Spreadbury v. Bitterroot Public Library et al

Filing 57

RESPONSE to Motion re 51 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment DEF LEE ENTERPRISES INC'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PL'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST LEE ENTERPRISES filed by Lee Enterprises Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit FOUNDATIONAL AFFIDAVIT OF JEFFREY B. SMITH, # 2 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Stacey Mueller, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K, # 13 Exhibit L, # 14 Exhibit M, # 15 Exhibit N, # 16 Exhibit O) (Smith, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
EXHIBITM Hamilton man pleads guilty to intimidating library employee Page I of I Hamilton man pleads guilty to intimidating library employee By SEPP JANNOTTA Ravalli Republic I Posted: Friday, Octob€r 15, 2010 E:45 pm HAMILTON - Michael Spreadbury, the former Hamilton mayoral candidate, pleaded guilty Friday to one count offelony intimidation stemming liom charges linked to his harassment last November ofa Bitterroot Public Library employee. According to a plea agreement entered in the Missoula courtroom ofDistrict Court Judge Douglas G. Harkin, Spreadbury was handed a deferred sentence ofone year, during which he must refiain fiom aontact "by any means, including through a third party" with Nansu Roddy, a public services librarian in Hamilton. The agreement requires the "removal ofany images of, photos of, or content refening to Nansu Roddy from any website controlled by or contributed to by the defendant." Spreadbuy has a pair ofwebsites he has regularly used to rail against Roddy, myriad govemment officials and the Ravalli Republic, all ofwhom he claims have been persecuting him and violating his constitutional fights. Provided he obeys the agreement's provisions, the deal allows Spreadbury to avoid jail time or punitive fines. A conviction on felony intimidation would have carried the possibility of 10 years behind bars and a fine ofup to $50,000. Spreadbury was originally charged with misdemeanor trespassing in June 2009, for returning to the library after he had been baned llom using the facility after a dispute in which he insisted the library keep as ref€renc€ mate al letters he'd written accusing Ravalli County offi cials of conuption. With his unsuccessful mayoral bid in its final days, Spreadbury approached Roddy in a parking lot and told her she had bener make lhe trespassing charge go away. That exchange, during which Roddy felt threatened, she later testified, prompted the felony intimidation charge. Fridsy's guilty plea follows the dismissal of Spreadbury's lawsuil against Roddy in civil court. He had been seeking $535,000 from Roddy for emotional distress caused by what he claimed was her giving "false information" to a police oflicer and judge during a protection hearing, Spreadbury filed the suit last April with two others seeking totaljudgments of$L2 million against Roddy, Hamilton City Attorney Ken Bell, RavalliCounty Attomey Ceorge Com and Depury County Attomey Angela Wetzsteon. Larson dismissed the other two lawsuits last month. Under the agreement reached Friday, Spreadbury will be on probation with the Montana Department ofCorrections, requiring the usual check-ins, loss ofprivacy and restrictions on his movements. He will also be forbidden from orvning or possessing firearms ofany kind. A former employee ofthe Federal Emergency Management Agency - Spreadbury claims he still maintains a federal security clearance - the Hamilton resident "must seek and maintain employment or a program approved by" probation o{Iicers. During Friday's hearing, Harkin added a timeline requiring Spreadbury's websites - BittenootRsins.com and MichaelSpreadburv.com - be clear of material pertaining to Roddy by Nov. 20. Reporter Sepp Jannotta can be reached at 363-3300 or sjannotta@ravallirepublic.com. htto://missoulian.com/news/state-and-resional/article 49e9b2la-d8d2- 1 l df-9bb2-001cc4c... 611212011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?