Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College et al
Filing
569
Opposition re 547 MOTION in Limine filed by Students for Fair Admissions, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16)(Mortara, Adam) (Attachment 6 replaced on 10/1/2018) (McDonagh, Christina). (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/2/2018: # 17 Unredacted Memorandum in Opposition (FILED UNDER SEAL), # 18 Exhibit 4 (Filed Under Seal)) (McDonagh, Christina).
Exhibit 15
1
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
BOSTON DIVISION
2
3
-------------------------------x
4
5
STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS,
INC.,
6
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
1:14-cv-14176
7
vs.
8
PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD
COLLEGE (HARVARD CORPORATION);
and THE HONORABLE AND REVEREND
THE BOARD OF OVERSEERS,
9
10
Defendants.
11
-------------------------------x
12
- HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY 13
14
DEPOSITION OF CATHERINE DREW
15
GILPIN FAUST, a witness called by the
16
Plaintiff, taken pursuant to the
17
applicable provisions of the Federal
18
Rules of Civil Procedure, before James A.
19
Scally, RMR, CRR, a Notary Public in and
20
for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, at
21
Harvard University, Massachusetts Hall,
22
Cambridge, Massachusetts, on Friday,
23
March 10, 2017, commencing at 8:52 a.m.
24
30
1
2
3
dispositive factor in admissions?
A.
It prevents any single characteristic from
being dispositive.
4
Q.
Do you know --
5
A.
They are all seen in a broad context.
6
Q.
Do you know how -- do you know that -- what
7
do you know about the origin of Harvard's holistic
8
admissions process?
9
A.
I know it's been around for a long time.
10
Q.
Are you familiar with the work of Jerome
11
Karabel?
12
A.
Yes.
13
Q.
Are you familiar with his book The Chosen?
14
A.
I am.
15
Q.
Are you -- are you generally aware that the
I have not read it.
I know of it.
16
holistic admissions process was used for a time in
17
the 20th century to discriminate against Jewish
18
applicants?
19
MS. ELLSWORTH:
Objection.
20
object to the entire line of
21
I
questioning.
22
MR. STRAWBRIDGE:
23
24
The objection's
noted.
Q.
Do you know whether that's true?
31
1
A.
I'm a historian.
I would not rely on the
2
interpretation of a single historian unchallenged.
3
have not done that historical work myself, and
4
therefore I would not presume to make judgment about
5
its accuracy.
6
Q.
I
Do you know whether Harvard has ever
7
acknowledged that its holistic admissions process was
8
used to discriminate against Jewish applicants in the
9
early 20th century?
10
MS. ELLSWORTH:
11
A.
I do not know.
12
Q.
Okay.
Objection.
Do you know whether prior Harvard
13
presidents have acknowledged that the use of a
14
holistic admissions process was inappropriate with
15
respect to Jewish applicants during the 20th century?
16
MS. ELLSWORTH:
Objection.
17
A.
I do not know.
18
Q.
Do you agree that it would be inappropriate
19
to use a holistic admissions process to discriminate
20
against Jewish applicants, for example?
21
22
MS. ELLSWORTH:
A.
Objection.
I believe that the holistic admissions
23
process is one that, by looking at the whole student
24
and the variety of dimensions that make up a class,
32
1
is the best way to give full consideration to
2
students of all backgrounds.
3
4
Q.
process could be abused?
5
6
Is it possible that a holistic admissions
MS. ELLSWORTH:
A.
Objection.
You're asking me to comment on abstractions
7
and hypothetical situations.
8
world of hypotheticals.
9
has happened, what is happening.
10
Q.
I don't live in the
I live in the world of what
Well, but you don't know what happened with
11
respect to the holistic admissions process of Jewish
12
applicants in the 20th century?
13
14
MS. ELLSWORTH:
A.
Objection.
I would argue that the entire context in the
15
1920s is so different from our own time, it would be
16
very -- you'd have to be very careful in making
17
direct comparisons between how admissions worked and
18
how Harvard worked and drawing a line of analogy
19
between those two times.
20
were to make such an argument, I would want to dig
21
deeply into the entire history and operation.
22
don't believe that has been done.
23
want to draw conclusions from it.
24
Q.
I'd want to dig in -- if I
I
And so I don't
To your knowledge, Harvard has never dug into
33
1
the history of how Jewish applicants were treated in
2
the 20th century?
3
A.
Not to my knowledge.
4
MS. ELLSWORTH:
5
Q.
I'm sorry.
6
A.
Not to my knowledge.
Objection.
Can you just repeat your answer?
I would say not to my
7
knowledge with the kind of depth and rigor that I
8
would want to see.
9
Q.
Do you think Harvard should look into that?
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
MS. ELLSWORTH:
A.
Objection.
I'd be perfectly happy to have Harvard look
into it.
Q.
Has anyone ever asked Harvard to look into
that in your time as president?
A.
I have -- they have not asked me, to my
recollection.
Q.
Do you think it's important for Harvard to
18
understand its history and how it treated certain
19
groups?
20
A.
21
22
23
24
I do think -MS. ELLSWORTH:
A.
Objection.
I do think it's important for Harvard to
understand its history.
Q.
Is that a commitment that should come from
310
1
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
SUFFOLK, SS.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
I, JAMES A. SCALLY, RMR, CRR, a
Certified Shorthand Reporter and Notary Public duly
commissioned and qualified in and for the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, do hereby certify that
there came before me on the 10th day of March, 2017,
at 8:52 a.m., the person hereinbefore named,
CATHERINE DREW GILPIN FAUST, who provided
satisfactory evidence of identification as prescribed
by Executive Order 455 (03-13) issued by the Governor
of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, was by me duly
sworn to testify to the truth and nothing but the
truth of her knowledge concerning the matters in
controversy in this cause; that she was thereupon
examined upon her oath, and her examination reduced
to typewriting under my direction; and that this is a
true record of the testimony given by the witness to
the best of my ability.
I further certify that I am neither
attorney or counsel for, nor related to or employed
by, any of the parties to the action in which this
deposition is taken, and further, that I am not a
relative or employee of any attorney or counsel
employed by the parties hereto or financially
interested in the action.
15
16
My Commission Expires:
April 8, 2022
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
_________________________
James A. Scally, RMR, CRR
CSR/Notary Public
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?