Dunstan et al v. comScore, Inc.

Filing 269

DECLARATION of Chandler Givens regarding motion for protective order 268 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G)(Thomassen, Benjamin)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT E Amir Missaghi <amissaghi@edelson.com> Fwd: Dunstan et al. v. comScore, Inc., Case No. 1:11­cv­5807 Chandler Givens <cgivens@edelson.com> Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 4:36 PM To: Robyn Bowland <RobynBowland@quinnemanuel.com> Cc: Rafey Balabanian <rbalabanian@edelson.com>, Jay Edelson <jedelson@edelson.com>, Ben Thomassen <bthomassen@edelson.com>, Andy Schapiro <AndrewSchapiro@quinnemanuel.com>, Stephen Swedlow <StephenSwedlow@quinnemanuel.com>, Paul Stack <pstack@stacklaw.com>, Amir Missaghi <amissaghi@edelson.com> Robyn:   Here’s a quick follow­up from our telephone call earlier today. As I explained, we can’t agree to provide comScore with all of the file listings and web browsing history (“Disputed Data”) from Dunstan’s HD given the data’s highly sensitive nature and the fact that we don’t believe it’s relevant to this lawsuit. Therefore, we plan on filing a motion to exclude the Disputed Data on Monday.    During our call you also said that comScore agreed to extracting e­mail headings from Dunstan’s HD limited to the timeframe that we previously discussed (January 1, 2010 to September 30, 2010). If your expert is able to provide those e­mails to us by this evening, then we’ll attempt to review them for potentially contestable data over the weekend and include them with the other Retrieved Data that we’re giving to comScore on Monday (i.e., the Windows registry, event logs, and log files). If not, then we may need to inform the Court that a few additional days are necessary to complete our review. Please let us know either way.   Have a nice weekend. Thanks, Chandler [Quoted text hidden]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?