State of Hawaii v. Trump
MOTION for Leave to Proceed Under Psyeudonyms and for In Camera Review Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiff State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAII and ISMAIL
Civil No. 17-00050-DKW-KSC
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as
President of the United States; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY; ELAINE DUKE, in her official
capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland
Security; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE;
REX TILLERSON, in his official capacity as
Secretary of State; and the UNITED STATES
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE
FOR DOE PLAINTIFFS TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM, AND FOR
IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DOE PLAINTIFFS’ AND DOE DECLARANTS’
Upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave for Doe Plaintiffs to
Proceed Under Pseudonym, and for In Camera Review of Doe Plaintiffs’ and Doe
Declarants’ Signed Statements (the “Confidentiality Motion”), the Declaration of
Deirdre Marie-Iha in Support of Plaintiffs’ (1) Motion for Temporary Restraining
Order, and (2) Confidentiality Motion (the “Marie-Iha Declaration”), and the files
and records herein, and good cause appearing therefor;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
The Confidentiality Motion is GRANTED. John Doe 1 and John Doe 2,
whose declarations appear in the record as Exhibits A-B to the Marie-Iha
Declaration, are permitted to proceed under the foregoing pseudonyms as Plaintiffs
in this action.
The Court also will review in camera Exhibits A-E to the Marie-Iha
Declaration, submitted to the Court in sealed envelopes, and keep them
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, ______________.
Derrick K. Watson
U.S. District Judge
State of Hawaii, et al. v. Trump, et al., Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00050-DKWKSC; [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
LEAVE FOR DOE PLAINTIFFS TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM, AND
FOR IN CAMERA REVIEW OF DOE PLAINTIFFS’ AND DOE DECLARANTS’
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?