Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 243

Joint MOTION for Extension of Time Complete Briefing on Defendants' 239 MOTION to Dismiss Under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(c) by J. L. Albert, Mark P. Becker, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, James A. Bishop, Cambridge University Press, Hugh A. Carter, Jr, William H. Cleveland, Robert F. Hatcher, Ronald Henry, Felton Jenkins, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, Eldridge McMillan, William NeSmith, Jr, Oxford University Press, Inc., Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Sage Publications, Inc., Nancy Seamans, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Allan Vigil. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rains, John) Modified on 11/17/2010 in order to update docket text (ank).

Download PDF
E X H I B I T A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, -vMARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as Georgia State University President, et al., Defendants. (PROPOSED) ORDER Having considered the parties Joint Motion for an Extension of Time to Complete Briefing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 239] and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs' brief in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss shall be filed on or before December 6, 2010; 2. Defendants' reply brief shall be filed on or before January 6, 2011; and Civil Action File No.1:08-CV-1425-ODE 818588.1 3. Nothing in this Order shall modify any other deadlines set forth in this Court's existing scheduling orders in this case or this Court's Local Rules. SO ORDERED this ____ day of November, 2010. _________________________________ HON. ORINDA D. EVANS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Prepared by: John H. Rains IV Counsel for Plaintiffs 818588.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?