American Freedom Defense Initiative et al v. Suburban Mobility Authority For Regional Transportation (SMART) et al

Filing 58

MOTION for Summary Judgment by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1--Declaration of Robert Spencer, # 3 Exhibit 2--Declaration of Pamela Geller, # 4 Exhibit 3--Declaration of Robert J. Muise, # 5 Exhibit 4--SMART deposition excerpts, # 6 Exhibit 5--SMART deposition exhibits, # 7 Exhibit 6--Beth Gibbons deposition excerpts, # 8 Exhibit 7--Pamela Geller deposition excerpts, # 9 Exhibit 8--Pamela Geller deposition exhibits, # 10 Exhibit 9--Elizabeth Dryden deposition excerpts) (Muise, Robert)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT 7 Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 1 1 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 3 SOUTHERN DIVISION 4 5 AMERICAN FREEDOM DEFENSE 6 INITIATIVE, PAMELA GELLER, and 7 ROBERT SPENCER, 8 9 Plaintiffs, -vs- CASE NO. 2:10-cv-12134 10 HON. DENISE PAGE HOOD 11 SUBURBAN MOBILITY AUTHORITY 12 FOR REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION 13 ("SMART"); GARY L. HENDRICKSON, 14 Individually and in his official capacity as 15 Chief Executive of SMART; JOHN HERTEL, 16 Individually and in his official capacity as 17 General Manager of SMART; and BETH 18 GIBBONS, Individually and in her official 19 capacity as Marketing Program Manager 20 of SMART, 21 Defendants. 22 _______________________________________ / 23 PAGES 1 TO 197 24 25 Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 12 1 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Do you have a middle name? 2 EXHIBITS (CONTINUED): Exhibit Page DEPOSITION EXHIBIT UU Blog post (Exhibits attached to transcript) THE WITNESS: No. 3 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Let the record reflect that 4 this is the deposition of Pamela Geller taken pursuant 5 to notice to be used for all purposes under the 6 Federal Rules of Evidence, the Federal Rules of Civil 7 186 Procedure, and the common law. 8 Can we go off the record, please? 9 (An off-the-record discussion was held) 10 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Let's go on the record 11 12 then. 13 EXAMINATION BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 14 Q. Ms. Geller, are you currently employed? 15 A. Yes. 16 Q. Where are you employed? 17 A. I am president of the American Freedom Defense 18 19 20 Initiative. Q. American Freedom Defense Initiative is a defendant -or a plaintiff in this case; is that correct? 21 A. Yes. I think so. 22 Q. Are you qualified here today to speak on behalf of 23 American Freedom Defense Initiative as well? 24 MR. MUISE: Objection. This deposition was 25 not noticed as a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition. So I will Page 11 Page 13 1 Troy, Michigan 1 state for the record the answer is her -- her 2 May 9, 2013 2 deposition that is going to be taken pursuant to the 3 About 9:58 a.m. 3 notice is the deposition of Pamela Geller. You didn't 4 notice this as a 30(b)(6) deposition. 4 THE REPORTER: My name is Anne Chilton, court MR. HILDEBRANDT: Well, I'm not required to, 5 reporter with Hanson/Renaissance Court Reporting 5 6 located at 400 Renaissance Center, Suite 2160 in 6 under the court rules, to notice it as a 30(b)(6) 7 Detroit, Michigan. 7 deposition, as you well know. 8 Today is Thursday, May 9th, 2013. This is 8 MR. MUISE: No. That's exactly not true. 9 the time and place for the deposition of Pamela Geller 9 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Well -- 10 being taken at the offices of Vandeveer Garzia located 10 MR. MUISE: You have to designate specific 11 at 1450 West Long Lake Road, Suite 100, Troy, 11 categories that you are going to -- that you want to 12 Michigan, 48098. 12 -- that you want to ask of a corporate entity and then 13 we designate who the witness is pursuant to what 13 PAMELA GELLER, 14 having first been duly sworn, was examined 14 your...to what questions you designated, the subject 15 and testified on her oath as follows: 15 matter you designate. You've done neither of those. MR. HILDEBRANDT: Rule 30 (b)(6) is a method 16 THE WITNESS: I do. 16 17 THE REPORTER: And present today is Attorney 17 in which you can identify a witness, just like a 18 Robert Muise on behalf of the plaintiffs from Ann 18 question at a deposition is a method in which you can 19 Arbor, Michigan, Attorney Christian Hildebrandt with 19 identify an appropriate witness of an organization. 20 Vandeveer Garzia, Attorney Avery Gordon with SMART, 20 Rule 30(b)(6) specifically says that it does not 21 Plaintiff Robert Spencer, and Mr. Hildebrandt's law 21 preclude a deposition by any other procedure allowed 22 clerk, Chelsea Pasquali. 22 by the rules. And so if Ms. Geller here is the person 23 who would normally be produced as the 30(b)(6) 24 witness, she can certainly identify herself as that 25 and this can proceed as a witness from both based upon 23 24 25 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Can you state your full name for me, please? THE WITNESS: Pamela Geller. 4 (Pages 10 to 13) Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 14 1 2 the rule you cite. Page 16 1 MR. MUISE: You have to identify the subject 2 3 matter upon which you intend to inquire of the 3 4 corporation. You have not done that. 4 of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom from religion, and individual rights. Q. Okay. Does it have a particular focus within that broad category? A. I just -- 5 MR. HILDEBRANDT: If I choose to name the 5 6 corporation directly, then I have to identify that and 6 7 you get the opportunity to identify the witness, I 7 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 8 agree, that is what 30(b)(6) is for, however, in this 8 Q. Does it? 9 deposition I get to ask her whether she would also be 9 A. I just answered the question. 10 the 30(b)(6) witness and ask her questions concerning 10 11 the corporation as well. 11 12 MR. MUISE: It has not been properly noticed. MR. MUISE: Objection, vague. Q. I didn't hear because Mr. Muise was speaking at the same time. What did you say? 12 A. I just answered the question. Q. Okay. My question was does it have a particular focus 13 She's going to be answering pursuant to her personal 13 14 knowledge as a plaintiff in this case, Pamela Geller. 14 15 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Okay. So she's not 15 16 allowed, you're saying, to answer questions for AFDI. 16 within that broad description you gave. MR. MUISE: Objection, asked and answered, vague. 17 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 18 be answering questions in her personal capacity as a 18 Q. What was the answer? 19 plaintiff, Pamela Geller. 19 A. It's a human rights organization dedicated to freedom 20 of speech, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, 17 20 MR. MUISE: At this deposition she's going to MR. HILDEBRANDT: Can you answer my question 21 about whether you're going to allow her to answer 21 freedom from religion, and individual rights. 22 questions about AFDI with a yes or no? 22 Q. Okay. Do you focus on any particular religion 23 MR. MUISE: She -- whatever personal 23 primarily? 24 knowledge she has about AFDI, she can answer those 24 A. Maybe. 25 questions, but she's not testifying here on behalf of 25 Q. What would that religion be? Page 15 Page 17 1 A. Islam. 2 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Fair enough. 2 Q. How long have you been associated with American 3 MR. MUISE: She was not noticed as such. 3 4 MR. HILDEBRANDT: Again, I don't believe she 4 A. Since 2009. Q. I understand that you've had a number of blogs prior 1 AFDI. 5 needed to be, but we'll proceed as you wish, and if we 5 6 need to bring her back, we'll bring her back. 6 Freedom Defense Initiative? to that time, is that correct, since prior to that time? 7 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 7 8 Q. Ms. Geller, you said you were the president of 8 A. What's -- what do you mean about blog? 9 Q. Do you know what a blog is? 9 American Freedom Defense Initiative? 10 A. Yes. Executive director. 10 A. I know what a blog is. 11 Q. Is there a difference between president and executive 11 Q. Okay. 12 A. Do you mean blogs? Do you mean posts? Q. I mean blogs, actual blogs, not specific posts. 12 director or are you both? 13 A. It's a distinction without difference. 13 14 Q. Okay. It's one -- it's one thing with two names 14 15 essentially is what you're saying; correct? 15 You've been operating, for instance, the atlasshrugs.com blog for how long? 16 A. (Witness nodded.) 16 A. February 2005. 17 Q. Is there a title for president and a separate title 17 Q. Do you have any other blogs that you regularly post on 18 for executive director? 18 19 A. I don't know. 19 20 Q. Okay. Fair enough. 20 21 All right. What is American Freedom Defense or manage? A. I have other blogs. I don't post regularly, but American Freedom Defense Initiative has a blog. 21 Q. What is the internet address for that? 22 A. AFDI.US. 23 A. It's a 501 -- it's a non-profit. 23 Q. And how long has that been operating? 24 Q. And what is its purpose? 24 A. I don't recall. 25 A. It is a human rights organization dedicated to freedom 25 Q. Okay. Was it pretty much since the inception of AFDI? 22 Initiative? 5 (Pages 14 to 17) Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 166 Page 168 religious ad. It's not a political ad. 1 Q. Is this a religious ad? 1 2 A. Yes. 2 3 Q. There's nothing political in this ad? 3 because it was a political ad and we're allowed to, 4 A. No. It was The New York Times that denied me the ad. 4 would you agree that this was political enough to 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 They're a private company. 5 Q. If you presented this to SMART and SMART rejected it reject? refused it? A. Yes. I sought to run it when they were running the 6 A. I wouldn't submit this ad to SMART. I would submit -- 7 Q. You sought to put this in The New York Times and they Q. Why? 8 A. Because I would -- 9 Q. It's got a graphic of a burning Quran. And who is that individual to the left? A. That is -- it's not The Blind Sheik. I forget his name. He's a notorious Jihadi. Because they don't take political ads. I 10 would submit a purely religious message, that's it. 11 Catholic ad, the same exact ad. Q. Okay. A purely religious message is all you would 12 13 submit to SMART. A. Yes. 14 And that's me. Because they had a cartoon 14 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT RR 15 and so we just flipped the people. It was -- it was 15 WAS MARKED BY THE REPORTER 16 really -- it was snarky. It was snark. 16 FOR IDENTIFICATION 17 Q. What do you mean by snark? 17 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 18 A. I mean I took their ad and I took out -- they had the 18 Q. Okay. Let's go to the next one, which is going to be 19 Pope or they had some Catholic bishop and I flipped it 19 RR. Shariah: Got Fatwa? Get help! Call a number. 20 with these people to make a point because I didn't 20 21 think they would run the ad. 21 A. Yeah. 22 Q. Is this a political message? 23 A. This is a religious message. It is the exact copy of 22 23 Q. But this is a fully religious message and not a political message? 24 A. Yeah. 24 25 Q. Obama has compromised, but Islam -- 25 www.defendingreligiousfreedom.us. a pro-Sharia ad that ran in Kansas. Q. Okay. Page 167 Page 169 1 A. Oh. 1 2 Q. -- never budges? 2 3 A. Yeah. 3 4 Q. Eliminating and destroying Western civilization from 4 5 within and sabotaging its miserable house? 5 6 A. That's a direct quote. 6 7 Q. I understand, but is it a political quote or is it a 7 8 9 10 11 religious quote? A. It's a religious -- well, it's a quote from Muslim Brotherhood groups. Q. Ask your imam: Does he support Hamas? Hizb'Allah? 8 A. And I sought to run this and it did run right opposite it. Q. Okay. This is not political, is that what you're saying? A. Well, it's definitely -- it has a political aspect to it, but it's a religious ad. It's relig- -- it's both. Yeah. It's both. Q. Okay. All right. Fair enough. DEPOSITION EXHIBIT SS 9 WAS MARKED BY THE REPORTER 10 FOR IDENTIFICATION 11 12 The destruction of Israel? Does he condemn the 12 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 13 killing of Christians in Egypt, Nigeria, Indonesia, 13 Q. Let's go to SS, and we're talking about the ad that's 14 etc.? 14 15 A. Yeah. 15 Fatwa on your head? Is your family or 16 Q. Does he vocally denounce Islamic honor killings, FGM, 16 community threatening you? Got questions? Get 17 answers! Leaving Islam? RefugeFromIslam.com. 17 18 forced marriages, child marriage, polygamy. FGM being female genital mutilation; correct? at issue in our particular case. Is this a political message? 18 19 A. Correct. 19 A. No. 20 Q. Those are not political issues? 20 Q. Is there any political aspect of this message? 21 A. The reference to Obama, clearly that's -- that -- 21 A. No. Q. Can you look at RR and tell me what the political 22 Obama is a political figure, but the ad is not about 22 23 Obama. 23 24 Q. Okay. 24 25 A. The ad is about Islam, and so that's why it's a 25 aspect of that message was that is not also present in SS? A. Repeat. 43 (Pages 166 to 169) Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 174 1 2 Q. Okay. Let me ask you this. Was she even honor killed? Page 176 1 2 Muslims, support networks, safe houses, Ali Sena, Nonie Darwish. 3 A. Absolutely. 3 4 Q. According to her family? 4 5 A. The family that had a hand in honor killing her? 5 A. Not to my knowledge, but, again, that's not on this -- 6 Q. Well, now, wait a second. What evidence do you have Q. Are there any political postings on RefugeFromIslam.com? 6 Q. When did you last look at it? 7 that there's an honor killing when the prosecutor of 7 A. I don't recall. 8 Macomb County has determined there's not, when the 8 Q. Okay. 9 sheriff's department in Macomb County has determined 9 A. But, again, the ad is what it is, it speaks for 10 there's not, and the family has asked you to stop 10 itself, and honestly, all of this, different messages, 11 using Jessica Mokdad's name in your conferences that 11 different objectives. You may try and tie it, but 12 you set up in Dearborn in her honor? 12 you, in your heart, look at this ad and it is what it 13 A. Yes. 13 is. Fatwa on your head? A religious edict. A 14 Q. What is it that you have that says she was honor 14 religious edict. We know about what these religious 15 killed? 15 -- 16 A. Apart from the fact that that has nothing to do with 16 Q. The application of Sharia law; correct? 17 this ad and this -- this has nothing to do with the 17 A. Not by the government. 18 ad. 18 Q. Not by the government. 19 A. Not by the government. Q. Is it an issue that has been politicized? 19 Q. Now, wait a second. You said the ad ran to save the 20 honor killed and you knew the honor killed was Jessica 20 21 Mokdad who wasn't killed in Dearborn, but that's the 21 22 one you gave me as an example and so what I'm trying 22 A. Yeah. What does that mean? to do is explore really that. MR. MUISE: Objection, vague. 23 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 24 A. Yeah. 24 Q. Well, you've answered the question before. You must 25 Q. What do you have that says she was honor killed? 25 23 have known what it -- Page 175 A. Well, her best friends who said that she feared, that Page 177 1 A. No. I've questioned your -- that word, politicized. 2 she feared being honor murdered, and one friend who 2 Q. And I said has the issue of Sharia law been used to 3 would not -- who stopped being friends with her 3 advance a campaign or to gain a political advantage or 4 because he feared for his own life. But, again, this 4 to -- in a speech in any political fashion that's 5 has nothing to do with that and you really can't go to 5 politicizing. You acknowledged that before and 6 the family when a girl has been honor murdered because 6 7 it is a family affair. But, again, that's what this 7 8 ad was. It was for girls like Rifqa Bary, a girl -- a 8 9 Muslim girl who ran away from home. 9 1 10 Q. R-i-f-q-a B-a-r-r-y[sic]. Go ahead. I'm sorry. I just need to make 11 12 sure she gets the names. 10 11 12 answered the question before. A. No. I said -- you can politicize a cupcake is what I said. Q. Yes, you did, but is Sharia law politicized under that definition? A. This is a -- this is -- this is a call to girls who need help. 13 A. Yeah. Muslim girls who want to lead a more Western 13 14 life, Western girls like Rifqa Bary who want to lead a 14 15 more Western life, but their family is devout and 15 Q. I might. 16 their lives are in danger. That was the point of this 16 A. Really? 17 ad. 17 Q. I don't know. Try to run the ad. But, nevertheless, How -- I don't see anything political in this 18 19 ad. 18 If this was battered wives, would you be sitting here grilling me for six hours about this? Sharia law is a politicized issue, is it not? MR. MUISE: Objection, vague. 19 20 Q. Is this ad -- 20 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 21 A. And whatever other ads I've done is completely 21 Q. This is a religious freedom issue, is that what you 22 irrelevant. This is saying is your family or your 22 23 community threatening you, got questions, get answers, 23 24 and Refuge From Islam, even though -- you don't have 24 25 to go off the four corners, as you put it, is former 25 say? A. This is a help for girls, young Muslim girls' issues, and they need it. Q. Is there any political component to 45 (Pages 174 to 177) Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 178 1 2 3 RefugeFromIslam.com? Page 180 1 A. No. 2 MR. MUISE: Objection, asked and answered. 3 A. I guess you could say it's freedom from their religious parents ad. Q. Is it a religious freedom ad as you previously 4 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 4 testified? 5 Q. Does it link to any political websites of yours? 5 A. No, it is not. 6 A. I have no idea. 6 Q. Okay. So -- so -- 7 Q. Don't all your websites cross link to each other? 7 A. It is very narrow in what it says, and honestly, SMART 8 A. What do you mean? Links on the side? 8 9 Q. Yeah. 9 did not refuse my ad for political reasons. They refused my ad because they said it was controversial. 10 A. I -- this is not -- it's not relevant to this ad. 10 Q. No. 11 Q. Yes, it is because it's referenced in this ad. 11 A. Yes. 12 A. It's not relevant to the ad, the message of the ad. 12 Q. Does this -A. She testified. Beth -- Beth -- Beth Gibbons was it? 13 Anyone who's in trouble would go and be able to get in 13 14 contact with help. That's what this ad is. It's ver- 14 I forget -- I may have it wrong. I think it's Beth 15 -- it's very specific. It's not ambiguous. Leaving 15 Gibbons testified it was because it was controversial. 16 Islam? Is there Fatwa on your head? Is your family 16 They saw a newspaper article in the Miami Herald and 17 threatening you? Do you need help? 17 they -- they thought it was controversial and that's 18 why they refused the ad. That's what happened. You 18 And the reason -- 19 Q. It doesn't say do you need help, does it? 19 wanted to morph -- you want to change it now. That's 20 A. Got questions, get answers, that to me -- okay. But 20 something else. I understand that, but that's what 21 22 clearly it's offering help. 21 Q. Is it a religious message or a religious freedom happened. 22 Q. Is this ad disparaging to Muslims? 23 A. No. Where are Muslims being disparaged in this ad? 24 A. It is a religious message. 24 Q. Is this ad insulting a subset of Muslims? 25 Q. Okay. 25 A. No. This ad is trying to save lives, period. 23 message or both? Page 179 1 2 A. It's for girls that are being -- that are in trouble because of their religion. 3 Q. The last time you testified on this in court -- 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. -- you said this was a religious freedom message. 6 What did you mean by religious freedom at that time? 7 A. A girl that wants to escape a dangerous household. 8 Q. Is religious freedom a political issue? 9 A. This is not a political ad. 10 Q. Can you acknowledge that this can be more than one 11 category of ad? 12 A. No, and even -- 13 Q. So this is not -- 14 15 So what you're saying is that this is a religious ad. 16 A. This is a religious ad. 17 Q. This is not a political ad. 18 A. This is not a political ad. 19 Q. This is not a religious freedom ad. 20 A. This is an ad for help. 21 Q. Okay. Is this a religious freedom ad? 22 A. This is an ad to help girls. 23 Q. I get that. Is this a religious freedom ad? 24 A. It's a religious ad. 25 Q. I understand. Is this a religious freedom ad? Page 181 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q. Is this ad likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule Muslims? A. No. This ad is designed to save lives, and save lives -Q. Whatever it's designed for, is it likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule Muslims? A. No. MR. MUISE: Objection, asked and answered. BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: Q. Is it likely -A. It's more likely to save a life. That's what it's more likely to do. Q. Is it likely to -I'm not asking what's more likely. Is it likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule Muslim fathers that are threatening their children? A. No. Q. Okay. Is it likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule communities that are threatening Muslim girls? A. No. Q. Is it likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule a religious law that issues fatwas for leaving Islam? A. No. Q. Okay. Fair enough. DEPOSITION EXHIBIT TT 46 (Pages 178 to 181) Pamela Geller 5/9/2013 Page 182 Page 184 1 WAS MARKED BY THE REPORTER 1 there in order to correct the rejection; right? You 2 FOR IDENTIFICATION 2 wouldn't have bothered if it was some other rejection; correct? 3 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 3 4 Q. TT. What is this ad? 4 A. I went to -- I went to -- I resubmitted it. 5 A. This is a religious ad much like the one that ran -- 5 Q. Okay. Without that. 6 the one you actually did run for the atheist group. 6 And what happened when you resubmitted it? 7 Q. Where did this ad run? 7 A. They accepted it. 8 A. It didn't run. 8 Q. Okay. So without the website 9 Q. Did this ad ever run anywhere? 9 10 A. No. 10 11 Q. What was this ad created for? 11 12 A. For SMART. 12 13 Q. Okay. Specifically to run on SMART buses? 13 14 A. Yes. 14 15 Q. Was there any other purpose in presenting this ad to TheTruthAboutMuhammad.com you would have been able to run this ad, Don't believe in Muhammad, You are not 15 16 that sounds, yes. Q. As much as -I mean you asked for it and they approved it. 16 SMART, perhaps as a litigation trap? A. I didn't understand the refusal. I still don't. Q. You asked to -- you re-presented it to run it and they 17 A. No. 17 18 Q. Okay. Fair enough. 18 So you wanted people to get the message don't 19 alone; correct? A. As ridiculous as that sounds, it's true. As silly as accepted it. Have you run it? 19 A. No. 20 Q. Why have you not run it? 21 A. Correct. 21 A. I just don't have the money right now, but I'll get to 22 Q. And you submitted that to SMART; correct? 22 23 A. Yes. 23 Q. Okay. You do plan on running it? 24 Q. Did SMART accept this ad? 24 A. At some point. 25 A. No. 25 Q. Okay. What is TheTruthAboutMuhammad.com? 20 believe in Muhammad, you're not alone; correct? it. Page 183 Page 185 A. It's a site with...or it's a page with many of 1 Q. What did SMART do? 1 2 A. They refused it. 2 3 Q. Why did they refuse it ostensibly? 3 4 A. I don't recall. You would know. I honestly don't 4 Q. Does it refer to Muhammad as a pedophile prophet? 5 A. I -- I don't know. I have to look at the site. I 5 recall the actual reason. I did go back -- Spencer's writings discussing the truth about Muhammad. don't know. 6 Q. Did they tell you it was disparaging to Muslims? 6 7 A. I don't recall. 7 Q. Does it insult the Islamic faiths in any way? 8 Q. Did they tell you that it would hold up to scorn or 8 A. I don't know and it's not on the ad that was accepted. 9 ridicule a group of Muslims or subset of Muslims? 9 So why are we having this conversation? 10 A. I do not recall. 10 Q. Is it political in nature, TheTruthAboutMuhammad.com? 11 Q. Did they tell you that it was political in nature? 11 A. It's a religious ad. 12 A. I don't recall. 12 Q. Is the website political in nature? 13 Q. Did they tell you that the website that it referred to 13 A. No. Not to my knowledge. If there's a link there 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 was political in nature? 14 or -- I can't -- I don't know. A. I don't recall why. 15 Q. Do you agree that even if it was a religious message, Q. Did you offer to run this ad without the website 16 a particular ad could likely hold somebody up to scorn 17 or ridicule? reference? A. I went back to them and offered to run the ad without the website. Q. So they obviously rejected it because of the website reference; correct? MR. MUISE: Objection, calls for speculation. 18 MR. MUISE: Objection, calls for speculation. 19 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 20 Q. Do you believe that's a possibility, that an ad could 21 22 do both? A. I can't answer that. You want me to answer what's in people's minds. I can't do it. 23 A. Yeah. I don't know. 23 24 BY MR. HILDEBRANDT: 24 Q. Do you acknowledge that you could have a religious 25 Q. Well, you went back to them without the website on 25 message that was holding somebody up to scorn or 47 (Pages 182 to 185)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?