Ayyadurai v. Floor64, Inc. et al

Filing 1

COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-6439091 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Shiva Ayyadurai. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit, # 19 Exhibit, # 20 Exhibit, # 21 Exhibit)(Cornell, Timothy)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT O :h becl dinb Techdirt Main Wireless News Sutimiit a Story Innovation Case Studies Startups Net Neutrality Preferences Techdirt Deals! Register Sign In * RSS Follow Techdirt KQUiAdl ^ Techdirt - Supporting Creators, Wiith Patreon Founderjack Corite « Daily Deal: Makey Makey Invention Kit... iH Ulllb SOUNDCLOUD a a 13 » u m Turkish President Erdogan Mow Demands... » Insider Shop - Show Your Support! Guv Who Didn't Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing READ POSTS EARLY, JOIN THE INSIDER CHAT £ MORE Out He Didn't Invent Email : : inSIDER SHOP i»r from the s/iira joumDi t AuB Imgmircflftcr dept Oh boy Remember Shiva Ayyadurai? The guy who has gore to great Lengths to claim that he Defamation by Mike Mas nick Wed, May 11th 2016 10:44am "invented email," when the reality is that he appears to have (Likely independently) written an early implementation of email long after others had actually "invented email," In the past we've called out examples where gullible press have fallen for his easily debunked claims, but he keeps i x 1 popping back up, He somehow got an entire series into the Huffington Post, which was clearly Filed Under: defamation, email, lawsuit, nick ctenton, sam biddLe, shiva ayyadurai crafted as a PR exercise in trying to rewrite history The mainstream press repeated his bogus claims about inventing email after he married a TV star. And, most recently he decided to scream at the press for memorializing Ray Tbmlirson -- someone who actually did have a hard in Permalink. Short link. 53? "•* *2.49 WITH CARD creating email -- upon his death, Companies: gawker 1? A. If WeVe gore through in great detail as to why Ayyadurai is simply wrong in his claims. There's a lot Private Selection Salsa or Mission Burrito Tortillas m more to it, but the summary we've written in the past is this: j&tphs) ^owpire'i. BifBW First off, no one denies tlwt VIA. Shiva Ayyadurai -- an apparently very bright 14- Vaid until Dae. 13 year-old at the time -- wrote an email software program for the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) in 1978. By all accounts, it was a Report this ad \ Hide Techdirt ads Essential Reading perfectly decent email system that allowed the UMDNJ staff to send electronic messages. Further, no one doubts that, in 1981, Ayyadurai registered the copyright Hot Topics on his program, which was called EMAIL. The problems are that (1) email was invented long before 1978, (Z) the copyright is merely on the specific software code, 5.3 The FCC Suggests Some Wishy Washy, not the idea of email, and (3) while Ayyadurai mayliave independently recreated the Highly Unlikely Solutions To The basics of email (and even added a nice feature), none of his work was even remotely Poorly-Secured Internet Of Things related to what later became the standards of email. IVtat's most sickening about 5.2 1 If You're Worried About What President this is that as part of this new PR campaign, Ayyadurai is ridiculously arguing that Trump Can Do To The Press, Blame the reason no one believes him isn't because he's simply wrong, but because they Resident Obama can't stand to believe that "a dark-skinned immigrant kid, 14 years old," invented email, and that it was done in "one of the poorest cities in the US" rather than at a famous university 5.2 Judge Tosses Charges Against Backpage Execs, Tells Kamala Harris To Take It Up With Congress Again, that might make for a nice story line if there were some factual basis behind it, but there isn't. The history of email is well-documented from multiple sources New To Techdirt? and it began way, way before 1978. And while early versions were somewhat crude, Explore some core concepts: by 1978 they had basically everything that Ayyadurai claims to have invented (it is Infinity Is Your Friend In Economics entirely believable that Ayyadurai , as a bright kid, independently came up with the same ideas, but he was tardy the first). There was a messaging system called Advertising Is Content; Content Is MAILBOX at MIT in 1965. Vbu can read all the details of it here, including source Advertising code. Ray Tomlinson is frequently credited with inventing the modern concept of email for the internet by establishing the e symbol (in 1972) as a way of Step One To Embracing A Lack Of Scarcity: Recognize What Market You're Really In determining both the user and which computer to send the email to. By 1975, there read all » were things like email folders (invented by Larry Roberts) and some other basic email apps. As is noted, by 1 976 -- two years before Ayyadurai wrote his app -- email m.m; was 75% of all ARPANET traffic. For what it's worth, some have disputed the idea that he even added any features not existing in previous discussions. Nevertheless, he's not the 'inventor" of email, no matter how many times he claims he is, We, of course, have not been alone in debunking his claims. Back in 2012, a few weeks after we first debunked them, Gawker's Sam Biddle did a long and thorough takedown of Ayyadurai's claims. Apparently that story really angers Ayyadurai, and I'm guessing that seeing Hulk Hogan win his crazy lawsuit against Gawker helped Ayyadurai to decide to sue Gawker as well, And, in keeping with my belief that this is all one giant PR stunt, the lawsuit filing was accompanied by a press release that repeats the same debunked claims, and selectively quotes Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email || Techdirt Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email Techdirt Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT Page 1 of 13 I Ul TTIIC1L IV J >'UI VI I J JVI I IC IIO'C uupuvcu LI IC lUCtl LI Mil. I ITC C * CI I CIUUCU LJ I ry I cn lU I Cj I IUL CAIJLIIIg III previous discussions. Nevertheless, he's not the "inventor" of email, no matter how many times he claims he is, We, of course, have not been alone in debunking his claims. Back in 2012, a few weeks after we w, first debunked them, Gawker's Sam Biddle did a long and thorough takedown of Ayyadurai's claims. Apparently that story really angers Ayyadurai, and I'm guessing that seeing Hulk Hogan win Qfi his crazy lawsuit against Gawker helped Ayyadurai to decide to sue Gawker as well. And, in keeping with my belief that this is all one giant PR stunt, the lawsuit filing was accompanied by a press release that repeats the same debunked claims, and selectively quotes 2 the very media he fooled as evidence that he really invented email, The actual lawsuit is a joke. SERVICE BUNDLE BUY NOW As in the Hogan case, Ayyadurai is suing not just Gawker, but also the company's founder Nick Denton, along with the author of the articles {in this case, Sam Biddle), VPN Unlimited & To Do The filing again Lays out Ayyadurai's highly misleading version of history insisting again that Checklist: Lifetime getting the copyright on a program called EMAIL is the equivalent of "inventing" email. He continues to conflate patent and copyright Law and misleadingly claim that because you couldn't Subscription Bundle get a patent on software at the time, a copyright is basically the same thing, This is wrong on both counts, >bu oouild patent some software at the time, and either way a copyright is nowhere Report this at) near the equivalent. He also relies on debunked reports in Time Magazine and CBS, And also Wired, though he leaves out that Wired was just quoting Noam Chomsky, who bizarrely has | Hide Techdrri ads Techdirt Insider Chat become one of Ayyadurai's biggest defenders, and that the Wired story includes other evidence "j that Ayyadurai is wrong, Ayyadurai claims that Gawker's articles were defamatory specifically stating: http:tfnn.theregi5terco.uk/201 6J12/08/winter_i5_c< " time for the touches and pitchforks. I think. Dark Helmet: Touches and pitchforks is my new favorite typo win As described herein , the February 2012 Article arises to the level of defamation per Jeffrey Nonken: hah se, in that it falsely states that "[Dr.] Ayyadurai is a fraud. " Wiell. mobile interface. That's my excuse. As described herein, the March 2012 Article falsely alleges that: wrong, of course... ASCAR and MRAA seen as Vidiot: WaPo article on copyright fight gets it the Office's only constituents. How about us a) Dr. Ayyaduiw engaged in "semantic tiicks, falsehoods, and a citizens instead? b) Dr. Ayyadurai is engaged in "revisionism " in his claim of invention of Iittps ://www.was hin gto n p o st. co rn.'n ews/a rtsandentertainrnent/wpJ2016J12/09Lcongressional- email. p a n e l-ca 1 1 s-fo r-i n d e p e n d e n t-co py ri g lit-oB ce misinformation campaign. " Mike Masnick: well, they do quote new head of As described herein, the 2014 Articie arises to the level of defamation per se, by the ALA too, and he's good ? stating that Dr. Ayyadurai is a "fraud," thus falsely accusing Dr. Ayyadurai of a crime and causing prejudice to his personal and professional reputation and business. Join the Insider Chat The 2014 Article a!st? falsely states: a) Dr. Ayyadurai is a "renowned liar" with respect to his statements that he invented emaii, Advertisement b) Dr. Ayyadurai is a "big fake, " and c) Dr. Ayyadurai is engaged in "cyber-lies. " These defamation claims seem extremely weak. First off, as the detailed records show, Ayyadlurai did not invent email, So truth is generally a good response to defamation claims. Second, even if he did create email (and he didnt), most of these statements would be protected as either statements of opinion or rhetorical hyperbole. Finally, Ayyadurai as a self-proclaimed public Plans starting at just persona would have to show actual malice for it to be defamatory Hilariously the lawsuit claims no actual malice is necessary which is nonsense, Ayyadurai is so focused on making himself a $15/mo. No contracts. famous person over his exaggerated claims to have invented email that for him to try to argue he's not a public figure is laughable. His lawyers also show no evidence that there is actual malice from Switch Today! Gawker but insist that if they could get to the discovery phase, they could find evidence supporting actual malice. There are then three other claims: one for "intentional interference with prospective economic Report this at) \ Hide techdirt ads advantage," one for "intentional infliction of emotional distress" [the "my feelz!" argument), and Recent Stories one for (and I'm not kidding) "negligent hiring and retention," Ayyadurai goes into detail about how people pointing out that he is exaggerating his claims has Monday made people less willing to work with him. But that's not the fault of accurate reporting. Its the 1 3:09 "fv/o Former Senators Call On Obama To Save The fault of him focusing so much on a false claim to have invented email. Full ClAlbiture Report1 From Being Bulled (2) 1 1 :52 The FCC Suggests Some Wfehy Washy Highly Unlikely Solutions "lb The Poorly- Secured Internet T/ijs is the situation here: Defendants' false statements in the articles at issue had the effect of so severely discrediting Dr. Ayyadurai-based on the false statement that he is a "fraud"— that Dr. Ayyadurai's career was severely damaged. As a direct result of Defendants' publication of the false and defamatory statements about Dr. Ayyadurai , on information and belief, Dr. Ayyadurai has lost teaching positions at MIT, lost several paid speaking engagements at the time and in the future , lost an Off Things (13) 10:40 Iran The Latest Country "lb Use "Fake News As An Excuse For Widespread Censorship (10) 10:38 Daily Deal: DashCam Hi-Res Car Video Camera And SGB WkroSD Card (1 } 09:39 Georgia Secreta \y Of State Accuses DH5 Of Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email || Techdirt Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email Techdirt Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT Page 2 of 13 made people less willing to work with him. But chat's not the fault of accurate reporting. It's the 1 3:09 Two Former Senators Call On Obama To Save The Full ClA'Tbiture Report' From Beire Bulled (2) fault of him focusing so much on a false claim to have invented email. 1 1 :EI The FCC Suggests Borne Ytfchy Washy Highly Unlikely Solutions To The Poorly-Secured Internet This is the situation here: Defendants' false statements in the articles at issue had the effect of so severely discrediting Dr. Ayyadurai—based on the false statement Of Things 113) 10:40 Iran The Latest CountiyTb Use Fake Hews As An that he is a "fraud"— that Dr. Ayyadurai's career was severely damaged, As a direct result of Defendants' publication of the false and defamatoiy statements about Dr. Excuse For Widespread Censorship 110) 10:38 Ayyaaurai, on information and belief, Dr. Ayyadurai has lost teaching positions at MIT, lost several paid speaking engagements at the time and in the future, lost an 8GB MicraSD Card (1 ) 09:39 Georgia Secretary Of State Accuses OHS Of accolade and display dedicated to his invention at the Smithsonian Institute, lost contracts and renewais, lost opportunities for investment in his emeiging companies, suffered substantial personal and professional reputational haim, and suffered substantial barm to his career, business and income. Daily Deal: DashCam Hi-Res Car Video Camera And Breaching Bis Office's Firewall (14) 08:31 If hbuTe Wor ried About What Resident T ump Can Do To The Press, Blame Resident Obama (40) 08:29 Judge Tosses Char ges Against Backpage Execs, I'm sure that's distressing, but it's not the fault of Gawker for pointing out that Ayyadurai was Tells Kamala Harris To Take It Up With Congress 114) exaggerating what he did. It's what happens when you exaggerate like that and make grandiose 03:25 More Rosecutors Refuse To Accept Guilty Pleas claims that are not accurate, Based On Faulty 52 Field Drug Tests 111) The "negligent hiring" claims seems to just be an attempt to attack and mock Sam Biddle. I'm not a Sam Biddle fan by any stretch of the imagination, I think he has a history of taking things completely out of context and creating sensational posts that are misleading, at best, But that's Sunday 12:00 Funniest/ Most Insightful Comments Of The Vteek At Techdiit (5) not defamation, It's just bad reporting. And Ayyadurai's claims about "negligent hiring" basically accuse Biddle of being a drug addict and, potentially, mentally unstable. That claim is not going to Saturday last very Long and seems to serve no purpose other than to attack Biddle's reputation. 12:00 This Week In Techdirt History: SQFft, China, Dajazl & The Hypocrisy Of Copyright <2) The filing also spends a ton of completely wasted space on other lawsuits against Gawker, as if trying to prove that the company has a history of bad actions, But the litany of bad actions Listed are extremely exaggerated. Yes, Gawker has been sued for defamation, but Gawker has not lost More © Advertisement those cases and they are extremely unlikely to lose them, I mean, you're reaching really really low [> if you're citing Chuck Johnson's laughable defamation lawsuit against Gawker that has already been tossed out of a Missouri court for being ridiculous. And yes, Johnson also filed an identical case in California, but it's going nowhere [it was so identical that it focused on the harms in Missouri, despite being filed in California), But Ayyadurai's lawyers pretend that it's evidence of Gawker's defamatory history: Gawker has been sued multiple times for defamation, including currently in an Plans starting at just action in New Ybrk State Court, by the Doily Mail newspaper, and in an action in $15/mo. No contracts. California by an individual named Charles Johnson, for writing and publishing false and unsubstantiated rumots that Mr. Johnson had been involved in misconduct and criminal activity Switch Today! The lav/suit also cites a variety of other lav/suits involving Gawker that have nothing to do with defamation at all, including (obviously) the Hulk Hogan case that will almost certainly be Report this ad \ Hide Techdirt ads overturned on appeal, and also a copyright lawsuit from Dr. Phil and a few other examples of people being unhappy with Gawker's coverage. This case should go nowhere fast, and Ayyadurai may be opening himself up to a world of hurt in exposing himself to discovery, should the case even reach that stage. Unfortunately for Gawker, Massachusetts - where Ayyadurai filed this lawsuit -- has an anti-SLAPP statute that is much more limited and unfortunately may not be that helpful to Gawker, Yet another reason why we need a federal anti-SLAPP law as soon as possible. DOCUMENT PAGES Zoom TEXT Case 1: 16-cv- 10853 JC6 Document 1 , , , (Q. Search Filed 05/10/16 Page lot 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT (IF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON. MASSACHUSETTS SHIVA AYYADURAI. an individual. Plaintiff, ) CASE NO. i > COMPLAINT v. GAWKER MEDIA, LLC, a Delaware ) > limited liability company; SAM BIDDLE. an } individual. JOHN COOK, an indiv idml. ) NICHOLAS GUIDO ANTHONY DENTON. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ) an individual, and DOES 1-3J. > ) Defendants., Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email || Techdirt Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email Techdirt Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT 3 of 13 SHIVA At YAULIKAI. an individual. L AS E -VU: > Plaintiff, ) > GAWKER MEDIA. LLC, a Delaware ) ) ) COMPLAINT ) v. limited liability company: 5AM B1DDLE. an DEMAND FOR J DRY TRIAL .1 individual. JOHN COOK, an indit idiul. ) NICHOLAS GUIDO ANTHONY DENTON. ) on individual, and DOES l-20f } ) ) Defendant)-'. > Plaintiff Dr. Shiva Ayyadimii. by and through his undersigned atlorncy^, sue* Defendants Gawker Media, LLC. Sam Binldlc. John Cook. NKtwhs Guide* Anthony Denton, unl DOES 1-20 (collectively. "Defendants".!, and respectfully makes die following allegations. SI.MHARHWTia'.t-Affi i. Dr Ayyadurai is a wirU-rmwnfd wicrtiM. inventor, lecturer, ptiilauithrnpisi and entrepreneur. In 1978, Dr. Ayyadunu iavetrcd email: ihe electronic mail, system as we know it * j* <t n -* Rage 1 or 23 ? S @ E9 K3 ItH 03 44 Comments | Leave a Comment GET t+ HEAR SUBSCRIPTION TO THE TECHDIRT CRYSTAL BALL T jEprivate internet access » GET EARLY ACCESS TO TECHDIRT POSTS & PROTECT YOUR ONLINE PRIVACY WITH TOP-RATED VPN SERVICE Hide Tech dirt ads If you liked this: post, you may also be interested in... • Media Organizations (Correctly) Worry That Rolling Stone Verdict Will Make Saying Sorry Actionable • Fake News About Fake News Leads To (Fake?) Defamation Threat • Paul Levy Discovers Head Of Reputation Management Company Signed Off On Forged/Fraudulent Court Docs • Actual Creators Of Email Not At ALL Happy The Fake Creator Of Email Got Paid For I- is Bogus Claim • Here's The Truth: Shiva Ayyadurai Didn't Invent Email Reader Comments View by: Time | Thread J. DB (profile), f 1 May 2016 i© 10:58am Subscribe: RSS O1 *1131*1 a » m To be clear, he wrote a program that he named "EMAIL*, despite it not having the essential elements of a real email system. It was more like a cubbyhole system at a rural general store than a mail system. It worked only within a single machine with a fixed set of known users. It never had to deal with the challenges of queuing, batch delivery, handling different address formats, etc. that were the challenging problems. [ reply to this I link to this I view in chronology ] 1. Mason Wheele-r (profile), )? May 2016 g D.-Ofarr r~+ 1 si + 1 a » m In Hindu mythology; isn't Shiva the name of The Destroyer? Just saying... [ reply to this I link to thH I view in chronology ] Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email || Techdirt Document title: Guy Who Didn&#39;t Invent Email Sues Gawker For Pointing Out He Didn&#39;t Invent Email Techdirt Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture URL: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160511/10135934407/guy-who-didnt-invent-email-sues-gawker-pointing-out-he-didnt-invent-email.shtml Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT Capture timestamp (UTC): Mon, 12 Dec 2016 22:06:30 GMT 4 of Page 13

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?