Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al

Filing 115

DECLARATION of Dr. Richard Boulanger in Support re: 85 SECOND MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Brian Transeau. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B (part 1)# 3 Exhibit B (part 2)# 4 Exhibit B (part 3)# 5 Exhibit B (part 4))(Ahrens, Julie)

Download PDF
Vargas et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al Doc. 115 Att. 5 BOULANGER SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION EXHIBIT B FIGURES B9A B9L To illustrate a comparatively large set of obvious differences between the recreated Aparthenonia and the original Bust Dat Groove (w/o ride), figures B9A B9E show differences in audio waveforms and overall rhythmic pattern (B9A); difference in pitch contour and content (B9B); difference in spectral content via the FFT sonogram view (B9C); difference in spectral content via overlays using the FFT spectral view (B9D). B9A: B9a_WS_WaveformComp 26 Dockets.Justia.com B9B: B9b_WS_PitchComp B9C: B9c_WS_SonogramComp 27 B9D: B9d_WS_SpectrumOverlay Further, figures B9E B9L, compare the FFT sonograms and the FFT spectrums of the recreated Aparthenonia and the original Bust Dat Groove (w/o ride) on a beat by beat basis and show them to be unique as well. 28 B9E: B9e_AU_Beat1_WavSono B9F: B9f_AU_Beat1_WavSpec 29 B9G: B9g_AU_Beat2_WavSono B9H: B9h_AU_beat2_WavSpec 30 B9I: B9i_AU_beat3_WavSono B9J: B9j_AU_beat3_WavSpec 31 B9K: B9k_AU_beat4_WavSono B9L: B9l_AU_beat4_WavSpec 32 BOULANGER SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION EXHIBIT B FIGURES B10A B10F To illustrate that there are no spectral matches between any of the percussion sounds in Recreated Aparthenonia and the original Bust Dat Groove (w/o ride), regardless of where these percussion sounds appear in the pattern, figures B10A B10F show differences in audio waveforms and spectrum of "similar" sounds from different locations in the pattern. (Note: all sounds were normalized prior to the spectral analysis.) B10A compares the waveform and spectrum of the Bust snare to the Recreated snare from Beat 2; B10B compare the waveform and spectrum of the Bust "closed hat" at beat 1.5 with the Recreated "closed hat" at beat 1.5; B10C compares the simultaneous Bust "kick&hat" at beat 1.5 with the simultaneous Recreated "kick&hat" at beat 1; B10D compares the Bust "clean kick" at beat 4.5 with the Recreated "clean kick" at beat 1.5; B10E compares the Bust "open hat" at beat 3.5 with the Recreated "open hat" (not really an open hat in this case) at beat 3.5; and finally B10F compares the Bust "snare roll" at beat 2.5 with the Recreated "snare roll" at beat 4.5. Regardless of where the "similar" percussion events are taken from the pattern, none of them is an extremely close waveform or spectral match. B10A: B10A_AU_Beat2_BustSnareVsRecreatedSnare_WaveSpec 33 B10B: B10B_AU_Beat2_BustClosedHatVsRecreatedClosedHat_WaveSpec B10C: B10C_AU_Beat1.5_BustKickHatVsRecreatedBeat1KickHat_WaveSpec 34 B10D: B10D_AU_Beat4.5_BustKickVsBeat1.5RecreatedKicK_WaveSpec B10E:B10E_AU_Beat3.5_BustOpenHatVsBeat4.5_RecreatedOpenHat_WaveSpec 35 B10F: B10F_AU_Beat2.5_BustRollVsBeat4.5_RecreatedRoll_WaveSpec 36

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?