Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al
Filing
204
NOTICE by Lee Enterprises Incorporated Notice of Lifting Stay (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (Smith, Jeffrey)
Anita Harper Poe
Jeffrey B. Smith
GARLINGTON, LOHN & ROBINSON, PLLP
350 Ryman Street. P. O. Box 7909
Missoula, MT 59807-7909
Telephone (a06) 523-2500
Telefax (406) 523-2595
ahpoe@garlington.com
j bsmith@garlington. com
Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc.
IN TI{E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA
MISSOULA DIVISION
MICHAEL E. SPREADBURY.
Cause No.
CV-l I -064-M-DWM
Plaintiff.
NOTICE OF LIFTING STAY
V.
BITTERROOT PUBLIC LIBRARY.
CITY OF HAMILTON, LEE
ENTERPRISES, INC., and BOONE
KARLBERG P.C.,
Defendants.
COMES NOW Co-Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc. ("Lee Enterprises"),
through its counsel, Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, PLLP, and hereby notifies the
Court that the Automatic Stay against Lee Enterprises is lifted.
On December 1 3,201l, this action was stayed as against Lee Enterprises
pursuant to U.S.C. $ 326(a)(1) (Dkt. 192). On January 30,2012, the confirmed
t114922
Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan became effective.
(,See
Exhibit
A: Not. . . . Effective
Date of Plan of Reorg. (Jan. 30,2012)) and, accordingly, the Stay is lifted.
DATED this 30th day of Janvdry,2012.
lsl Jeffrev B. Smith
Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certiff that on January 30,2012, a copy of the foregoing document
was served on the following persons by the following means:
2
I
CM/ECF
Hand Delivery
Mail
Overnight Delivery Service
Fax
E-Mail
1.
Michael E. Spreadbury
P.O. Box 416
Hamilton, MT 59840
Pro Se Plaintiff
2.
William L. Crowley
Natasha Prinzing Jones
Thomas J. Leonard
bcrowley @boonekarlberg. com
npj ones@boonekarlberg. com
tleonard@boonekarlberg. com
Attorneys for Defendants Bitterroot Public Library, City of Hamilton, and
Boone Karlberg P.C.
lsl
Jeffrev B. Smith
Attorneys for Defendant, Lee Enterprises, Inc.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?