State of Hawaii v. Trump

Filing 201

MEMORANDUM re 65 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order filed by T.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Certificate of Service)(Iwao, Regan)

EXHIBIT 2

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

the WHITE HOUSE


From the Press O瘎�ice
Speeches & Remarks
Press Briefings
Statements & Releases
Presidential Actions
Legislation
Nominations & Appointments
Disclosures

The White House
O瘎�ice of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release

March 07, 2017

Press Brie旂�ng by Press Secretary
Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18
James S. Brady Press Briefing Room 
1:36 P.M. EST
MR. SPICER:  Hey, guys.  I brought a guest.  Good a著�ernoon.  First o瘎�, at the top, I want to
acknowledge that there’s been an additional wave of threats to Jewish community centers
and Anti-Defamation League o瘎�ices.  According to some reports, there have been over a
hundred bomb threats phoned in to Jewish institutions since the start of this year alone.  
As the President said at the beginning of his joint address, “We're a country that stands
united in condemning hate and evil in all of its forms.  We denounce these latest antiSemitic and hateful threats in the strongest terms.”  

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

1/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

It is incredibly saddening that I have to continue to share these disturbing reports with you,
and I share the President’s thoughts that he fervently hopes that we don't continue to have
to share these reports with you.  But as long as they will -- as long as they do continue, we'll
continue to condemn them and look at ways in which we can stop them.
Now, on to news of the day.  You saw President Trump yesterday continue to deliver on two
of his most significant campaign promises: protecting the country against radical Islamic
terrorism, and repealing and replacing Obamacare with a patient-centric alternative.  
We talked a lot about the executive order protecting the nation from foreign terrorists
entering the United States yesterday.  And so, on to Obamacare.  I'd like to introduce the
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Dr. Tom Price, to come up and talk to you a little
bit about the plan to repeal and replace Obamacare.
Dr. Price.
SECRETARY PRICE:  Thanks, Sean.  Good a著�ernoon.  First, let me just share with you what an
honor it is to serve as the Secretary of Health and Human Services.  I'm the third physician
out of 23 individuals who’ve had the privilege of serving as the Secretary of Health and
Human Services.  And the mission at our department is to improve the health and safety and
well-being of the American people.  And we take that mission very, very seriously.
And for many Americans, right now, their ability to gain healthcare or health coverage is a
real challenge.  For most Americans, they receive their health coverage through their
employer.  It's about 175 million folks.  Those individuals will see no significant change
other than there won't be a penalty for not purchasing coverage.  For the folks in the
Medicare system, there will be no changes at all in the current law.  But we're talking about
those people in the individual and small-group market, the moms and pops, the folks who
run the corner grocery store, the corner cleaners.  Those individuals out there are having
huge challenges gaining care and gaining coverage.
And then Medicaid is a program that by and large has decreased the ability for folks to gain
access to care, and we want to make certain that we address that.
This is about patients.  This is not about money.  This is not about something else.  This is
about patients.  And sadly, the costs are going up for those folks in the individual and smallgroup market.  The access is going down, and it's only getting worse.  You know the stories.
 Premiums increased 25 percent over the last year, on average.  Arizona had an increase of
116 percent.  Deductibles are going up for many, many folks.  If you're a mom or a dad out
there and you make $40,000, $50,000, $60,000, your deductible in this market, in that
individual and small-group market, o著�entimes is $8,000, $10,000, $12,000 a year.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

2/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

What that means is you’ve got an insurance card but you don't get care because you can't
a瘎�ord the deductible.  And we know that this is happening by talking to the folks who are
out there trying to provide the care.
A third of the counties in the United States -- one-third of the counties in the United States
have only one insurer o瘎�ering coverage on the exchange.  Five states only have one insurer
o瘎�ering coverage on the exchange.  One insurer is not a choice. So we need to make certain
that we correct that.
In Tennessee this morning, it was announced that there are a number of counties that have
no insurer o瘎�ering coverage on the exchange.  Insurers are leaving the market on the
exchange.  Last year there were 232 insurers that were providing coverage -- that were
o瘎�ering coverage on the exchange; now there are 167.  That's a loss of about 30 percent in
one year alone.  And all of this means that patients are not getting the care that they need.
Now, the principles that we have as our guiding star are a瘎�ordability, we want a system
that’s a瘎�ordable for everybody.  Accessibility, we need a system that’s accessible for
everybody.  A system that’s of the highest quality, a system that incentivizes innovation in
the healthcare system, and a system that empowers patients through both transparency
and accountability.
The President spoke last week, last Tuesday to a joint session of Congress, and he laid out
his principles.  First, wanted to make certain that those with preexisting illness and injury
were not priced out of the market.  Nobody ought to lose their coverage because they get a
bad diagnosis.
In terms of a瘎�ordability, health savings accounts -- growing choices for patients is incredibly
important.  Tax credits that allow individuals to be able to purchase the kind of coverage
that they want, not that the government forces them to buy.  We’ve always talked about -- in
terms of what kinds of reforms need to be put in place, that we need to equalize the tax
treatment for the purchase of coverage.  
Those, again, in the employer-sponsored market, they get a tax benefit for buying health
coverage.  Those folks that are out there in the individual and small-group market, no tax
benefit.  And that’s what this plan would do.
State flexibility.  It’s incredibly important that we allow the states to be the ones that are
defining what health coverage is, have the flexibility, especially in the Medicaid program, to
be able to respond to their vulnerable population.
Lawsuit abuse.  The President mentioned, and it’s incredibly important, that -- the practice
of defensive medicine wastes billions and billions of dollars every single year, and we need
to make certain that we’re addressing that as well.  The President also talked about a glide
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

3/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

path, an appropriate transition to this new phase for healthcare for our country, and that’s
important as well so that nobody falls through the cracks.  
Buying across state lines, buying insurance across state lines.  The President talked about
this on the campaign over and over.  The American people understand the commonsense
nature of purchasing across state lines, and it increases competition.  And we need to make
certain that that happens, and then addressing the incredible increase in drug prices.
There are three phases of this plan.  One is the bill that was introduced last evening in the
House of Representatives.  That’s the start of all of this.  Second are the all the regulatory
modifications and changes that can be put into place.  As you all well know, the previous
administration used regulations to a fare-thee-well -- in fact, there were 192 specific rules
that were put out as they relate to Obamacare, over 5,000 letters of guidance and the like.
 And we are going to go through every single one of those and make certain that if they help
patients, then we need to continue them.  If they harm patients or increase costs, then
obviously they need to be addressed.  And then there’s other legislation that will need to be
addressed that can’t be done through the reconciliation process.
So the goal of all of this is patient-centered healthcare, where patients and families and
doctors are making medical decisions, and not the federal government.  We commend the
House for the introduction of the bill yesterday and we look forward to working with all
individuals in this process.  
And I look forward to a few questions.  Yes, sir.
Q    Mr. Secretary, you’re familiar from your time in the House with the clout that
conservative groups like the Club for Growth and Heritage Action have with rank-and-file
members.  What does it say about this legislation that these groups are already out with
opposition to it?
SECRETARY PRICE:  Well, I think that this is the beginning of the process.  And we look
forward to working with them and others to make certain that, again, we come up with that
process that aligns with the principles that we’ve defined that they actually adhere to or
agree with as well, and that is that we need a system that’s a瘎�ordable for folks, a system
that’s accessible for individuals, that’s of the highest quality, that incentivizes innovation,
and that empowers patients.
And so we look forward to working with them through this process.
Q    Secretary, Congressman Cha瘎�etz said today that Americans may need to forgo a new
iPhone to pay for healthcare, and they’ll have to kind of make these choices.  Does the
administration agree with that?  Will Americans under this plan -- will they need to maybe
sacrifice other goods to pay for their healthcare?  
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

4/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

SECRETARY PRICE:  This is an important question, because what’s happening right now is
that the American people are having to sacrifice in order to purchase coverage.  And, as I
mentioned, many individuals can’t a瘎�ord the kind of coverage that they have right now.  So
they’ve got that insurance card but they don’t have care.  
What our desire is, is to drive down the healthcare costs for everybody.  And the way that
you do that is to increase choices for folks, increase competition, return the regulation of
healthcare where it ought to be, which is at the state level, not at the federal level.  All of
these things that, taken in their aggregate, will in fact decrease the costs of healthcare and
health coverage, and that will allow folks to be able to purchase the coverage that they
want.
Yes, sir.
Q    Thank you, Dr. Price.  I have two questions for you.  First has to do with guarantees that
you can make as the administration’s point person on this legislation.  Can you guarantee
that whatever legislation emerges and makes it to the President’s desk will allow
individuals, if they like their doctor they can keep their doctor?  And the second guarantee
is, can you also guarantee that healthcare premiums for individuals will come down with
this new legislation?
SECRETARY PRICE:  Again, a remarkably important question because, as you’ll recall, the
promise from the last administration was if you like your doctor you can keep your doctor, if
you like your plan you can keep your plan.  Both of those promises turned out to be not true.
We think it’s incredibly important for the American people to be able to select the physician
and the place where they’re treated themselves, that the government ought not be involved
in that process.  And so our goal is absolutely to make certain that individuals have the
opportunity to select their physician.
In terms of premiums, we believe strongly that through this whole process and as it takes
e瘎�ect, that we’ll see a decrease in not only the premiums that individuals will see, but a
decrease in the cost of healthcare for folks.  Remember, that was another promise that the
previous administration made, that you’d see a decrease in $2,500 on average for families
across this land; in fact, what they’ve seen is an increase of $2,500 or $3,000.
So we’re going to go in the other direction.  We’re going to go in a direction that empowers
patients and holds down costs.  
Yes.
Q    Mr. Secretary, you are quite a distance away from conservatives with this plan in the
central part of it, which is tax credits, which they see as yet another entitlement, very similar
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

5/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

to the entitlement of Obamacare but di瘎�erent in form.  How do you convince them, since it’s
going to take tax credits to make this work, that they need to swallow this and move
forward with the bill?  I mean, you’re getting an awful lot of opposition on the central tenet
of this whole thing.
SECRETARY PRICE:  This is all about patients.  And in order to provide that transition and in
order to make it so that nobody falls through the cracks.  We've got to have a system that
allows for individuals to gain the kind of coverage that they want.  
And we, conservatives and others, have said for a long, long time that we believe it's
important to equalize the tax treatment for those purchasing coverage, gaining coverage
through their employer, and those not.  And the tax credit is the opportunity to be able to
equalize that tax treatment.  Folks have talked about this for many, many years, actually, so
that there's not a distortion in the tax code for who's able to gain a benefit for being able to
purchase coverage and not.
Q    Sir, Mr. Secretary, you were talking about making sure people don't fall through the
cracks.  The last administration, with Obamacare, focused in on making sure the
underserved were part of the equation.  What is the safety net or the safeguard that you
have to make sure -- to ensure people don't fall through the cracks beyond the tax
incentives, but also for the underserved, who are now part of -- many are now part of the
program that weren't before, prior to Obamacare.
SECRETARY PRICE:  Yes, this is extremely important as well.  And the current system, as you
likely know, for those vulnerable in our population, especially in the Medicaid population,
this is a system that's broken.  You've got a third of the physicians in this country -- one-third
of the doctors in this country that would be eligible to see Medicaid patients who aren't
seeing Medicaid patients right now.  And it's not because they've forgotten how to take care
of patients, it's because of the rules that are in place that make it too onerous or too di瘎�icult
for them to see Medicaid patients.
So we believe that it's important to allow states to have that flexibility to fashion the
program for their vulnerable population that actually responds to that population in a way
that gives them the authority, them the choices, them the opportunity to gain coverage and
the care that they believe most appropriate.
Q    What if you find out that that is not happening when you give it to the states?  Is there
some type of punishment or some type of piece that you're going to put in place to make
sure that that happens, that they follow through on your intent?
SECRETARY PRICE:  Yes, absolutely.  There's accountability throughout the plan that we
have that would allow for the Secretary and the Department to be certain that the
individuals that we believe need to be cared for are being cared for in the state at the
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

6/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

appropriate level.  But we believe this is a partnership.  This is about patients and
partnership.
The previous administration tended to make it about government.  We believe it's about
patients and partnership, and we want to partner with every single person in this land who
wants to make certain that we allow the kind of choices and quality to exist.
Q    The President tweeted earlier today.  He described this bill as "our wonderful new
healthcare bill."  There's been a little bit of confusion.  Does this represent the
administration's bill?  And is there anything in this bill that the administration cannot
support?
SECRETARY PRICE:  This has been a work in progress.  As you know, this has been going on
for over a year.  The work that I had the privilege of participating in when I served in the
House of Representatives in the last Congress was open and transparent and we invited
folks in to give their ideas.  And tens, if not hundreds, of people had input into that process.
This grew out of that, and over the past number of weeks, we've been having conversations
with folks on the Hill, in the House and in the Senate, and other stakeholders.  And so this is
a work product that is a result of all of that process.  The President and the administration
support this step in the right -- what we believe is in the right direction, a step that repeals
Obamacare and gets us moving in the direction of those principles that I outlined.
Q    Do you support everything that’s in that bill that's sitting on the table, sir?  Do you
support everything that's in the bill sitting on the table, sir?
SECRETARY PRICE:  This is a work in progress and we'll work with the House and the Senate
in this process.  As you know, it's a legislative process that occurs.  I'm glad you pointed out
the bill is on the table there.  As you'll see, this bill right here was the bill that was
introduced in 2009 and '10 by the previous administration.  Notice how thick that is.  Some
of you will recall that I actually turned the pages and went through that piece of legislation
in a YouTube.  The pile on the right is the current bill.  
And what it means is that we are making certain that the process, that the decisions that are
going to be made are not going to be made by the federal government.  They're going to be
made by patients and families and doctors.
One last -Q    Mr. Secretary, given the opposition that John and others have brought up here today,
does this plan already need to be salvaged in your view?  And how do you do it?
SECRETARY PRICE:  Oh, no.  You know what happens with these things.  You start at a
starting point, people engage and they get involved in the process, sometimes to a greater
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

7/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

degree.  Nothing focuses the mind like a bill that's currently on the table and that has a -- as
a work in progress -- or in process.  And we’ll work through it. 
Q    So this is a starting point here?
SECRETARY PRICE:  This is an important process to be had.  The American people have said
to their elected leaders that the Obamacare process for them gaining coverage and care is
not working.  That's what they've said.  And so we believe it’s important to respond to the
American people and provide a healthcare system that allows for them to purchase the kind
of coverage and care that they desire.
Yes.
Q    You said in your letter to the House chairman that necessary technical and appropriate
changes might need to be made for this bill to reach the President’s desk.  So what specific
changes is the White House and the administration looking for in this bill?
SECRETARY PRICE:  Well, as I mentioned, there are three di瘎�erent phases to this process.
 One is this bill, this legislation that's working through under the rules of reconciliation,
which is a fancy term to mean that there are only certain things that you can do from a
budgetary standpoint has to a瘎�ect either spending or revenue.  There are things that you
can't do in this bill, and those we plan on doing across the horizon in phase two, which is
the regulatory portion, and then in phase three, which is another piece of legislation that
would be going through the House and the Senate with a majority -- supermajority in the
Senate.
That process will incorporate all of the kinds of things that we believe are absolutely
necessary to reconstitute that individual and small-group market and to get us in a position,
again, where patients and families and docs are making these decisions.
Q    Mr. Secretary, bearing in mind that the CBO score isn’t back yet, can you guarantee that
this plan will not have a markedly negative impact on deficit or result in millions of
Americans losing health insurance?
SECRETARY PRICE:  What I can say is that the goal and the desire I know of the individuals on
the Hill is to make certain that this does not increase the cost to the federal government. 
Q    Mr. Secretary, two elements of the bill.  I have questions about how they control costs
and how they help with access.  The Medicaid per-capita block grant through the states,
how is that sort of fundamentally di瘎�erent from the Obamacare regime on Medicaid in
terms of expanding access?
And then the second point, why doesn't this bill do away with the cost-sharing community
ratings regime that Obamacare had?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

8/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

SECRETARY PRICE:  So the per-capita cap, Medicaid, again, is a system that doesn't work for
patients.  You’ve got folks out there who need care, who need to see particular physicians
who aren’t able to see them.  All Americans should be saddened by the situation that we
have when there are patients out there that can't get the care that they need.  We believe
one of the keys to providing appropriate care in the Medicaid population is allowing the
states to have the flexibility to address that Medicaid population.
Remember, Medicaid population is four di瘎�erent demographic groups.  It’s those who are
disabled, it’s those who are seniors, it’s healthy moms and kids, by and large.  Those are the
four main demographic groups.  And we, the federal government, force states, mostly, to
take care of those individuals in exactly the same way.  If you describe that to the folks back
home on Main Street, they say, that doesn't make any sense at all.  You need a program
that's di瘎�erent for the healthy moms and kids to respond to their needs that's di瘎�erent than
folks who are disabled and seniors.
And so what we believe is appropriate is to say to the states, you know your population
best.  You know best how to care for your vulnerable population.  We're going to watch you
and make certain that you do so, but you know how to do that.  And that will decrease costs
markedly in the Medicaid program.  We're wasting significant amounts of money -- not that
folks are getting too much care, we're wasting it because it’s ine瘎�icient and there’s
significant abuse in the system. 
So in terms of the cost-sharing, I think that the cost-sharing measures are being addressed.
 It's important that we run through that process.  This is the process where we felt the
previous administration was spending money that they didn't have the authority to spend,
and Congress is working through that to make certain that the rightful holders of the
authority to spend money in this nation, which is the Congress of the United States,
exercises that authority.
Q    How does the White House and you feel about the label “Trumpcare”?
SECRETARY PRICE:  I'll let others provide a description for it.  I prefer to call it patient care.
 This is about patients at the end of the day.  This isn't about politicians.  This isn't about
insurance companies.  This is about patients.  And patients in this nation, especially those in
the individual and small-group market, these are the folks.
I had the privilege of going to Cincinnati last week with the Vice President to a smallbusiness roundtable.  And one of the business owners, one of the small-business owners
there, said he had 18 employees last year at this time.  This year, he has 15 employees -- not
because he doesn't have the work, but because of the cost of health coverage for those
individuals forced him -- forced him -- to let three people go.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

9/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

Now, they're being forced to let three people go because the federal government has put in
place rules and regulations that make it virtually impossible for folks in the individual and
small-group market to provide coverage for their employees.  This is a system that's not
working for people.  So if we focus on the patients -- I'll call it patient care.  If you focus on
the patients, we'll get to the right answer.
Q    Mr. Secretary, a major complaint -- sorry -- a major complaint of conservatives with
phase one of the Obamacare repeal-and-replace is that it is missing a measure that would
allow healthcare to be sold across state lines.  Now, the President said this morning that
that would be in either phase two or phase three.  Is that something that you believe the
President could do through executive action, and then you yourself could do?  Or is that
something that you believe has to be addressed legislatively?
SECRETARY PRICE:  There are di瘎�erent aspects to the purchase across state lines that will
allow individuals to gain, again, the kind of choices that they want.  Some of this might be
able to be done from a regulatory or a rules standpoint.  Some of it will require legislation,
and that's where we're going to need the assistance of our friends on the other side of the
aisle.  
The American people have demanded that they be able to purchase coverage across state
lines, purchase coverage that they want for themselves.  So whether it's through association
health plans, which allows individuals who are in small-business groups, like the fellow that
I just mentioned, to pool together nationally to be able to purchase coverage, or whether it's
mom and dad, who don't gain coverage through their employer through something called
individual health pools that allows folks to pool together solely for the purpose of
purchasing coverage, even though they're not otherwise economically aligned.  That allows
people -- there are 18 million folks in that individual and small-group market.  That would
allow those individuals to be able to purchase coverage and get the purchasing power of
millions.  That's huge power and authority that we want to put in the hands of people, that
we want to put in the hands of patients.  And some of that may, in fact, require legislation.
Yes, sir.
Q    Mr. Secretary, thank you.  Two questions but first, Congressman John Faso of New York
has said that the issue of denying federal funds to Planned Parenthood should be separate
from whatever healthcare bill finally emerges from Congress and is signed into law by the
President.  Is that the administration's position as well?  
And my second question is this.  You mentioned earlier the people who had their  healthcare
plans cancelled when they thought they could keep it.  I believe in your state of Georgia,
more than a million people had that experience.  Will some of the plans that were cancelled
be able to come back under the new healthcare plan?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

10/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

SECRETARY PRICE:  Yeah, in terms of Planned Parenthood, we think it's important that the
legislature work its will on this process.  It's incredibly important that we not violate
anybody's conscience.  We want to protect the conscience provisions that exist.  It's also
important to appreciate that through community health centers, the bill that's being
proposed right now would allow greater access for women to healthcare in greater numbers
of facilities across this land.  And they've actually proposed more money for women's
healthcare than currently exists.  So I think that they're working their best to address that
issue.
In terms of whether or not old plans that were available before might be available,
absolutely.  And we believe that the opportunity to provide a robust market, robust choices
for individuals across this land will be secured.  And, again, that's one of the keys to bringing
down the premium costs, of bringing down the cost for health coverage.  So we're excited
about that and look forward to that coming to pass.
Q    If the new plan calls for repealing the revenue-generating taxes and penalties but
keeping the entitlements, how is that sustainable?
SECRETARY PRICE:  That's the work that somebody mentioned over here -- the
Congressional Budget O瘎�ice score, and once the Congress receives that score, then they'll
be working through that to make certain that in fact it is fiscally responsible.  
Imagine, if you would, however, a system where the incentives within the system are all to
drive down costs, to provide greater choices and competition for folks, and respond to the
specific needs of patients.  And in so doing, what you do is actually get a much more
e瘎�icient system for the provision and the delivery of healthcare.  It's a system we don't have
right now because the previous administration felt that the government -- the federal
government ought to do all of this.  And we've seen what came about when the federal
government does all of that -- that it’s increasing premiums, increasing deductibles,
decreasing choices.  You've got a card that says you've got insurance, and you walk in, and
you can't a瘎�ord what it is that's trying to -- for the doctor that's trying to take care of you.
So this is not a system that's working for folks in that individual and small-group market
and in the exchanges.
Q    Mr. Secretary, many have complained that Obamacare resulted in higher wait times in
the emergency room.  Will this new bill cause that?  Have you have any idea on that?
SECRETARY PRICE:  One of the things that the previous administration said was that they
were going to be able to drive folks away from one of the most expensive areas for the
provision of healthcare, and that is the emergency rooms.  In fact, they did just the
opposite.  And much of that is because of, again, the rules and the regulations that they put
in place.  
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

11/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

So from our perspective, we believe that if individuals are able to purchase the kind of
coverage that they want, then they'll have access to the kind of doctors and other providers
that they desire, and won't need to be able to be seen in the emergency room.  They'll
already have the care.  Emergency rooms ought to be for emergencies, not for the standard
care that individuals tend to receive right now.  
So we believe that if you put in place the right system, then emergency rooms and
emergency physicians will be able to have the opportunity to care for those individuals that
appropriately present to their department.
Q    Mr. Secretary, I'm interested in following up on your comment that it's important that no
one vote on anything that violates their conscience.  Federal funding already can't be used
for abortions, but are you saying that the administration has a position on provision of birth
control at these community health centers?  And secondly, is the administration looking to
actively withhold funding to Planned Parenthood if they continue to provide abortions, as
has been reported?
SECRETARY PRICE:  We're working through all of those issues.  As you know, many of those
were through the rule-making process and we're working through that.  So that's not a part
of this piece of legislation right here.
Q    But you don’t have a view on provision of birth control and access to it?  When you're
talking about women's healthcare, which you brought up, and saying you wanted to expand
more community funding.
SECRETARY PRICE:  Yeah, what we're doing, as I say, is working through the rules and the
regulations to see where the previous administration was, see how they did it, and whether
or not it needs to be addressed.  With the understanding that what we believe is important
when we look at the rules and regulations is to define whether or not that rule or regulation
actually helps patients and decreases costs, or harms patients and increases costs.  If it
does the latter, then we need to do away it.  If it does the former, then we ought to
accentuate it.  
Q    What was the issue of conscience you were talking about?  What was the issue of
conscience you were talking about then?
SECRETARY PRICE:  To make certain that individuals in the market are not forced to do
things that violate their conscience.
Yes, sir.
Q    Secretary, thank you, sir.  Common people and the small businesses have been waiting
for this new bill under President Trump.  So any message, sir, for them?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

12/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

SECRETARY PRICE:  Well, I think that this is the culmination of years of work.  It's the
culmination of years of concern and frustration by the American people.  They knew at the
time that the previous bill -- the previous law passed that it wasn't going to help them.  They
knew that costs were going to go up.  In fact, we predicted at the time that costs would go
up and that access would go down.  And so this is the culmination of years of hard work by
the electorate, by the citizens of this country to say that we want a system, again, that
respects patients and families and doctors in these decisions.
One more.
Q    Thank you, Mr. Secretary.  The President tweeted out earlier today that he believes that
he’s working on a plan to have drug prices come down by spurring competition.  Can you tell
us a little bit about what that plan is going to be, when it might be rolled out?  Is it part of
these phases?  And then the second question, the bill also includes a tax break for insurance
executives that make more than $500,000.  You said this is about patients.  Why is that tax
break important for this legislation?
SECRETARY PRICE:  To the latter, I'm not aware of that.  I'll look into that.
Drug pricing is really important.  So many individuals are now having significant di瘎�iculty
being able to a瘎�ord the medications that they’ve been prescribed.  And it's not able to be
addressed specifically in this phase one because it's not a revenue or spending issue for the
federal government.  So it can't be in this phase one.
But in phase two and three -- which may be concurrent along with this phase one -- but in
phase two and three, then we look forward to bringing solutions, to solve the remarkable
challenge that patients have across this line with the increase in pricing of drugs.  
I've got to run.  You’ve got a guy right here who is going to answer all the rest of the
questions.  Thank you so much.  God bless you.
MR. SPICER:  Thank you, Dr. Price.
Let me just kind of continue on.  The bottom line I think that the Secretary was making is
that Obamacare sought to cover 20 million people and in the process it drove up costs for
everybody, whether or not you were in the exchange or not.  Most people get their insurance
through their employers.  Older populations get their healthcare through Medicare.  Lowincome populations get their healthcare through Medicaid.  And veterans get their insurance
through TRICARE.  So what we're talking about here is a very defined amount of individuals
that we’re trying to address and not a瘎�ect the entire system.
Obamacare turned our healthcare system on its head to address the pool of individuals who
don't fall into any of the buckets that I mentioned.  Our plan that we're talking about today
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

13/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

with the House will ensure that those individuals receive the care that they need if they
want an a瘎�ordable cost while not sending rates skyrocketing.
Obamacare was an overcomplicated bill that served the special interests and not the
American people.  These over 974 pages that were passed and then we were told we had to
read them are filled with carve-outs by over $1 billion of healthcare- related lobbying that
were spent on the year that Obamacare was cra著�ed.  
Our plan, in far fewer pages, 123 -- much smaller, much bigger -- so far we're at 57 for the
repeal plan and 66 pages for the replacement portion.  We'll undo this.  And remember, half
of it, 57 of those pages, are the repeal part.  So when you really get down to it, our plan is 66
pages long, half of what we actually even have there.  We'll undo the massive disaster and
replace it with a plan to return healthcare back to the patient.
As the President outlined in his joint address, he expects five core principles to guide
Congress through this healthcare process.  First, ensure that the American people with
preexisting conditions have access to coverage.  Second, ensure a stable transition for
Americans currently enrolled in the exchanges.  Third, provide more equitable tax treatment
through tax credits for people who already don't receive tax-advantage healthcare from
their employer.  And I know -- something that Secretary Price was talking about -- for the
vast number of people who get their insurance through their employer, they’re getting it tax
free.  They are not taxed on that benefit, which is something that is not a瘎�orded to people
who are in the individual market who either run a small business or are sole proprietors.
Fourth, we should expand the power of health savings accounts to return control to
Americans over their healthcare dollar and decisions.  They should be able to choose the
plan they want, not the plan that's forced on them by government.  And finally, we should
give our state governors the resources and flexibility they need with Medicare to make sure
that no one is le著� out.  
This is the Obamacare replacement plan that everyone has been asking for, the plan that
the President ran on, and the plan that will ultimately save the system.  It's also a
culmination of years of dedicated work and careful thought by Republicans to find a
replacement that will best undo the damage that's been caused by Obamacare while
ensuring that all Americans have peace of mind during this stable transition period.
These are the principles for which conservatives have been fighting for for years.  President
Trump looks forward to continuing the dialogue between the administration and the Hill on
saving the healthcare system.
What’s important to remember is that we’re not going to be able to do all of this on one bill.
 As the Secretary mentioned, there are two other steps as well that allow us to get more of
the President's plan accomplished a著�er we pass this first important, major step. 
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

14/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

The second piece is already underway, and that's what Secretary Price can do through
executive action.  He has already rolled out a handful of important actions, including the
major marketplace stabilization regulation, to help bring stability to the collapsing
insurance market.  He’ll continue to enact a number of policy changes in the regulatory and
administration space -- administrative space to achieve what the first step cannot because
of the nature of reconciliation.
The third piece of executing the President's healthcare plan is on -- requires 60 votes in
legislation, maybe more depending on what we can do and when.  That's how we'll move
forward on the policies of purchasing across state lines, lowering drug prices -- that just
came up -- and repealing any of Obamacare's premium-spiking insurance market distortions
that can't be done through this current bill. 
Also, yesterday, in addition to speaking with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, the President
also had separate calls with Prime Minister of Japan, Abe, and South Korea’s Acting
President Hwang.  During both of these calls the President reiterated the United States’
ironclad commitment to stand with Japan and South Korea in the face of the serious threat
posed by North Korea. 
He also emphasized that the administration is taking steps to further enhance our ability to
deter and defend against North Korea’s ballistic missiles using a full range of the United
States’ military capabilities. 
Moving on to today’s schedule.  This morning, the President had a call with President
Kenyatta of Kenya.  We’ll have a readout for that call soon, if it’s not already out.  The
President and First Lady also announced the o瘎�icial reopening of public tours here at the
White House.  You may have seen the President stop by to surprise greet some of the first
visitors on their tour.  We’re looking forward to welcoming the people back to -- the
American people back what is a瘎�ectionately referred to as the “People’s House.” 
We are the world’s only executive residence and o瘎�ice of head of state that also serves as a
museum free to the people.  Visiting the White House is obviously an experience that’s
uniquely American, and we encourage guests of all ages to come visit the White House, their
house.
Also this morning, the Secretary of Commerce, Wilbur Ross, held a press conference
announcing that Chinese ZTE Corporation has agreed to a record-high, combined criminal
and civil penalty of $1.19 billion a著�er the company illegally shipped telecommunications
equipment to Iran and North Korea in violation of sanctions.  This civil penalty is the largest
ever imposed by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security and, pending
approval from a federal judge, the combined penalties between the Commerce Department,
the Department of Justice, and the Department of Treasury would be the largest fine and
forfeiture ever levied by the U.S. government in such a case.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

15/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

This settlement tells the world that the days of flouting the U.S. sanctions regime or
violating U.S. trade laws are over.
President Trump is committed to ending the disrespect of American laws and American
workers.
So back to the schedule for a second.  This morning the President also received his daily
intelligence briefing.  He had lunch with Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, who
will continue to be an important partner as the President’s nominee for Supreme Court,
Judge Gorsuch, begins the confirmation process in the next couple weeks.
At this moment, the President is leading a discussion on immigration with Senator Cotton
and Senator Perdue and members of White House senior sta瘎�.  The President and the
senators are expected to discuss the merit-based immigration reforms that the President
mentioned at last week’s joint address.  
Later this a著�ernoon, the President will lead a meeting with the House Deputy Whip Team
focused on repeal and replace of Obamacare.  There will be a pool spray at the top of that
meeting.  The gather time is 3:20 p.m.  The President will also meet with Richard Trumka,
President of the AFL-CIO.  They’re expected to discuss the importance of investing in our
country’s infrastructure and renegotiating trade agreements like NAFTA.  There will also be a
pool spray at the top of that meeting, and we’ll have further details on it.
This evening, the President will visit with a group of Boy Scouts who are in Washington to
participate in a near-century-old tradition of sharing scouting’s achievement with key
government o瘎�icials.  Looking ahead, I want to let you know that the President will be
welcoming at least two foreign leaders in the coming weeks, and I expect additional
announcements of additional leaders later.  But first, next week, Chancellor Merkel of
Germany will visit the White House.  And the following week, the President will welcome
Prime Minister al-Abadi of Iraq.  
With that, I’ll kick it o瘎� with your questions.  Jonathan Karl.
Q    Sean, it’s been a full -MR. SPICER:  Jonathan.
Q    Thank you.  (Laughter.)  Sean, it’s been a full -MR. SPICER:  You’re out of practice.
Q    I know.  (Laughter.)  It’s been a full three days since the President said that President
Obama had his wires tapped, his phones tapped at Trump Tower.  In those three days, has
the White House come up with any evidence whatsoever to prove that allegation?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

16/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

MR. SPICER:  I addressed this multiple times yesterday.  I think the President -- we put out a
statement on Sunday saying that we would have no further comment and we were asking
the House and the Senate intelligence committees to look into this concern and report back.
Q    Can’t the President just ask the FBI director if this happened?  Has he asked him?
MR. SPICER:  Look, I think -- no, the President has not.  And I think that we’ve gone back and
forth with you guys -- I think there is clearly a role that Congress can play in its oversight
capabilities.  They’ve made it very clear that they have the sta瘎�, the resources and the
process.  I think that’s the appropriate place for this to handle.  I think if we were to start to
get involved you would then write stories about how we were getting involved.
So it’s a no-win situation.  I think the smartest and most deliberative way to address this
situation is to ask the House and Senate intelligence committees who are already in the
process of looking into this to look into this and other leaks of classified information that
are troubling to our nation’s national security.
So, as the President said in the statement on Sunday, we believe that that investigation, as
well as the investigation of other classified leaks and other important information that
threatens our national security, be looked into by the House and Senate intelligence
committees, and then we encourage them to report back.
Q    Do you believe that President Obama ordered something like this?
MR. SPICER:  I get that that’s a cute question to ask.  My job is to represent the President and
to talk about what he’s doing and what he wants.  And he has made very clear what his goal
is, what he would like to have happen.  And so I’ll just leave it at that.  I think we’ve tried to
play this game before.  I’m not here to speak for myself, I’m here to speak for the President
of the United States and our government.
Zeke.
Q    Sean, one follow-up on what Secretary Price said earlier.  I think he was asked by John
about whether the administration was willing to make a -- for the American people right
now who like their doctor or like their health insurance plan, is the White House willing to
make a commitment then today that when this replacement bill is passed, if it passes, that
they will at the end of that be able to keep their doctor and keep their healthcare plan?
And secondly, just changing gears radically onto -- China overnight issued some strong
rhetoric promising consequences for the deployment of the THAAD missile system to South
Korea.  If you could respond to that.
MR. SPICER:  So on the first piece, I think -- look, one of the things that’s important to
understand about this process that’s very di瘎�erent from when the Democrats did it -- you’ll
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

17/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

recall then-Speaker Pelosi said you’re going to have to read the bill to know what’s in it.  I
think there’s a big di瘎�erence.
This is the bill.  It’s right here.  It’s on the website.  We’re going through regular order.  If you
go to the House of Representatives website, Speaker Paul Ryan’s website, it’s listed.
 Everybody can read it, and it’s going to go through what they call regular order.  We’re not
jamming this down anybody’s throat.  It’s going to go through a committee process.  All
parties involved, all representatives in the House will be able to have input into it.  
I think that’s the way to conduct this process, is to do it to allow people to watch the process
happen in the committees, allow members of Congress to have their input in it, to make
amendments, to see that we get the best bill that achieves the goal for the American people.
When it was done the last time, it was jammed down people’s throat, and look what
happened.  You had 974 pages that people struggled to read a著�erwards and figure out what
had just gotten passed, and the consequences were, frankly, devastating.
So to your point about keeping your doctor, in a lot of cases you’ve lost your doctor for a
couple of reasons.  One, they may not participate in the plan.  They may not take insurance
at all anymore.  Two, they may not take Medicaid -- or three, they may not take Medicaid.
 And the list goes on and on about why they might not be there -- or your plan, the plan that
you got is no longer accessible.  
As the Secretary mentioned, one-third of all counties in the United States no longer take
Medicaid -- or, excuse me, have only one plan that you can choose from.  So it’s a fact right
now that you -- in most cases, you have no choice.  In many cases, you’ve lost that ability.  
Our goal is to actually add more choice and more competition.  Right now, the government
tells you, you must have this plan or you will pay a penalty, and within this plan, here’s what
you have to have.  We’ve lost the element of choice and competition in healthcare, and by
bringing all of that back, I think there’s a higher degree of likelihood that you’re going to get
the plan that you want and you’re going to get the doctor you want.  Because it will be your
choice, not the government’s choice.
And that’s a big, big di瘎�erence.  This plan was jammed down everybody’s throat, and the
consequences took their plans away, it took their doctors away, and it drove up costs.  This
plan allows more competition, more people to enter it, and the American people and
patients to make a decision on what plan they want.  If they have a plan and a doctor they
like, then they’re going to choose a plan that allows them to continue with that doctor.  But
there’s going to be more competition and more choice, not less.  And that’s, frankly, what
you have now.  

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

18/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

With respect to China, I think I addressed this yesterday.  We stand shoulder to shoulder
with Japan and South Korea in doing what we can to protect that region in particular from
an attack from North Korea.  We understand the situation and we continue to work with
them.  As I’ve mentioned, the President spoke to both leaders yesterday.  We provided a
readout of those calls.  But we obviously understand the concerns of China, but -- this is a
national security issue for them.
Hunter.
Q    Thank you, Sean.  How concerned is the President with the situation between North
Korea and Malaysia right now?
MR. SPICER:  Well, as I said, I think we're very well aware of the -- what’s going on in the
region.  The President obviously had a conversation with, in particular, the leader -- the
acting President of South Korea last night with respect to what’s going on there.  And again,
I’ll refer that to the National Security Committee to give you further -- Cheryl Bolen.
Q    Thanks, Sean.
MR. SPICER:  Cheryl.  I know, sorry, I forgot you yesterday. 
Q    I appreciate it.  So two questions.  One on healthcare.  If the CBO scores this bill and it
does not provide the amount of coverage that the A瘎�ordable Care Act did, will the President
still support it?
MR. SPICER:  Well, I’m not going to get ahead -- Secretary Price mentioned this -- let’s not
get ahead of the CBO going through this.  But I think, as I mentioned to Zeke, one of the
things that's important to understand there’s -- this is -- this bill has to be done in the
phases that it has to to address the repeal part of it, and the replace part of it.
There are only certain things that we can do through reconciliation.  I know there’s the
regulatory piece that we can do through actions that the Secretary is empowered to do,
frankly, under Obamacare.  And then third is an additional piece of legislation that
addresses things.
But there are cost-saving measures that -- and competition aspects of this that have to be
included in phase two or three because they're not allowed in the reconciliation bill
because of the nature of how reconciliation works on Capitol Hill.
So I think that one of the things that we have to understand is that how that score comes
out from the Congressional Budget O瘎�ice will depend on whether they look at it specifically
with just a phase one or whether they look at it in its totality.  But I’m confident that if you
look at what’s going on right now, Cheryl, it’s unsustainable.  Premiums in state a著�er state,
as Dr. Price mentioned, they're up 25 percent on average.  Arizona is 116 percent.  I think
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

19/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

Oklahoma is the 50s.  Minnesota is in the 40s.  This is unsustainable for a family to continue
to pay the premiums that they have and for individuals, small-business owners, et cetera. 
So the question is, can we allow people to go on this trajectory where more and more of
their paycheck is getting eaten up in a plan that's, frankly, not giving them choice, doctors,
or plans that they want.  This plan I think clearly achieves those goals a lot better.  It gets the
price -- cost containment down.  It gets price control under it.  And it allows doctors and
plans to reengage in the marketplace, as they were prior to this.  And I think that is a major
aspect of it.
Hold on.  Cheryl waited.
Q    Thank you.  From yesterday, I had a nominations question.  Is there something that's
preventing the White House from submitting the nominations of Sonny Perdue for
Agriculture and Alex Acosta for Labor?
MR. SPICER:  I believe Alex Acosta was sent up to the Hill earlier today.  We should have an
announcement o瘎�icially out.  So sometimes there’s a little bit of a lag.  I apologize between
my o瘎�ice and -- but that one is up, and I’ll check on Sonny Perdue.  I think some of it is just
in coordination with the Senate, so pardon my time. 
Q    Thanks, Sean.  I have two questions for you.  First, will the President o瘎�er a correction to
his tweet this morning that states that 122 prisoners were released from Gitmo by the
Obama administration and then returned to the battlefield?  Can you take that first?
MR. SPICER:  Yes, I mean, obviously the President meant in totality the number that had
been released on the battlefield -- that have been released from Gitmo since -- individuals
have been released.  So that is correct. 
Q    Then my second question.  Is the White House concerned about this new information
that came out in WikiLeaks today that U.S. intelligence agencies are potentially, purposely
providing vulnerabilities to tech products here in the United States?
MR. SPICER:  I’m not going to comment on that.  I think obviously that's something that has
not been fully evaluated, and if it was, I would not comment from here on that.
Kevin.
Q    Yes, Sean, I was going to ask about branding.  The President in the past put his name on
buildings and di瘎�erent products.  When it comes to healthcare, does the White House feel
that the bill presented today should be known as “Trumpcare” from here on out?  I know it
was asked of the Secretary.  And at what point do you think that the transition should go
away from Obamacare to the new administration?
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

20/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

MR. SPICER:  Well, as soon as it’s repealed we can get rid of that.  I think that will happen
quickly. 
And as Secretary Price mentioned, I think we're less concerned with labels right now and
more in terms of action and results.  And I think that's what our focus has been is getting
that cost down, getting that choice back that we mentioned.  Yeah.
Q    Sean, DHS is reportedly considering separating families that cross the border illegally.
 How does the President feel about that? 
MR. SPICER:  I’m going to -- that's a DHS matter.  We don't get involved in either Customs or
ICE enforcement.  So I think that's a question better reserved to both DHS and ICE
specifically.
Jim.
Q    Oh, thanks, Sean.  On the Obamacare question, one of the criticisms on this is that there
is still a de facto individual mandate because it allows insurance companies to increase
premiums up to 30 percent of people -- if there’s a gap in coverage.  And I have one more.  
MR. SPICER:  Well, that's not -- the di瘎�erence is under the current bill that's here, if you don't
buy insurance, you pay a fine.  Under the current bill you don't have -- there’s nothing that
mandates you to buy insurance.  That's up to an individual.  So by its very definition, it is not
-- can't be considered that.
What’s your second one?
Q    Well, you don't think it’s a de facto mandate in the sense of there’s a penalty -MR. SPICER:  It can't be.
Q    -- in place as there is now?  Not by the government, but is by the insurance companies.
MR. SPICER:  Right.  But there’s no -- I think you answered your own question on that one.  
Q    I have one more.
MR. SPICER:  Okay.
Q    Another topic.  The President has blamed the Democrats in the Senate for blocking the
Cabinet.  Last Thursday, the Republicans actually called a recess early -- adjourned on
Thursday early.  Previously they called a recess the week before.  Does the President have
any plans to call for the Senate to remain in session and the Congress to stay in session until
they approve the nominees and maybe even also repeal Obamacare?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

21/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

MR. SPICER:  This isn’t a Republican issue.  I mean it’s not Republicans that are playing beat
the clock on a lot of these nominees.  And we've discussed this since the transition time.
 There were several nominees that, frankly, weren’t even considered controversial by the
standards of Senate Democratic leadership, and yet have been held up over and over again.
 I don't think -- that's a very di瘎�erent scenario than going back and being with constituents,
which was on the Senate schedule.  So I don't think -- that's a synonymous thing.
Do we have Michael Medved ready to go for a Skype question?  Michael? 
Q    Yes, hello.  Sean, thank you very much.  Obviously, today there was a big emphasis on
Obamacare, which is profoundly important to the American people.  But it seems that too
o著�en in the last several weeks, the administration has gotten distracted and media have
gotten distracted by talk of wiretapping at Trump Tower, or the President calling his
predecessor a “bad” and “sick guy” or criticizing the ratings of “Celebrity Apprentice.”  Do
you think the White House could do a better job of focusing on the issues that really matter,
the reforms that matter to the American people rather than getting distracted to these
subsidiary conflicts as we move forward into the coming months?
MR. SPICER:  Thanks, Michael.  Respectfully, I would say that we have been focused.  We're
here talking about Obamacare and the need to drive down the cost and access for
healthcare for every American.  I think that's a pretty significant thing to be focused on.
Yesterday, we were talking about the President’s e瘎�ort to continue to keep the nation safe,
to make sure that people aren’t coming into the country who aren’t here for peaceful
purposes.  The President has talked to almost 50 world leaders.  He’s had 30-plus executive
actions on all sorts of stu瘎� from regulatory aspects to things that will create more jobs.  I
think that's a fairly focused e瘎�ort.
That being said, I think, look, whether it was Candidate Trump, President-elect Trump, or
now President Trump, the President has always made it very clear -- or not he made it clear,
but I think the voters made it clear that one of the things that they appreciate about him is
his ability to be authentic and to speak very forcefully and very directly with the American
people.  And that's an aspect that I think was central to why he was elected, is because he’s
not a canned politician that's going to give the same staid answers over and over again.
Sara.
Q    Going back to Fred’s question, conservatives have started to call this “Obamacare Lite.”
 But President Trump has promised to fully repeal Obamacare, but this bill leaves a lot of the
structure of Obamacare intact.  If this is the policy that passes, is President Trump confident
in the future he can say that he fully repealed Obamacare?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

22/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

MR. SPICER:  Yeah, absolutely.  As I mentioned, the first half of the bill that we put forward
repeals it.  There are three things, I mean -- each phase that we've talked about, phase one,
phase two, and phase three, there’s a repeal-and-replace aspect in each one.  But
Republicans and conservatives have been talking about adding competition and driving
costs down for decades now, selling across state lines, small-business pooling.  All of those
things have been part of conservative plans for a long time.  And I think instilling that
competition in it, allowing more access -- I think there is a big di瘎�erence.  
There is no -- we have for the longest time -- if you're a conservative, you think about this
right now that you have -- anyone who has an employer-based -- their job comes from an
employer that gives them healthcare, they're getting a subsidy.  They're getting a credit.
 They don't pay taxes on their healthcare, and their employer doesn't either.  That's a huge
disadvantage to anyone who is a sole proprietor or owns a small business.  
And so, frankly, to allow the playing field to be leveled and allow small businesses, which
are, frankly, the job creators in this country, to allow entrepreneurs and self-starters to get
the same tax treatment that a Fortune 500 company gets you is a very conservative
principle.
And again, look, one of the things that's important, Sara, is for all of the people who have
concerns about this -- especially on the right -- look at the size.  This is the Democrats, this is
us.  You can't get any clearer in terms of this is government, this is not.
And I think that part of the reason the visual is important is that when you actually look at
the di瘎�erence, you realize this is what big government does.  It crowds out competition.  It
drives up prices.  It stifles entrepreneurship and innovation.  Doctors leaving the markets.
 More and more people not taking Medicaid or TRICARE.  That should concern people.  When
you've got veterans that can't -- because most of the time, Medicaid and TRICARE are tied
together.  So when you have those systems not accepted by doctors, that means the lowest
of our -- people on the low-income scale and people who have served our country have
fewer and fewer choices.  That alone should be a problem and concerning for many people.  
But the premium spikes are another problem.  Because again, even if you're in the
exchange, now you're seeing over and over again that happen.  You're also seeing young
people decide that they’d rather just pay a penalty because the cost of those basic
programs is out of reach for a lot of young people who are just entering the job market.
But again, I think the greatest illustration of the di瘎�erences in the approaches is that size.
 Our bill, which is a tenth of the size, does repeal and replace in what their bill just did in
massive government bureaucracy.  And that is a big di瘎�erence.  
Jim.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

23/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

Q    Just want to ask you -- I mean you had the Health and Human Services Secretary out
here, you just talked about this is the Republican bill, this is the Democrat bill.  Is that the
President’s bill?  Is that his healthcare bill?
Q    That is a bill that we have worked with with Congress. We feel very good about where it
is.  We are looking forward -- as I mentioned earlier, the President is meeting with the Whip
Team to encourage them to support it and to build it out.  I don't think -- and I'm not trying
to be cute here -- but I think it's not his bill or their bill.  It's a bill that we have worked on
with them together.  We're very proud of where it stands now.
The big di瘎�erence, Jim, is that, unlike before, as I mentioned, when the Democrats jammed
it down people’s throat and said -- waited to get that 60th vote, with Senator Kennedy still
around, and then basically said, literally, you will have to wait and see what it looks like
before we passed it -- we not only posted it out there for everybody to look at, but by
sending it through regular order, not just putting it up for a House vote, but sending it
through the committee process, allows Republicans, Democrats, and independents alike to
o瘎�er up amendments and suggestions.  And the House will work its will.
Now, we will continue to give guidance and thoughts and suggestions.  But I think the
President’s core principles are what’s going to guide us as we head through the Hill and then
-- the House and then to the Senate.
Q    And just one quick follow-up on Jonathan Karl’s question, because the President made a
very serious allegation over the weekend, and I think we would all be remiss if we went
through this briefing and not tried to get you on camera to at least o瘎�er us some evidence.
 Where is the evidence, where is the proof that President Obama bugged President Trump?
MR. SPICER:  Well, I answered this question yesterday on camera on your air.  So just so
we're clear -- I know this is now -- it will be twice.  But I think I made it clear yesterday -Q    But since yesterday, since yesterday -MR. SPICER:  Nothing has changed.
Q    -- is there any new proof -MR. SPICER:  No.  And it's not a question of new proof or less proof, or whatever.  The answer
is the same, which is that I think that there is a concern about what happened in the 2016
election.  The House and Senate intelligence committees have the sta瘎� and the capabilities
and the processes in place to look at this in a way that's objective.  And that's where it
should be done.  And, frankly, if you’ve seen the response from -- especially on the House
side, but as well as the Senate, they welcome this.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

24/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

And so let’s let the Senate do their job and the House -- excuse me -- intelligence
committees, and then report back to the American people.
Q    Will the President withdraw the accusation?  Does he have any -MR. SPICER:  Why would he withdraw it until it's adjudicated?  That's what we're asking, is
for them to look at this and see if there is -Q    No regrets with him about raising this accusation?
MR. SPICER:  No.  Absolutely not.  And I think that what he wants them to do is to look into
wiretapping, other surveillance, and again, as I mentioned before, the other leaks that are
threatening our national security.  You're seeing the leaks happen over and over again that
come out throughout the administration, throughout government, and undermine national
security.  And I think the appropriate thing to do is to ask the House and the Senate to look
into it.
Glenn Thrush.
Q    To follow up on a follow-up, in terms of -- you were given the opportunity on air to say
whether or not the President still supported Director Comey.  Does the President support
Director Comey?  And I have a quick follow-up.
MR. SPICER:  I have no reason to believe he doesn’t.  He has not suggested that to me.  So
now to the non-follow-up to the -Q    Have you seen any evidence yourself?  Has the evidence been shared with you or other
senior members of the President’s sta瘎� as to why he made this particular accusation?
MR. SPICER:  As far as me, no.  I'm not in a position that that would be regularly part of my
daily duties for the President to sit down and go through that.  That's probably a level above
my pay grade.  But as I’ve mentioned, I think the President believes that the appropriate
place for this to be adjudicated is for the House and Senate intelligence committees who
have the clearances, the sta瘎�, the processes, to go through this, look at it and report back.
Q    Did he share it with -MR. SPICER:  I'm not going to get in -- as the President made very clear, Glenn -Q    -- with his National Security Advisor?
MR. SPICER:  As the President said in the statement that he issued on Sunday, we're not
going to have further comment on this until this matter is resolved.
Yes.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

25/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

Q    Two quick questions.  So just to follow up on the follow-up.  So does the White House
feel that it's appropriate -- you say that you want it to be adjudicated by the congressional
committees, but the President made declarative statements on Twitter.
MR. SPICER:  Right.
Q    So I guess, is the White House position that the President can make declarative
statements about a former President basically committing a crime and then the
congressional committees should look into that and basically prove it?  I mean, how does
that exactly -MR. SPICER:  I take issue with -- it's not a question of “prove it.”  I think as I said, now, five
times to a follow-up to a follow-up, that it's not a question of “prove it.”  It's that they have
the resources and the clearances and the sta瘎� to fully and thoroughly and comprehensively
investigate this and then issue a report as to what their findings are.  
Q    But President Trump’s Twitter statement shouldn’t be taken at face value about what -MR. SPICER:  Sure it should.  Of course, it -- I mean, why 
-- no.  There’s nothing -- as I mentioned to Jim, it's not that he’s walking anything back or
regretting.  He’s just saying that they have the appropriate venue and capabilities to review
this.
Margaret.  I'm sorry.
Q    So on the Obamacare replacement, so you said that it will be in phases and that you're
going to need additional legislation.  So just to clarify, are the cost savings that you guys are
projecting, is that dependent on phase three of the national competition plan?  Because if
that’s the case then --  
MR. SPICER:  Yeah, well, it's not dependent.  I think that in order to see it fully come to
fruition, yeah, you have to see all parts of it.  But the way that it was passed doesn't allow
for -- the way that it was passed is almost the same way that we're going through this now,
which is they pass certain things, then the Secretary of Health and Human Services, at the
time, was granted significant regulatory authority that allowed her to do certain things at
the time to implement pieces of Obamacare that we now have to act backwards and go
almost in the same steps to do what they did to lay it out.  We've got to repeal it, and then
we've got to replace it with the plan that's going to do the same. 
Certain things can be done in the same way and certain things can't.  It just -- it literally
depends on how that was done.
John Frederick.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

26/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

Q    Sean, in the replacement plan, it says that the states that accepted the Medicare
expansion money would continue to be funded.  So what is the message you have to
Republican state legislators that thought they were fiscally responsible in rejecting Medicaid
expansion in their states and now they didn't get the federal dollars on either end?  What is
your response to them?
MR. SPICER:  I think what we need to do is to make sure, as the President said in his
statements, as Secretary Price did, we've got to make sure that we continue to protect
people through this transition process.  Let the bill work its way.  But this is the first time -as we address the Medicaid portion of this, this is probably the first time that we've really
addressed an entitlement aspect of something in almost 30 years.  So I think we've got to let
this piece of it work its way through the House.
But there is -- remember, one of the things that happened through the Medicaid expansion
was the goal has always been about Medicaid to help people who were disabled or poor or
met a specific number of criteria.  For the first time in Obamacare, we expanded Obamacare
-- or the Obama administration did, rather -- to able-bodied individuals that -- in a way that
had never been done before, and it was not a specific class.  That's led largely to the
ballooning cost.
I think a lot of the reforms that will be contained in this bill will address that, but I think
we've got to let it work its will through the process.
Alexis.
Q    Sean, I want to ask you two communications questions on two topics.  Because the
President gave himself a middling grade on communication, let me ask you about the
experience that the previous administration had when Obamacare was going through its
own phases.  The President -- President Obama said that the opposition to the legislation
was able to seize the opportunity while it was being legislated to create public perceptions
about what was in the legislation.  So my question is on ACA.  What is the President going to
do to improve his communications, to be out there, explaining what is in the bill, to work
with lawmakers?  That's the first question.  And then I'll ask you the next one.
MR. SPICER:  Okay, thank you.  So on the first one, as I’ve mentioned, he’s had and continues
to have significant outreach to members of Congress.  He's talked to health insurers.  I
mean, I think we've read out a lot of the activities of the last couple weeks.  And literally, in
just -- within an hour, he's going to sit down with the House Deputy Whip Team to talk about
the legislative piece of this in the House.
So this is going to be a very aggressive, laser-like focus of this administration over the next
month or two to get this thing through the House and then moved over to the Senate.  But
there's a big di瘎�erence, Alexis.  What we're doing is vastly di瘎�erent.  They were expanding
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

27/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

government, promising people something.  And I think what's happened is there was a lot of
di瘎�erence with how they approach it.  
Right now, the American people, no matter where you are, you understand the state of your
healthcare, the costs that you're seeing and the lack of choice that you've now been
presented with.  And in many cases, you realize that when you go in to see the doctor or a
loved one is going to see a doctor that they're not getting -- they're not either able to get in,
they're not taking the Medicare or the exchange insurance that they got, the costs are going
out of control.  
And I think it's really interesting -- I mean, one of the things that Dr. Price mentioned that is
so apropos of this is, having a card does not mean you have insurance.  It's like handing
someone a blank check -- it doesn't mean that you have money, it means you have a check.
 And I think what we've seen over the last few years with Obamacare is you can have an
insurance card, but that doesn't mean someone is going to take it, and it sure doesn't mean
that it's going to be a瘎�ordable.  And there's a big di瘎�erence between having a card and
having healthcare that's a瘎�ordable.  And that's the di瘎�erence that we're trying to solve right
now.  
So when it comes to communication, I think one of the things that's really helpful is that
part of the sell is done for us.  The American people understand the state of their healthcare.
 They understand how much they're paying for.  They've gone to see a doctor or gone to a
hospital or had a notice from their carrier saying we are no longer part of this, or their
employer says, hey, whatever your particular carrier is, is no longer available, we're
switching you into this.  
And so for so many Americans, healthcare is a very, very real part of their daily experience
because they're caring for themselves, they're dealing with an ailment, or dealing with
children or a loved one or someone else in their family where they're seeing, firsthand, the
devastation and disaster that Obamacare has caused them in their personal life.  
So I think there's a welcoming of this e瘎�ort and I think it's a lot easier for us to go in -because we don't have to explain the problem.  People are living it.  And I think for them to
understand what we're giving you is more choice, greater competition.  We're incentivizing
more people to be part of the process, and we're going to be driving down the cost of those
premiums.
You had a second.
Q    My second question on communications has to do with the President's assertion about
the wiretapping.  Because the White House wants this now to be handled by the legislative
branch, and in confidence and in classification, can we count on the President to, himself,
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

28/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

while this investigation is going on, to cease and desist using Twitter or any other public
venue to make accusations that are in public but he will not respond to in public?
MR. SPICER:  With respect to this particular situation?  I'll ask that and I'll get back to you on
that.
John Gizzi.
Q    Thank you, Sean.  Just getting back to the question about if one likes his or her
healthcare, they can keep it.  In 2013, Congressman Fred Upton, then Chairman of the
House Energy Committee, o瘎�ered legislation that put precisely those words into law and it
received the votes of every Republican member in the House and between 40 and 50
Democrats, and then it died in the Senate.  Would the administration support a revival of
the Upton Amendment?  In other words, putting the right to keep one's healthcare plan and
doctor if he or she liked it, today?
MR. SPICER:  I mean, I think that's the goal.  I don't want to start talking about what we're
going to -- as we go through the process.  We've now put our stamp on this and sent it to the
House.  It will work its will as amendments come up through regular order.  Our team will
weigh in on those with their sta瘎� and, again, the President is meeting with the Whip Team
today.
I don't want to start saying we're going to support this amendment or that amendment
now, but I think generally speaking, obviously the goal is to make sure that people get a
plan that they like that's a瘎�ordable, that meets what they need to have met, that they
shouldn't have to have a one-size-fits-all, government-instilled healthcare system that
doesn't o瘎�er any choice or, frankly, isn't tailored to the needs that they have.  I think that's
an important thing.
John.
Q    Sean, right now you're two votes short of passing repeal-and-replace in the Senate
because you've got four Republican senators who are saying they can't support the bill
because of rolling back the Medicaid expansion.  What do you say to those senators who are
very concerned that people will lose coverage that this does not provide enough stability for
those people who rely on Medicaid for their healthcare?
MR. SPICER:  Well, there's two things, John.  One is, we're at day one.  We're going to go
through the House first, so we've got a little bit of time.  And I think as we go through that
process, these senators -- and not just the additional two but I think and hope that we'll get
additional ones -- they recognize that those people, as I've said over and over again here -- if
we do nothing, they're going to be in a very, very worse scenario than they are now.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

29/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

More and more people -- if you're on Medicaid, which serves so many low-income
Americans, as I mentioned, they have a card.  And that card does not allow them to go to
doctor a著�er doctor who are saying, we're not going to take Medicaid or TRICARE anymore.  
So I would ask those senators, what are you doing to help us work on a bill that will get
them insured again?  Because for too many Americans, they've got a card, but they don't
have insurance.  And I think that's a very, very big thing to -- a distinction to make.
They're the ones who have the problem right now.  They've got a Medicaid card and
nowhere to go.  And what we need to do is to make sure that low-income Americans,
veterans, small business owners, individuals who desperately need healthcare have options
and a瘎�ordability.
Q    One other piece of this.  You could bring down the cost of the insurance itself through
e瘎�iciencies in the system, selling across state lines.  But the biggest driver of the increase in
health insurance cost is the skyrocketing cost of medicine.  What in this overall plan do you
propose to do to either cap the rise or even bring it down?
MR. SPICER:  Well, I think you -- the Secretary mentioned this, but I mean, the cost of
prescription drugs is -- 
Q    That's one small -- 
MR. SPICER:  No, it's not.  It's a big factor.  I think that -- 
Q    But when you're paying $50,000 out of pocket to get a stent?  I mean, it's -- 
MR. SPICER:  Again, what is the biggest thing missing -- 
Q    -- but it's getting out of control.
MR. SPICER:  Fair enough, but -- 
Q    Fair enough, drugs is one part of it but -- huge other part of it.
MR. SPICER:  Okay, when you talk about procedures or drugs, the biggest thing that's
missing in this whole equation is competition.  I mean, we're down to one plan in many
places.  There's nothing for these places to compete -- 
Q    There’s plenty of competition between hospitals.
MR. SPICER:  No, there's -- I mean, that's fine, but if they know they're going to get the same
reimbursement rate, if they know that there's no other options, that plans aren't trying to
get people -- then that's a big di瘎�erence.  Right now, there's a lack of competition in the
industry.  
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

30/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

And I think one of the President's -- I get it may be one part of that, but you're right, that allover medicine -- procedures and such -- there's a reason he met with drug executives and
talked about getting those costs down; that there's a multi-faceted approach, and how do
we instill competition, how do we drive down costs?  
But you're right, we've got to do more to get the cost of that down, of the procedures to
allow additional options.  Everything that is -- it's the same way that, again -- think about
your insurance.  One of the things that was driving up cost in the past was people were
exercising the option of going to an emergency room over and over again for their primary
care.  And what happened is that you saw all of these "clinics" pop up from around and
insurance carriers actually made it cheaper in terms of co-pays to go see that than an
emergency room, driving people to somewhere that didn't continue to drive up cost, clog
insurance.  That competition alone starts saving the plans money and helping to keep cost
down.  We've got to instill more aspects of competition in medicine.
Jennifer.
Q    Sean, can you give us an update on the e瘎�ort to roll back regulations?  Have the
taskforce -- regulatory reform taskforces identified any regulations to roll back?  And have
any actually been repealed?
MR. SPICER:  I think that they have had their work cut out for them.  They’ve started as they
-- the President has met with di瘎�erent industries and companies, corporations,
associations.  That is a constant subject of discussion, which is those regulatory aspects of
our economy that are keeping companies from growing, expanding and hiring.  And so I
know that the domestic policy team and others have been working on that.  And if I can get
further updates on specific legislation or, excuse me, specific regulatory action, I'll get back
to you.
Hallie.
Q    Thanks, Sean.  Two topics for you.  I'm trying to get some clarity on something that my
colleagues have tried to follow up on as well.  You've said that the President stands by his
tweets Saturday morning that President Obama ordered this wiretap.  You've also said that
the administration wants Congress -- let me just be clear -- he found out this information.
 You've also said that the President wants Congress to investigate.  Some members of
Congress, by the way, have asked the White House and asked the President to come forward
with that information.  So bottom line, why would the President want Congress to
investigate for information he already has?
MR. SPICER:  I think there's a separation-of-powers aspect here as I mentioned to Jonathan
that we think it's -- 
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

31/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

Q    Talk about resources and time -- why waste that?
MR. SPICER:  Well, it's not a question of waste it.  It's a question of appropriateness.  
Q    But if the President has the info, Sean -- and I guess that's what I'm trying to get to -- if
he's sitting on this information that he found out, he's now directing or asking or
recommending that the intelligence committees look into this.  And you talked about they
have resources and sta瘎�, which they do, but why expend those resources and sta瘎� if the
President found out this information and has it?
MR. SPICER:  I think there's a di瘎�erence between directing the Department of Justice, which
may be involved in an ongoing investigation, and asking Congress as a separate body to
look into something and add credibility to the look -- adds an element that wouldn't
necessarily be there if we were directing the Department of Justice, for example.  But again,
I think we've made it very clear how he wants this done and where we go from there. 
Q    Second question then.  Millions of Americans are working on their tax returns right now.
 Will the President commit to releasing his tax returns for this year and is he still under audit
for his past returns?
MR. SPICER:  My understanding is he's still under audit and I'll follow up on the question.
Q    Question and quick follow-up.  How do you understand what we've seen on the growing
number of cases at the Canadian border of Canadians born and raised in Canada with valid
passports being stopped at the border and told just to go back?  They won't let them come
in and -- in the U.S.
MR. SPICER:  I'm not aware of that.  I think that's something that probably should be
addressed to the Department of Homeland Security.
Q    Do you think there might be a misunderstanding of the messages sent on the
immigration -MR. SPICER:  I don't know.  I think it's a good question that is probably best directed
towards the Department of Homeland Security.  
Dr. Swan.
Q    Thank you.  Is the White House going to keep its promise to withdraw from the Paris
climate agreement?  And our understanding is that there is some divisions of opinion -- Rex
Tillerson wants to stay in; Steve Bannon wants to get out.  What’s going on?  Will you keep
the promise?  If not, why not?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

32/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

MR. SPICER:  I think that's something I'd be glad to follow up with you and everyone.  I don't
have anything on that right now.  I'm aware of the discussion of it, so let me -- if I can, I'll get
back to you
Mike.
Q    I have an unrelated question, but I also want to follow up on something -MR. SPICER:  Unrelated questions are my favorite.  (Laughter.)
Q    You talked about the communications strategy.  Will the President play a public role in
selling this bill?  Will he speak to the public about it?  Will he answer questions about it?
MR. SPICER:  That's a good question.  I think that we are going to have a very comprehensive
strategy.  As I mentioned, just a few minutes from now the President is going to engage with
members of the House Whip Team to talk to them.  
Q    -- talking to members of Congress.    
MR. SPICER:  I understand that, but -- and I understand that.  This is step one.  There’s a lot
of time -- as I mentioned, we expect to be dealing with this for the next several weeks.  There
will be plenty of opportunities for the President to speak about that, to engage with the
public.  But it's going to be a comprehensive plan that we will discuss.
We had I can't even begin to tell you how many administration folks, members of Congress
flooding the broadcast and radio airwaves today, both nationally and in local markets.  We
were very, very active throughout the country getting out the word on what we're doing and
why we're doing it, from national broadcast shows to cable to -- I mean, to radio.  We had a
very, very aggressive start to this e瘎�ort.  We're working with the House, in particular.  We’re
continuing to start really engaging with the Senate.  
But this is going to be a comprehensive e瘎�ort, working with the House and the Senate, to
get this thing done, and other partners -- doctors and outside groups that share this
concern.  As I mentioned earlier to one of the other folks, there’s a need by companies and
corporations who are feeling the weight of additional cost to join us in this e瘎�ort.  And I just
want -- this is obviously something that needs to get dealt with.  The escalating costs are
having a significant impact not just on our economy, but on the ability of people to get
hired, or, frankly, people who are hired leave their job because the cost of healthcare is not
allowing especially people in the small- and medium-sized businesses to keep up with those
costs.
With that, thank you guys very much.  I look forward to seeing you -Q    -- meeting tomorrow -- congressmen coming to the meeting with the President.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

33/47

3/12/2017

Press Briefing by Press Secretary Sean Spicer, 3/7/2017, #18 | whitehouse.gov

MR. SPICER:  We'll have a readout -Q    Sean, I have that unrelated question, which was -MR. SPICER:  I’m sorry.  That's not fair.  Mike gets his unrelated question.
Q    And answer mine a著�er that, please.
Q    Will the Trump administration continue the Obama administration’s practice of releasing
publicly the visitor logs?
MR. SPICER:  We're currently evaluating our procedures on that and we'll have some -- and
when we have an announcement I'll let you know.
And, April, I'll have a readout on our schedule for tomorrow later.  
Q    He’s meeting tomorrow with -MR. SPICER:  Once it's confirmed, I will let you know first, and then everybody else.  
Thank you, guys.  Have a great day.
END
2:54 P.M. EST


HOME

 BRIEFING ROOM

 ISSUES

 

 



 THE ADMINISTRATION

 PARTICIPATE

 1600 PENN

USA.gov   Privacy Policy   Copyright Policy

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the­press­office/2017/03/07/press­briefing­press­secretary­sean­spicer­372017­18

34/47