Pinero v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. et al

Filing 10

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File Supporting Memorandum in Excess of Permitted Page Limitation by Vicki L. Pinero. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Order, # 2 Motion for Class Certification, # 3 Notice of Hearing Notice of Hearing, # 4 Request for Oral Argument, # 5 Proposed Pleading Memorandum in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 6 Exhibit A)(Shartle, Bryan)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VICKI L. PINERO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE INC.; JACKSON HEWITT INC.; and, CRESCENT CITY TAX SERVICE, INC. d/b/a JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. 08-03535 Sec. R JUDGE SARAH S. VANCE Mag. 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III NOTICE OF MOTION Pursuant to L.R. 78.1, plaintiff, Vicki L. Pinero ("Plaintiff"), submits this notice. Plaintiff will bring for hearing her Motion for Class Certification on the 20th day of August 2008, at 10:00 A.M., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard. 1 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Bryan C. Shartle David Israel (LSBA No. 7174) (T.A.) Bryan C. Shartle (LSBA No. 27640) Harold A. Aucoin (LSBA No. 02601) Justin H. Homes (LSBA No. 24460) SESSIONS, FISHMAN, NATHAN & ISRAEL, L.L.P. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy of the above and foregoing has been forwarded to all counsel of record by email; ___ by hand; ___ by fax; by FedEx; ___ by placing a copy of same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid this 22nd day of July 2008. /s/ Bryan C. Shartle Bryan C. Shartle 3850 N. Causeway Blvd. Lakeway II, Suite 200 Metairie, Louisiana 70002 Telephone: (504) 828-3700 Facsimile: (504) 828-3737 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Vicki L. Pinero N:\1-DI-Non-Collector-Misconduct\Pinero, Vicki-Class Action\Pleadings\LA Lawsuit\Motion for Class Certification\Notice of Motion.doc 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?