Doiron v. Byrd et al

Filing 7

///ORDER approving 4 Report and Recommendation re 1 Complaint, recommending the district judge should dismiss all of the claims asserted in Doiron's complaint except his claim alleging a violation of his right to privacy in his medical information as outlined. So Ordered by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante.(jb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/23/2016: # 1 Signed Order) (jb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Arthur Doiron v. Civil No. 16-cv-327-JL Cammie Byrd, et al. O R D E R No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated October 26, 2016. “‘[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.’” School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. ValenciaCopete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal). SO ORDERED. ____________________________ Joseph N. Laplante United States District Judge Date: December 21, 2016 cc: Arthur Doiron, pro se

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?