Pinero v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. et al

Filing 103

EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Amend/Correct Document Number 77 by Vicki L. Pinero. Motion(s) referred to Daniel E. Knowles, III. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Pleading Third Amended Class Action Complaint, # 2 Proposed Exhibit II, # 3 Proposed Order)(Shartle, Bryan) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/7/2009: # 4 Proposed Exhibit II) (rll, ). Modified on 4/7/2009 to attach corrected Exhibit II (rll, ).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VICKI L. PINERO, individually and on ) behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE ) INC.; JACKSON HEWITT INC.; and, ) CRESCENT CITY TAX SERVICE, INC. ) d/b/a JACKSON HEWITT TAX ) SERVICE, ) ) Defendants. ) Civil Action No. 08-03535 Sec. R JUDGE SARAH S. VANCE Mag. 3 MAGISTRATE KNOWLES, III JUDGE DANIEL E. ORDER CONSIDERING the ex parte motion to amend document number 77 filed by plaintiff, Vicki L. Pinero, and finding that plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought therein; IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff be and is hereby permitted to replace the proposed pleading and Exhibit II referenced in Docket No. 77, with the proposed pleading and Exhibit II attached to her instant motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that said replacement documents, attached to plaintiff's 1 motion, are hereby deemed filed in the record of the above-numbered and captioned matter. New Orleans, Louisiana, this ___ day of April 2009. ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?