Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al

Filing 115

DECLARATION of Dr. Richard Boulanger in Support re: 85 SECOND MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Brian Transeau. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B (part 1)# 3 Exhibit B (part 2)# 4 Exhibit B (part 3)# 5 Exhibit B (part 4))(Ahrens, Julie)

Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al

Doc. 115 Att. 3

BOULANGER SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION EXHIBIT B FIGURES B8A ­B8P To illustrate some of the obvious differences between the original Aparthenonia and Bust Dat Groove (w/o ride), figures B8A ­ B8D (selected from the Rebuttal Report submitted on September 21, 2006 and therein labeled 7b,7c,7d,7h), show differences in audio waveforms and overall rhythmic pattern (B8A); difference in pitch contour and content (B8B); difference in spectral content via the FFT sonogram view (B8C); difference in spectral content via overlays using the FFT spectral view (B8D).

B8A: B8a_WS_WaveformComp(rebuttal7b)

10

Dockets.Justia.com

B8B: B8b_WS_PitchComp(rebuttal7c)

11

B8C: B8c_WS_SonogramComp(rebuttal7d)

12

B8D: B8d_WS_SpectumOverlay(rebuttal7h) Further, figures B8E ­ B8P, (selected from the Rebuttal Report submitted on September 21, 2006 and therein labeled 8i, 8j, 8k, 8p, 8q, 8r, 8u, 8v, 8w, 8x, 8y, 8z), compare the FFT sonograms and the FFT spectrums of the original Aparthenonia and Bust Dat Groove (w/o ride) on a beat by beat basis and show them to be unique.

13

B8E: B8e_AU_Beat1_WaveSpec(rebuttal8i)

14

B8F: B8f_AU_Beat1_Apar_Spec(rebuttal8j)

15

B8G: B8g_AU_Beat1_Bust_Spec(rebuttal8k)

16

B8H: B8h_AU_Beat2_WaveSpec(rebuttal8p)

17