Pinero v. Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. et al

Filing 59

MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, MOTION to Strike Class Allegations in Second Amended Complaint by Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc., Jackson Hewitt Inc. Motion Hearing set for 3/4/2009 10:00 AM before Chief Judge Sarah S. Vance. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Motion to Dismiss, # 2 Notice of Hearing, # 3 Memorandum in Support, # 4 Request for Oral Argument, # 5 Exhibit A)(Gray, Veronica) Modified on 2/10/2009 to delete referral & edit text reflect disposition of request for oral argument (rll, ). REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT DOCKETED SEPARATELY

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VICKI L. PINERO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, SECTION R v. JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE INC.; JACKSON HEWITT INC.; and, CRESCENT CITY TAX SERVICE, INC. d/b/a JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE, Defendants. NOTICE OF HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc.'s and Jackson Hewitt Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint will be brought on for hearing at 500 Poydras Street, New Orleans, Louisiana, on the 4th day of March, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard. JUDGE SARAH VANCE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DANIEL E. KNOWLES CASE NO.: 08-3535 Respectfully submitted, __/s/Veronica D. Gray___________ Donna L. Wilson (Admitted pro hac vice) Andrew S. Wein (Admitted pro hac vice) Veronica D. Gray (Admitted pro hac vice) KELLEY DRYE & WARREN LLP 3050 K Street, NW, Suite 400 Washington, DC 20007 Telephone: (202) 342-8400 AND KEAN, MILLER, HAWTHORNE, D'ARMOND, McCOWAN & JARMAN, L.L.P. Glenn M. Farnet (#20185) Gina D. Banks (#27440) One American Place, 18th Floor Post Office Box 3513 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825 Telephone: (225) 387-0999 Attorneys for Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc., and Jackson Hewitt Inc. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?