Warenback v. Neven et al

Filing 60

ORDER of USCA, Ninth Circuit. USCA Case Number 17-72096. The application for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition in the district court is denied as unnecessary because the applicant has a sectio n 2254 habeas petition currently pending before the United States District Court for the District of Nevada in case number 2:15-cv-01789-APG-VCF. The Clerk shall transfer the application and supplement to the district court to be processed as a motion to amend the currently pending section 2254 habeas petition. The motion shall be deemed filed in the district court on July 16, 2017. (Attachments: # 1 Application, # 2 Supplement)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 11of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 MOLLY C.. DWy`R CL R Zl-S.'COJ31TuPA# P 4L:S t-j- i 'tom fL, l 1 1 , /1rc~ 5 lIIC W A i N lid % 5 t FfLED. )6 Sa ~.~ 7 4ke U, S , C~ur C f`rcv ►+ tjvJcJ~S ~.t!(~2e`~3cX, Case ) J , PAZ17W.ry (L~ r7!9o2 ~, p i s W ort h—a(,K, p~ i; G~► r ~ ~~_ k 7 c e ( prT/vhereL (c at s~, he _Cv 6 r 4lie, C 1erK c 4ke_ - 0 e' _ Ise . a - Gee )sPJ~_ P-4'CAt Cf I sew 4 h~ s c l' - v' 7)i/r7. 5j n Ltcr ( W c t ppi~~c,fi`ph nt)fy\her, Z k!LS A ; ~h. Des 1 ..l../j the c , C f L~ y.!. eV .,-. pe-o y..~.er(1 ). iQ Aicl~ 1 - 41vc( pi-c r ,vN, J ke?rFsci 5ubcnce4) J reibéç 9- 13e 6 1 dI i p-vwr1 iys;_nfer cla Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 22of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 f 26o.S,L. s __ -Tl,~ (irr► ~ 22. -k (1 )(0) tern -R \ 4 4 0 P-4l c c 4e c- h i , frtc)ct 5hc (i pu1 cc uj r d_~ c ~- c o -- ke C u`rr ,r CWir%s pre vet coi1k hc~v Seen c .(scvv~(-eJ -4kroo~h ke e rise Oa . cWib-e'ce.__._ dt l~) u " '4k - cl -erri' yes e t. - i s +k ci co c~ hc eke. «. The_ a Fig el) d iscove c ". v t p edic de bec .e v ~l b o 41 i41ic. Tl hec;~' 1~e~ v.~, ,.e4*fo t _Cs ~1 cvv-Se( chid r Chc 7 e-4 aP Ake rrb lern wave rul 7 df~.er +4-k Q5( pe 44 j wttjed i~ tou e l vv► l d e d~ (i eAC-P cJ I r Ss . -~1 cle r- ,i~► ic-055_ h'td _ ► Pos- - c nurcfi'vo u4ue. Ah l -A r t ' i5(Q s~~r~ r ` o eo 1 4I e Cyr c % ke5 Arne ,_Thy4~ )1,1Ki p&smks m4- (i'vec.'. o~,~I o L1 e eceS .Je4'kaC d t`S_7 CDjniz~, fe- ? (Ap, eA(, e ts5ur. -- , = r `'p thi~ -_ mt k e --}u .-I-. C®u4s, S e~1Jpr piffcv vn fr r-Q41 e1t- Ii - o" s ,ctl i hc 1 ~ 37 Cj tit nAm+S ~44erv\ei cce&d 6 k€ .a to (e . CC'+: &r1j Put o4 ~!~1 c~~' 1(p2_ 5 a3 e - 1ed 4I~ ce- lec( cn 4he _ rv~~r►c~ (2-JPC3) Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 33of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 Two ice'vi pt'sjlot- ~j r'rors 1 ~n~ I) 77- (,4S d tr 4 ► rccee i!i3s OP 4 p w !`t n vrr`s ► JJ5 et rin~ 4D c, cerise ai 4 " . se x o ec er re J ' i" Si-r-fue., 41d Z,) -1 e ~n31r Wws na+- ~aecG( Lle -6 4 x_ NSc . c I N)Sc_ c sm se4 the- rpe J yin case, n,), 714 3 -, c v4á 4 -f-o receivin 4he Cdl d i7 ~~ Z ulre- d re ,i ed 4k " T et-h" 'd l j , one _ c 4ltL- je v'r hs ps+4k ► - o have 6 iect ' AtI "d p oCe4tu-wt b J`. Qlf ftOm€, Cut ~~y 1 diiV ~e e ve_ 1-ka, 3 k te. __d i l e vcc ~ ~~► rs 5e trn ccpq Cwt u Urlj 2 J4s 5i' i /i7f t 6, reciev?c 4 tV $G AS lt- 'rp r'C j I o' 7 t 1 Z t1, Ri r) he c J, c, rn - nsA-r"ks 1 U CAAI G4~S►'tt~t~v~/ ( 1~1 cC fi41 ` c cl v5I/ J 4'k ri o rcei4 A rrn~ Lc v&ecf J On 7(1 11 1 Ise rros - cep vim uJtd ble SiSbr•~ ►cam U~ 4 Q .. rr~ e ZZ f h' rr ors e lei c ~ +,r 1u br~ 41 , i)- - -4- is ~~~cl deA V U ~r ~, rn~~d c -l4 e t'r[wep ur &( t ho. sr`cbk C Jfi $ es (v•j 1'° Iec e") Ze, J ,SeC~ Z24- C uc - i ce Under pea 1f 3L 2OOf Z O I ll 2ac Z :Dvjo i s LJ 1 Il IZcj24-., t b5f. c(a 1 6ae t3) Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 44of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 k Q0J6 As +/ n2e'VaACil- Name I tI2. )Z4Prison Number 1►^1igh ()fserl'c)z-~e Pn:co.t Place of Confinement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA DOJ60 (Full Name) W/W NGACK. , Petitioner, vs. ) CASE NO. (To be supplied by the Clerk) pr' 5S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ) PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2254 BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY ) (NOT SENTENCED TO DEATH) Q('f~vh N 1 t~iy s , Respondent,) (Name of Warden, Superintendent, jailor or ) authorized person having custody of petitioner) ) and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada . ----------------------------------------------1. Name and location of court, and name of judge, that entered the judgment of conviction you are challenging: ') TThc,t Ic is I i sirkf 6%)4- L o.i'V f'duj 2. Full date judgment of conviction was entered: 1Z / Ii / $ 3 3. Did you appeal the conviction? 4. Did you file a U i S4'i c)' Cou r4 (month/day/year) Yes A No. Date appeal decided: o' h Gvr rc4 i (Ie ( SPn+erCe x Yes _No. If yes, name the court and date the p~ _ HLY1 Ow i€j . (34,-<<e( / / in the state court? ens filed: `J was lo / 4- / 16 . Did you appeal from the denial of the petition for post-conviction relief or petition for writ of habeas corpus? . Yes _ No. Date the appeal was decided: 1 / I Z / 1 1 . Have all of the grounds stated in this petition been presented to the state supreme court? 5. Yes — No. If no, which grounds have not? Date you are mailing (or handing to correctional officer) this petition to this court: - / 2' / /7 Attach to this petition a copy of all state court written decisions regarding this conviction. ha,J tw rte'-e P o r ke r s uCtc4e j ou p t fc~ 117J nJ ~~-~~ (L) Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 55of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 6. Is this the first federal petition for writ of habeas corpus challenging this conviction? + Yes No. the 2;15- (V - Ui-1LJ If no, what was the prior case number? -ft P ycr (r4- GE t'vnc v t'1 prior action filed? Was the prio ction _ de ' d on the me ' or . And in what court was c1 a dJJ sed for pr edural res6nsheck he e of decisio . / . Are Y of the iss sin this P t n P~ c~~~1 one). ) p ' r petition? _ Yes _, o. If the pkcfase was deriid on the merits, has the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals given you permission to file this successive petition? — Yes _ No. 7. Do you have any petition, application, motion or appeal (or by any other means) now pending in any court regarding the conviction that you are challenging in this action? A Yes _ No. If yes, state the name of the court and the nature of the proceedings: ,Sze &c wer 63 Sib rr•, ~4ec 9111115, 4-Rilea 1 Ilb, cl Smi3 e d uyii k teaAr_ u lj Zh31i7. G0-'f1J pehl to ?1131i1 8. Case number of the judgment of conviction being challenged: c-~ -L6 7 3~-1 9. l. Length and terms of sentence(s): 10. c -I La -+~'v Start date and projected release date: ! it 21 i 2 ,) 12° 1 S 11. What was (were) the offense(s) for which you were convicted: pw Qr/8J it ch ( d 12. What was your plea? Y, Guilty _ Not Guilty _ Nolo Contendere. If you pleaded guilty or nolo contendere pursuant to a plea bargain, state the terms and conditions of the agreement: 13. Who was the attorney that represented you in theproceedings in state court? Identify whether the attorney was appointed, retained, or whether you represented yourself pro se (without counsel). Name of Attorney arraignment and plea &>-.r ('. Pw`ri S Appointed Retained Pro se c _ma _____ trial/guilty plea sentencing direct appeal 1St post-conviction petition appeal from post conviction ~c 2nd post-conviction petition appeal from 2nd post-conviction 2 Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 66of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 State concisely every ground for which you claim that the state court conviction and/or sentence is unconstitutional. Summarize briefly the facts supporting each ground. You may attach up to two extra pages stating additional . supporting facts. You must raise in this petition all grounds for relief that relate to this conviction. Any grounds not raised in this petition will likely be barred from being litigated in a subsequent action. GROUND 1 I allege that my state court 11 sentence u "alt unco nstitutional, in violation of my Amendment right to doe, proce&S v' IQC based on these facts: 81 ftIeci&ds, Wr eo r m 4 ;uct er,en~ kconyic~-ion ,se ~pendirc, U,S..di +riJ ro~4 ruse nc. (tuevcc.43 2:~ car-Oi78'J-Ap6 - /CF eC t^22e'LkbI+IS,o ue 1 Ia'r s 2o --Zi,S~TPA Ni V,N(~ at- CNILO(tct acar' .`n v ~ci'icv n4 -Ps 14 RS F-W-u6yla- elrts&i(S~-rc-lzr#e7 20l ,3a 0 (1~iGl4 p ale L1 Imes 23 sh-F s1 To 4 ' 1,y r --- (tzo t AOMTitS - iG, 1lc s 1-t3 A►~piZlUlliA(~~,~he Deky-kn4 iS oROGRCO - b I EC TGR as o- Sex o1 ecdec In ctCC,)nAon e c i h ►JP.S [7M, Nu..veveft s„tn+ Vo kJSC's er ô c sc&` (asc nm, ~ lye Z e Z~ jine i s# kcL.,cre also M, ~ - Ney , S+~. '„ Ch 13i,,, Z a+ 2'f S yb CPoemef vverst0r P iyl~~ 2.0\ -hoc) „1 , epc4tcS erg. o'4k. eore,5'4z?ce7"N25 Zot 3oo : Pc{ ►cler~'n Tfrk t-aAa,d s -2o 1.300 (14)[D ►e L , o- 2 o l , 3OO ,, H-oc s +ka+ > ss ble ? T CSC moils h A tc s- hg`s obviws d►scl~~x;nc~.~ -why? - ba c.~fscreau~csj s ekaiatnel ct, m i plea he~~i~w e ?~eXh~b~ f I2?r~ eZt I t'r e 1 +thes " C3cd h 4kc¶t-at d *. O Arn<z e ckiirk u s -Inc`p=ViC)is r.&xe- o^-Jer isra, t-6294, e #jSCecPz eI- b \— S f Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 77of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 unconstitutional. S brieflythets supporting a marizeZ extra pages s ing additional grounds r relief that relate t ground. You may ch up to tw r support' g facts. You must ra' in this petiti all on. iiçgrounds not raised4this petition ill likely be barred from being litig ed in a subseque action. GROUND $ I c a-,N+invec L'3 I allege that my state court conviction and/or sentence are unconstitutional, in violation of my Amendment right to based on these facts: , kcKn:Aw ►ed.kedd 4k s Pty 4ej Ch ~2 w-,d J 4i~rer to u,~l.j- Rur -- c s t c•1 }~-- 4.e ~, k►a~s chui L)L'se 4d M4 soive. u~.o d pr,xedur dQ c i". ° iShe~.~L bc..ti~ 5 T't~P`i~e' Grn~d i3 aciJe., From+be- unoea(,Pr~ uA-PirMu11cc=_ c,~~~er(n,,~ ► yc~L) T 2 Ijne5 (-414 S[_ ect ` -_ NZS l) L I l D• atCYI feyi'red peN'o \5 Co ti coed L,tcfl`tres in.rol4inti a. ld I+~c lJcl<oly a,\ "Uc,~en<c~ ~n „okl in % oc'nLl c~r-~nu o pm-,- #cJ eq rs.; -on -6 I J RS 2. Sou -b tot;34,incl~s;y~'~,"~ - w, he I c .A +X ô-41- uJ<tnG o 2o13on (i Y&C2K bXZ) i 5 p pert "e s e der b'.c i c cJi e b (*WY-' 41X yt1SG`5 Ski c r~► , ~d. u,f Imes -S .'' l Val w ►► eLcV%'s wccense- wc,LS dewy e4Ca"pacc&_ byi44- przaikSlo'1.--•1' 1'S 1-7ci0,Z(0(3~ -joes il- impi fef14)1 ir1C[1~re .%Jo Lv t/1 trn1+ .. (k~rG edurcdt ,, deed—ye 41 cA IcJS, not l k ex~s~a~t s~bsed-'o'+ o(\ ro ,)ubsecha' ' C40 1 be tnc(xled fin - he trd h W Ls n , 4 , ' r,1 eri y~l d he cui1-kori -no ~- er- ecs CL,-> e-.Z QL enL. 0-r '' (i d, Ck 1 ~f es Lo --► l) ®k~ere in tie- ' 4ke. (► trle r- Ctr~ei4 Ore of--}1.e gb~ j±e NSCs ejre 04k. td-i i s c- &r 40J CO; O cLt ei1 W rvers a'('w c rv~ c&s&' The N S C 4;1.s 4 te.0 i (I v'uJs si cne r S frn &1'34. f i~ 624 rJ SC es~Zibl?shy ,n 1-►.~:u; - The d; st-n s w e `` c~.slc~ 0~ :1 I' a,J t d ececk T dc~i s 4. Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 88of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 extra pages sta ' additional gr factsmust s and/or s j pefffig= raise 1 his pe ion all in this P etitiodwill likely round r relief that r e to this conic ' .Any r An be 45red from bciig litigated in a su sequent action. GROUND I I J 4 [23 I allege that my state court conviction and/or sentence are unconstitutional, in violation of my Amendment right to , based on these facts: A l ei~l d ekA--hi on a "o 4 r" L O s ern cy M e r ea.Se tctw wPt- - e Nsc r o , is Mplle+-k -fie I ► i; IJei.. 34, (Z o 2),s ," \&Je C4Ad' Ae kk IJeuutAa' ca„teax'ncg , ss,c cc iQ r r 5 (siral- n and n SL- Hor, is erve_ 1u'_ ck J aLise n+ of col lu cul ev p1 e&--- ?'s i'()J riccJ1'QI = T1 r vi FeLpra.,t P& -~v& thM s rk,v,e was b -~rPcfe' c is ru i'u'1 s4l .►rtivr fi'nU my r+ e a( illec,a~l~ , (o Sn+he. Cu^r*n ` u mwc_c . p&- e' 1, I roes S-6 sycje .” Utrrnky,tk asserici k' e Feel. esa I T ~ -~i fi~un . Exhaustion of state court remeds regardingG}'ound 3: ► DeIppe Did y raise this issue on direct aeal from the conviction to ? Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 99of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page of 10 ► Direct Appeal: Did you raise this issue on direct appeal from the conviction to the Nevada Supreme Court? _ Yes X No. If no, explain why not: kbe.si s 9u +k i s o e-l- o r is b t.s,ed uni +kc N S L 1S iar1 ► Cob Ln 4- a.:praeal +~~-v^► i M _ k' X43 . First Post Conviction: Did you raise this issue in a t me ho- to corveeGr a11e~ l Se~J e~ce Yes . No. If no, explain why not: If yes, name of court: t 7 P i i e 4 4 1411 ~ 3'c1a` c r cJ s? 4 ' date itienfiled / D / 4-. // ~S iY' 4 Did you receive an evidentiary hearing? _ Yes ~C No. Did you appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court?J Yes — No. If no, explain why not: If yes, did you raise this issue?. Yes — No. If no, explain why not: ► Second Post Conviction: Did you raise this issue in a second petition for post conviction relief or state petition for habeas corpus? _ Yes — No. If yes, explain why: If yes, name of court: date petition filed / / Did you receive an evidentiary hearing? _ Yes _ No. Did you appeal to the Nevada Supreme Court?_ Yes — No. If no, explain why not: If yes, did you raise this issue?__ Yes ► No. If no, explain why not: Other Proceedings: Have you pursued any other procedure/process in an attempt to have your conviction and/or sentence overturned based on this issue (such as administrative remedies)? — Yes _ No. If yes, explain: State concisely every ground for which you claim that the state court conviction and/or sentence is 4', (5o 10) Case: 17-72096, 11/16/2017, ID: 10656532, DktEntry: 6-3,Page 10 of 10 Case: 17-72096, 07/31/2017, ID: 10529260, DktEntry: 2, Page 10 of 10 r (Name of person who wrote this complaint if not Plaintiff ) (Signature of Plaintiff) 7vlH 2O 2L)C7 (Date) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney's address & telephone number) DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY I understand that a false statement or answer to any question in this declaration will subject me to penalties of perjury. I DECLARE UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THAT THE FOREGOING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. See 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and 18 U.S.C. § 1621. Executed at 4( 3 De'Se4 $ 4 Pt'iSvv on (Location) 2-° 2-J17. (late) 1 II2 2A (Signature) (Inmate prison number) (to d to)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?