Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
Filing
177
RESPONSE/REPLY Microsoft Corporation's Responsive Claim Construction Brief and Exhibits by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 802, #3 Exhibit 906, #4 Exhibit 907, #5 Exhibit 908, #6 Exhibit 909, #7 Exhibit 910, #8 Exhibit 1005, #9 Exhibit 1006, #10 Exhibit 1117, #11 Exhibit 1118, #12 Exhibit 1119, #13 Exhibit 1120, #14 Exhibit 1121, #15 Exhibit 1122, #16 Exhibit 1411)(Miner, Curtis)
EXHIBITS ACCOMPANYING MICROSOFT’S RESPONSIVE CLAIM
CONSTRUCTION BRIEF
‘839 Patent
Ex. 802
Defendant Microsoft Corporation’s Disclosure of Proposed Claim
Constructions (June 3, 2011)
‘899 Patent
Ex. 906
Motorola’s updated Proposed Claim Constructions for the Patents-in-Suit, dated
June 3, 2011, for the ‘899 Patent
Ex. 907
7/7/11 Report of Kaliski Concerning ‘899 Patent
Ex. 908
Excerpts from the deposition of Motorola’s expert on its ‘899 patent, Dr. Martin
Kaliski (July 20, 2011)
Ex. 909
Email Spencer to Robbins dated 7/27/11 confirming withdrawal of claims from
‘001 and ‘899 patent
Confidential
Ex. 910
Supplemental Report of Kaliski Regarding the ‘899 Patent, dated 7/12/2011
‘001 Patent
Confidential
6/24/11 Kaliski Opening Report for the ‘001 Patent
Ex. 1005
Ex. 1006
Reed reference, MS-MOTO_SDFLA_00000016870 - 16887
‘333 Patent
Ex. 1117
Agreement to “make simultaneous exchange of proposed constructions” on
May 6, 2011 [Docket No. 49] (Apr. 10, 2011)
Ex. 1118
Motorola’s proposed constructions for its ‘333 patent (May 6, 2011)
Ex. 1119
Motorola’s final constructions for its ‘333 patent (June 3, 2011)
Ex. 1120
Excerpts from the deposition of Motorola’s expert on its ‘333 patent, Dr. Martin
Kaliski (July 21, 2011)
Ex. 1121
Exhibit 23 to the deposition of Dr. Kaliski (July 21, 2011)
Ex. 1122
Exhibit 29 to the deposition of Dr. Kaliski (July 21, 2011)
‘370 Patent
Confidential
Ex. 1411
Excerpts from the deposition of Joel Williams (July 29, 2011)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?