Cambridge University Press et al v. Patton et al

Filing 301

REPLY to Response to Motion re 272 MOTION in Limine IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 filed by J. L. Albert, Mark P. Becker, Kenneth R. Bernard, Jr, Larry R. Ellis, Rutledge A. Griffin, Jr, Robert F. Hatcher, C. Thomas Hopkins, Jr, W. Mansfield Jennings, Jr, James R. Jolly, Donald M. Leebern, Jr, William NeSmith, Jr, Risa Palm, Doreen Stiles Poitevint, Willis J. Potts, Jr, Neil L. Pruitt, Jr, Wanda Yancey Rodwell, Nancy Seamans, Kessel Stelling, Jr, Benjamin J. Tarbutton, III, Richard L. Tucker, Larry Walker, Philip A. Wilheit, Sr. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Errata D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Bates, Mary)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT A 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, et al., Plaintiffs, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) vs. MARK P. BECKER, in his official capacity as Georgia State University President, et al., Defendants. Civil Action File No. 1:08-CV-1425-ODE - - Videotaped deposition of JENNIFER ESPOSITO, PH.D., taken on behalf of the plaintiffs, pursuant to the stipulations contained herein, before Teresa Bishop, RPR, RMR, CCR No. B-307, at 104 Marietta Street, SB-2 Conference Room, Atlanta, Georgia, on Thursday, February 3, 2011, commencing at the hour of 9:09 a.m. _______________________________________________________ Shugart & Bishop Certified Court Reporters Suite 140 13 Corporate Square Atlanta, Georgia 30329 (770) 955-5252 SHUGART & BISHOP 30 1 when they're looking at them on their laptops, if 2 they're accessing them live from the system or do they 3 just make a copy to their hard drive and save them? 4 A. I have no idea. 5 Q. Have you seen students bring printed copies of 6 the EReserves materials to class? 7 A. Sometimes. 8 Q. How frequent an occurrence has that been? 9 A. I'm not sure. 10 Q. But it happens? 11 A. Yes. 12 Q. If you could turn to the -- I guess four pages 13 in where the assignments start. There's a chart. 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. If you look down to the June 11th entry, the 16 last three entries Hammersley, Tedlock and Gordon. 17 those all on -- works that were placed on EReserves? 18 A. Are The way that -- way that I do the EReserves is 19 that I -- at the beginning of the course I fill out the 20 paperwork required, which includes the citation 21 information, the checklist. 22 doesn't own the book or if it's checked out, then the 23 instructor has to actually physically bring his or her 24 copy to the library. 25 didn't own the book or have a copy physically, I just And then if the library So if at the time the library SHUGART & BISHOP 31 1 deleted it from the readings. 2 would tell students just cross this out. 3 4 5 And so -- you know, and I So I am not 100 percent positive that students read all three of those readings for the 11th. Q. Let me make sure I understand. So it's -- 6 syllabus was created at the beginning of the semester, I 7 take it? 8 9 A. For a summer syllabi I create them a month to two months in advance, send them out to students that 10 are registered so they can start purchasing the books. 11 You can see there's five textbooks that they have to buy 12 and that's a heavy reading load for the summer. 13 always do the syllabi in advance. 14 Q. Okay. So I So -- and then after doing the syllabi 15 you would have, if I understand what you're saying, 16 contacted the library with respect to let's just say 17 these three works here in the June 11th entry and to 18 start, attempted to put them on EReserves, is that 19 right? 20 A. That's right. 21 Q. And one possible response from the library 22 would be that their copy of the work was signed out or 23 they just don't have a copy of the work, is that -- 24 A. That's correct. 25 Q. And at that point I think what you said was SHUGART & BISHOP 32 1 rather than providing a copy you would have just scraped 2 the work? 3 A. Yes. 4 Q. Okay. And then how would the class -- what 5 would have happened in class then if there was a work 6 indicated on the syllabus that was no longer available? 7 8 9 A. I would either have e-mailed them to let them know to disregard that reading or announced it in class. Q. And sitting here now you can't recall if these 10 three works in the June 11th entry, whether that 11 happened for any of those three? 12 13 14 15 A. I believe it happened with Tedlock. But I'm not sure. Q. If you got to the point of filling out a fair use checklist -- strike that. 16 The decision or the indication from the 17 library that they didn't have a copy and your decision 18 to scrap the work, would that have happened before or 19 after filling out the fair use checklist? 20 A. After. 21 Q. So it's possible you filled out a checklist 22 but then subsequently did not use the work, is that 23 right? 24 A. That's right. 25 Q. And it's your testimony that the Tedlock was SHUGART & BISHOP 33 1 one situation where that did happen or you think maybe 2 that's what happened with that one? 3 A. I think maybe it did. 4 Q. You're not sure? 5 A. I'm not sure. 6 Q. Any on here in either of the three pages of 7 assignments where you are sure that you didn't use the 8 work? 9 A. No. 10 Q. Anywhere you are sure that you did? 11 A. Not 100 percent sure. 12 Q. Do you know for -- going back to the June 11th 13 entry for the Gordon Tuula entry, do you have a 14 recollection as to whether you did or did not end up 15 using that work? 16 17 18 A. I am not sure. I can't answer with 100 percent certainty. Q. And why is it that in the situation you 19 described that you wouldn't simply provide a copy to the 20 library yourself? 21 A. Plain and simple, I don't like to walk to the 22 library from my office building. 23 time and it's an uncomfortable walk. 24 25 Q. I wear heels all the and Mayo. In the 6/16 entry there's an entry for Pillow Same question there. Do you have an SHUGART & BISHOP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?