Alexander et al v. Cahill et al

Filing 20

RESPONSE in Opposition re 6 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Gary L. Casella, Rita E. Adler, Mark S. Ochs, Anthony J. Gigliotti, Daniel A. Drake, Vincent L. Scarsella, Thomas J. Cahill, Diana Maxfield Kearse. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) DVD traditionally filed# 2 Memorandum of Law # 3 Exhibit(s) 1 to Memorandum of Law# 4 Exhibit(s) 2 to Memorandum of Law# 5 Exhibit(s) 3 to Memorandum of Law# 6 Exhibit(s) 4 to Memorandum of Law# 7 Exhibit(s) 5 to Memorandum of Law# 8 Exhibit(s) 6 to Memorandum of Law# 9 Notice of Cross-Motion)(MacRae, Patrick) Modified on 4/2/2007 (bjw, ).

Alexander et al v. Cahill et al

Doc. 20 Att. 5

Case 5:07-cv-00117-FJS-GHL

Document 20-6

Filed 03/27/2007

Page 1 of 1

SUBSCRIBE TO cLaP

-

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

SEARCH - CLBP -

.

-.

a

RSSIAtom Feed

Freezing of Exempt Funds
The Christian Science Monitor has an article here about the freezing of exempt funds in bank accounts, the problems the practice causes for
consumers, and the resulting legal issues. (Disclosure: the article quotes my colleague, Professor Gina Calabrese).
RECENT POSTS
.

To subscribe by email, enter your address:

~...

-

Freezing of Exempt Funds Another Week, Another Ninth Circuit CAFA Ruling Retailers Demanding Thumbprints: A New Trend? New Predatory Lending Leqislation a Possibility

A B O U T US

-

... . .. . .. .... .. ... Ported by J ~ f S o v e ~ n Tuesday. March 20, 2007 a t f on >7:15 AM i n Other Debt and Credit lssues j Permalink

I

Comments (0) ' TrackBack (0)

www.clpblog.org
The contributors to this blog are a divene group of lawyers and law professors who practice, teach, or write about consumer law and policy. Although the blog is h a t e d by Public Citizen's Consumer Justice Project, the viem expressed here are solely those of the individual contributon and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions with which they are affiliated. To view the blog's statement of policies, please click here.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Comparative Consumer Insolvency Conference Schedule Releared The "Check Float'' Is On Its Way Out Niqhtline To Tackle Debt and Credit Issues Tonight Wal-Mart Uses Digital Millennium Copyright Act Aqainst Consumer Bloq Do Companies Ignore Consumel Complaints? Identity Theft Incentives

Another Week, Another Ninth Circuit CAFA Ruling
Brian Wolfman
It appears that the Ninth Circuit has a rule

COORDINATORS Deepak Gupta Public Citizen Litigation Group Jeff Sovern St. John's Univerrity School of Law

OTHER CONTRIBUTORS Richard Alderman

requiring it to issue a t least one decision about the Class Action Fairness Act every week. I recently blogged here and here on new Ninth Circuit CAFA decisions, the latter of which (Progressive West v. Preciado) addressed when a post-CAFA amendment to a pre-CAFA statecourt complaint "relates back" to that complaint. In i t s most recent decision, McAtee v. Capital One, No. 07-55065 ( 9 t h Cir. Mar. 16, 2007), the Ninth C i r c u i t expounded on Preciado and held that any amendment to an original class action complaint filed in California state court, whether to add new causes of action, to

"Maxed Out" Opens in Theaters Today
Another Ninth Circuit CAFA Decision E Considering Consumer Class U Actions Governmental Privileqes for Private Corporationr: What's the Stoppinq Point?

Dockets.Justia.com