Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al

Filing 148

AFFIDAVIT of Monte M.F. Cooper in Support re 146 MOTION to Compel Response to Interrogatory No. 1 filed by Dustin Moskovitz, Andrew McCollum, Christopher Hughes, Thefacebook LLC, Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5# 6 Exhibit 6# 7 Exhibit 7# 8 Exhibit 8# 9 Exhibit 9# 10 Exhibit 10# 11 Exhibit 11# 12 Exhibit 12# 13 Exhibit 13# 14 Exhibit 14# 15 Exhibit 15# 16 Exhibit 16# 17 Exhibit 17)(Cooper, Monte)

Download PDF
Connectu, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al Doc. 148 Att. 4 Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Document 148-5 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT 4 Dockets.Justia.com Case 1:07-cv-10593-DPW Hanhan, Melinda From: Sent: To: Cc: Cooper, Monte Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:39 PM Document 148-5 Filed 11/14/2007 Page 1 of 1 Page 2 of 2 Hornick, John; Hart, Pat; Kaufman, Daniel; Esquenet, Margaret; 'meredith.schoenfeld@finnegan.com' Dan Hampton; Robert Hawk; Annette Hurst; Gordon Katz; Sbauer; Joczek; Boutin, Anne; Chatterjee, I. Neel; Sutton, Theresa A.; Guy, Hopkins; Dalton, Amy; Trinh, Michael; Hanhan, Melinda; Mudurian, Karen; Hart, Stephanie; Sagmit, Magnolia "Mimi" Subject: RE: ConnectU v. Facebook, Case No. 07-10593 DPW John, et al.: It has now been almost a month since we sent our letters re plaintiff's discovery difficiencies from the earlier case; and it has been three weeks since we received the email response below, which promised a response pending discussion with the Winklevoss twins. As you know, we have made multiple requests regarding this matter, requesting such a response. We have not, however, received any type of written response to our multiple written inquiries, notwithstanding that the Pan Am games are long complete and the Winklevoss twins have been back in the United States for some time and even offered press conferences regarding the present litigation. Therefore, please provide a date and time in accordance with the Local Rules of the District of Massachusetts when you will meet and confer on the motion to compel contemplated by the letters previously forwarded to you. Please note, this request is made formally per Local Rule 37.1. Thank you for your attention to this issue. Monte From: Schoenfeld, Meredith [mailto:Meredith.Schoenfeld@finnegan.com] Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 11:03 AM To: Chatterjee, I. Neel; Sutton, Theresa A.; Guy, Hopkins; Cooper, Monte Cc: Dan Hampton; Robert Hawk; Annette Hurst; Gordon Katz; Kaufman, Daniel; Hornick, John; Sbauer; Joczek; Boutin, Anne; Esquenet, Margaret; Hart, Pat Subject: RE: ConnectU v. Facebook, Case No. 07-10593 DPW Dear Neel: We are currently considering the requests in your letter of July 2, 2007 (attached for your convenience). Your letter raises many issues we would like to discuss with our clients, but the Winklevoss brothers are out of the country, competing in the Pan America Games in Brazil. We do not expect to be able to have meaningful conversations with them until they return to the US late this month. Although we are willing to meet and confer before they return, our positions with respect to many of the production requests will be contingent on discussing them with our clients. Thus, we suggest waiting to meet and confer until after they return. Once we have discussed the issues raised by your letter with our clients, we will provide you with a letter detailing our position. If any issues remain which need further resolution, we can set up a discovery conference at that time. Please let us know if this is acceptable. Sincerely, Meredith This e-mail message is intended only for individual(s) to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, proprietary, or otherwise exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you believe you have received this message in error, please advise the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your mailbox. Thank you. 10/23/2007

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?