Alexander et al v. Cahill et al
Filing
20
RESPONSE in Opposition re 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Gary L. Casella, Rita E. Adler, Mark S. Ochs, Anthony J. Gigliotti, Daniel A. Drake, Vincent L. Scarsella, Thomas J. Cahill, Diana Maxfield Kearse. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) DVD traditionally filed# 2 Memorandum of Law # 3 Exhibit(s) 1 to Memorandum of Law# 4 Exhibit(s) 2 to Memorandum of Law# 5 Exhibit(s) 3 to Memorandum of Law# 6 Exhibit(s) 4 to Memorandum of Law# 7 Exhibit(s) 5 to Memorandum of Law# 8 Exhibit(s) 6 to Memorandum of Law# 9 Notice of Cross-Motion)(MacRae, Patrick) Modified on 4/2/2007 (bjw, ).
Alexander et al v. Cahill et al
Doc. 20 Att. 1
Case 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL
Document 20-2
Filed 03/27/2007
Page 1 of 1
STATE OF NEW YORK OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
ANDREW M. CUOMO
ATTORNEY GENERAL
DIVISION OF REGIONAL OFFICES
SYRACUSE REGIONAL OFFICE
March 27, 2007 LAWRENCE K. BAERMAN Clerk of the U.S. District Court U.S. Courthouse & Federal Bldg. P.O. Box 7367 100 South Clinton Street Syracuse, NY 13261-7367 Re: Alexander, et al. v. Cahill, et al. 5:07-cv-0118 (FJS)(GHL)
Dear Mr. Baerman: Presently pending before the Court is plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction, scheduled for consideration by the Court on April 13, 2007. Your undersigned represents the defendants in this matter and will file electronically an opposition to the motion. Enclosed is a DVD to be filed by traditional means as Exhibit 1 to your undersigned's affidavit in opposition to plaintiffs' motion. Please provide this DVD to the Court. Yours truly, s/Patrick F. MacRae Patrick F. MacRae cc: Gregory A. Beck, Esq. Public Citizen Litigation Group 1600 20th Street, NW Washington, DC 20009
615 Erie Blvd. West, Suite 102, Syracuse, N.Y. 13204 _ (315) 448-4800 _ Fax (315) 448-4853 * NOT FOR SERVICE OF PAPERS http://www.oag.state.ny.us
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?