State of Hawaii v. Trump
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order Neal Katyal appearing for Plaintiffs Ismail Elshikh, State of Hawaii (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, # 2 Certificate of Word Count, # 3 Proposed Temporary Restraining Order, # 4 Certificate of Service)(Katyal, Neal)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I
STATE OF HAWAI‘I and ISMAIL ELSHIKH,
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as
President of the United States; U.S.
Civil Action No. 1:17-cvDEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY; 00050-DKW-KJM
JOHN F. KELLY, in his official capacity as
Secretary of Homeland Security; U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE; REX TILLERSON,
in his official capacity as Secretary of State; and
the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that, on the dates and by the methods of service noted below, a true
and correct copy of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order was served
on the following at their last known addresses:
Served Electronically through CM/ECF on March 8, 2017:
Florence T. Nakakuni, Esq.
Edric Ming-Kai Ching
Michelle R. Bennett, Esq.
Brad P. Rosenberg, Esq.
Daniel Schwei, Esq.
DATED: Washington, D.C., March 8, 2017.
/s/ Neal K. Katyal
DOUGLAS S. CHIN (Bar No. 6465)
Attorney General of the State of Hawai‘i
CLYDE J. WADSWORTH (Bar No. 8495)
Solicitor General of the State of Hawai‘i
DEIRDRE MARIE-IHA (Bar No. 7923)
DONNA H. KALAMA (Bar No. 6051)
KIMBERLY T. GUIDRY (Bar No. 7813)
ROBERT T. NAKATSUJI (Bar No. 6743)
Deputy Attorneys General
DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY
GENERAL, STATE OF HAWAI‘I
NEAL K. KATYAL*
COLLEEN ROH SINZDAK*
MITCHELL P. REICH*
THOMAS P. SCHMIDT*
ALEXANDER B. BOWERMAN*
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff, State of Hawai‘i
Attorneys for Plaintiffs, State of
Hawai‘i and Ismail Elshikh
*Admitted Pro Hac Vice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?