Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation

Filing 177

RESPONSE/REPLY Microsoft Corporation's Responsive Claim Construction Brief and Exhibits by Microsoft Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Index of Exhibits, #2 Exhibit 802, #3 Exhibit 906, #4 Exhibit 907, #5 Exhibit 908, #6 Exhibit 909, #7 Exhibit 910, #8 Exhibit 1005, #9 Exhibit 1006, #10 Exhibit 1117, #11 Exhibit 1118, #12 Exhibit 1119, #13 Exhibit 1120, #14 Exhibit 1121, #15 Exhibit 1122, #16 Exhibit 1411)(Miner, Curtis)

Download PDF
Exhibit 1119 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 10-24063-CIV-MORENO MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC., Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PLAINTIFF MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.’S UPDATED PROPOSED CLAIM CONSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola Mobility”) submits the attached chart identifying its updated proposed constructions of the claim limitations of the patents-in-suit for which the parties seek construction by the Court. Motorola Mobility’s provides this submission without waiver of or prejudice to its right to amend or supplement as a result of further analysis, ongoing discovery, and in response to amendment or supplementation of constructions proposed by Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”). In particular, Motorola Mobility may amend its constructions to narrow the gap between its constructions and Microsoft’s to allow for resolution of as many claim construction disputes as possible prior to the submission of the parties’ claim construction briefs. Dated: June 3, 2011 By: /s/ Leslie M. Spencer_____ Jesse J. Jenner Steven Pepe Khue V. Hoang Leslie M. Spencer Ropes & Gray LLP 1211 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 596-9000 Norman H. Beamer Mark D. Rowland Gabrielle E. Higgins Ropes & Gray LLP 1900 University Avenue, 6th Floor East Palo Alto, CA 94303 Telephone: (650) 617-4000 Kevin J. Post Megan F. Raymond Ropes & Gray LLP One Metro Center 700 12th Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 Telephone: (202) 508-4600 Edward M. Mullins Hal M. Lucas Astigarraga Davis Mullins & Grossman, P.A. 701 Brickell Avenue 16th Floor Miami, FL 33131 Telephone: (305) 372-8282 Attorneys for Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on June 3, 2011, copies of the foregoing Plaintiff Motorola Mobility, Inc.’s Updated Proposed Claim Constructions For The Patents-In-Suit were served by e-mail upon the counsel of record included in the attached Service List. /s/Leslie M. Spencer Leslie M. Spencer SERVICE LIST Motorola Mobility, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 1:10-cv-24063-MORENO Roberto Martinez, Esq. Curtis Miner, Esq. COLSON HICKS EIDSON 255 Alhambra Circle, Penthouse Coral Gables, FL 33134 Tel: (305) 476-7400 Email: Attorneys for Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff MICROSOFT CORPORATION Of Counsel: David T. Pritikin Richard A. Cederoth Douglas I. Lewis John W. McBride SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP One South Dearborn Chicago, IL 60603 Tel: (312) 853-7000 Email: Brian R. Nester Kevin C. Wheeler SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1501 K Street NW Washington, DC 20005 Tel: (202) 736-8000 Email: Motorola Patent No. 6,272,333 Claim Term/ Identified By Microsoft term: “data” Microsoft term: “controlling a delivery of data” Microsoft term: “fixed portion of [a/the] wireless communication system” Motorola term: Claims Motorola Proposed Construction 1, 7, 12 Digital information 1, 7, 12 Managing whether and when data is delivered 1, 3, 5, 7, 12 The stationary portion of the wireless communication system that includes base stations and a controller 1, 3, 5-7, 12-13 A portable device for use in a wireless communication system 1, 3, 5-7, 12-13 A portion of memory that includes a list of all software applications that are immediately available for use by the subscriber unit “subscriber unit” Motorola term: “application registry comprising a list of all software applications that are currently accessible to the subscriber unit” 26875538_1 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?