Dowdy et al v. Caruso, et al

Filing 127

MEMORANDUM and ORDER Overruling Objections to Settlement 103 117 120 . Signed by District Judge Avern Cohn. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (CBet)

Download PDF
Dowdy, et al. v. Caruso, et al, 06-11765 Objections to Settlement EXHIBIT A Docket Number Date Filed Title of paper Filed by Summary Doc. 90 10/16/13 Objections to Class Action Settlement in Case Number 2:06-cv11765 Ali Sareini Says that he has settlement in prior federal case that allows him to meet his halal meat requirement with Kosher diet. Objects to the non-meat diet. Also objects to the procedures to request participation in Eid feats. Doc. 91 10/17/13 handwritten letter addressed to the Court Sharon Smith Says that the vegan diet does not meet her nutritional health needs. Although she does not have health problem, she says too much soy poses a health risk in women. Doc. 93 10/24/13 Motion for Objections Gene Favors Says he has been asking for a halal diet for years. Objects to the non-meat diet. Doc. 94 10/10/13 Motion to Object the Judgment Tom Traini Objects to the non-meat diet. 1 Docs. 96100 10/11/13 Notice of Compulsory Countersuit to Settlement of the Case due to Malicious Retaliation and Fraud by the Defendants Curwood-Lewis Price Objects to the non-meat diet and not being able to grieve the new menu policy. Notice and Demand for with Withdrawal of Attorney General Representation of Defendant Notice of Payment and Surety Notice of Lien and Levy Notice of Invocation of Pro Se Litigant Rights Doc. 103 10/31/13 Plaintiff’s Motion for Mandamus Enforce Judgment of the Court Tabu Wright Says that the MDOC did not allow him to attend prayer services in July of this year. Doc. 105 10/31/13 Objection to Class Action Proposed Settlement on Behalf of Class Members Muslims of the Muskegon Correctional Facility Na’im A. AbdulMateen, on behalf of himself and others at Muskegon Correctional Facility Says the vegan diet is not healthy, citing a study on alleged dangers of soy. Also says Islamic law does not allow for vegetarians. 2 Doc. 106107 10/31/13 Affirmation of Class Membership and Bilal Chaaban Objections to Proposed Settlement Doc. 107 Says he has been in the past denied access to prayer services and forced to eat non halal food. Concerned about cross contamination. Also objects to the vegan diet on grounds it is not healthy, especially for the elderly. Wants for Muslims to have the Kosher diet (which contained meat) Doc. 109 10/31/13 no title Umar Ahmad Siddij Says he and others at Baraga Correctional Facility are not being allowed to attend prayer services and were not allowed to have the Eid feasts in July Asks that the MDOC follow the settlement Doc. 110 10/31/13 Muslim Prisoner Class Member Jerry Vandiver’s Written Objections Jerry Vandiver 3 Says he was denied right to attend prayer services since 2003 and continues to be denied the ability to attend prayer services. Doc. 111 10/31/13 Objection to Settlement Daw’ud Ayatollah Clark-X Says he has been asking for halal diet for years. Objects to the non-meat diet. Says Islam allows meat and dairy. Also asks for other things, including the right to follow Muslim dress codes. Doc. 112 11/1/13 Motion for Objection(s) Gene Favors Appears to be a follow up to his prior objections (Doc. 93). Seems to suggest that the MDOC will not abide by the settlement and says there has been cross contamination in the food lines Doc. 117 11/7/13 Motion for Objection to Defendant’s Proposed Settlement Agreement Anam-Ullah Objects to the non-meat diet. Doc. 118 11/7/13 Class Action Settlement Objection Robert J. Jackson Objects to the non-meat diet. Also says that the vegan diet does not meet nutritional needs. Doc. 119 11/7/13 Objection Brian White Says Muslims should be compensated with money damages for being denied their right to practice their religion Doc. 120 11/7/13 Motion for Objection to Defendant’s Proposed Settlement Agreement Jimmie Simpson Objects to the non-meat diet. 4 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?