidt, Jill" <[e-mail]> wrote: 
Hi Marshall, 

As promised during our meet and confer, attached is a draft joint motion to amend the 
procedural schedule that reflects our agreement to extend the deadline for 
infringement contentions to November 7, 2012 and the deadline for invalidity 
contentions to December 5, 2012.  Our team is still reviewing this so we might have 
some minor tweaks tomorrow, but we are circulating a working draft for your review in 
the hopes that we can get this on file sooner rather than later.  

Best regards, 
Jill 
<image001.jpg> 

Jill Schmidt (née Ho)

1

Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1134
[e-mail]
[phone] Direct
[phone] Fax 

The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual
or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us
by email, [e-mail], and destroy the original message. Thank you.

<US_ACTIVE_Joint Motion to Amend Procedural Schedule_44084898_1.DOC>
<US_ACTIVE_PO Granting Motion to Amend Procedural
Schedule_44084900_1.DOC>

2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 1:12-cv-20271-RNS-TEB

MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

APPLE INC.,
Defendant.

Consolidated Cases:
Case No. 1:10-cv-23580-RNS
Case No. 1:12-cv-20271-RNS

APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
Counterclaim Defendant.

JOINT MOTION TO AMEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
Pursuant to the Court’s May 14, 2012 Amended Scheduling Order, D.E. 84, Motorola
Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”) and Apple Inc. (“Apple”) are scheduled to exchange infringement
contentions on September 7, 2012 and invalidity contentions on October 5, 2012. In light of the
fact that both parties are expected to release new products this fall, Motorola and Apple have
agreed to exchange infringement contentions on November 7, 2012 and invalidity contentions on
December 5, 2012 to allow sufficient time for the parties to more fully review relevant
documents and include such new products in their respective infringement contentions. The
parties are also currently discussing whether any products may be added to the case after
Field Code Changed

November 7, 2012. Apple believes that no additional products should be accused by either party
after infringement contentions are served. Motorola disagrees.
Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit this joint request for the Court to amend its
scheduling order to the extent agreed uponto reflect these revised deadlines.

Apple will

separately move for an additional amendment to the scheduling order to include a deadline for
adding new accused products if the parties cannot reach agreement on that issue.
Case Event
Infringement contentions
Invalidity contentions

Deadline
November 7, 2012
December 5, 2012

No other deadlines set forth in the Court’s May 14, 2012 Amended Scheduling Order
would be affected by this change.

2

Dated: October 11, 2012August 30, 2012

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/ Edward M. Mullins
Edward M. Mullins
[e-mail]
Astigarraga Davis Mullins & Grossman, P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Tel.: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

/s/ Christopher R. J. Pace
_____
Christopher R. J. Pace
[e-mail]
Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
1395 Brickell Avenue, Suite 1200
Miami, Florida 33131
Tel: [phone] / Fax: [phone]

Of Counsel:
Charles K. Verhoeven
[e-mail]
David A. Perlson
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 93111
[phone]

Of Counsel:
Mark G. Davis
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
1300 Eye Street, N.W., Suite 900
Washington, DC 20005
[phone]
Anne M. Cappella
[e-mail]
Jill J. Schmidt
[e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[phone]

Raymond N. Nimrod
[e-mail]
Edward J. DeFranco
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
[phone]

Matthew D. Powers
[e-mail]
Steven Cherensky
[e-mail]
Tensegrity Law Group LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[phone]

David A. Nelson
[e-mail]
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
[phone]

Kenneth H. Bridges
[e-mail]
Michael T. Pieja
[e-mail]
3000 El Camino Real, 2nd Floor
Palo Alto, CA 94306
[phone]

Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc.

Attorneys for Apple Inc.

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on October 11, 2012August 30, 2012, I electronically filed
the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. I also certify that the
foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record or pro se parties identified
on the attached Service List in the manner specified, either via transmission of Notices of
Electronic Filing generated by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or
parties who are not authorized to received electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
/s/ Christopher R. J. Pace
Christopher R. J. Pace (Fla. Bar No. 0721166)

4

SERVICE LIST
Motorola Mobility, Inc. versus Apple Inc.
Consolidated Case Nos. 1:12cv020271-Civ-RNS & 1:10cv235800Civ-RNS
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Edward M. Mullins
Fla. Bar No. 863920
[e-mail]
ASTIGARRAGA DAVIS MULLINS & GROSSMAN, P.A.
701 Brickell Avenue, 16th Floor
Miami, FL 33131
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Of Counsel:
Charles K. Verhoeven
David A. Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 93111
[phone]
Raymond N. Nimrod
Edward J. DeFranco
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, NY 10010
[phone]
David A. Nelson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
500 West Madison Street, Suite 2450
Chicago, IL 60661
[phone]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Motorola Mobility, Inc.
Electronically served via email

5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case No. 1:12-cv-20271-RNS-TEB
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

APPLE INC.,

Consolidated Cases:
Case No. 1:10-cv-23580-RNS
Case No. 1:12-cv-20271-RNS

Defendant.
APPLE INC.,
Counterclaim Plaintiff,
v.
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
Counterclaim Defendant.

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND
THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
THE COURT having considered the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend the
Procedural Schedule (“Motion”), it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:
1.

Having found that good cause exists for the proposed extensions to the

existing deadlines for the exchange of infringement contentions and invalidity
contentions, the Motion is GRANTED.
2.

The procedural schedule is amended as follows:

Case Event
Infringement contentions
Invalidity contentions

Deadline
November 7, 2012
December 5, 2012
Field Code Changed

1

All other deadlines set forth in the Court’s May 14, 2012 Amended Scheduling Order,
D.E. 84, shall remain in effect.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers, in Miami, Florida, on this ___ day of
SeptemberAugust, 2012.

Honorable Robert N. Scola, Jr.
United States District Judge
Copies to:
All Counsel of Record

2