Viacom International, Inc. et al v. Youtube, Inc. et al

Filing 225

DECLARATION of William M. Hohengarten (Part Thirteen) Ex. 353 in Support re: 176 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment /Viacom's Notice of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability and Inapplicability of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act Safe Harbor Defense.. Document filed by Country Music Television, Inc., Paramount Pictures Corporation, Viacom International, Inc., Black Entertainment Television, LLC, Comedy Partners. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 354, # 2 Exhibit 355, # 3 Exhibit 356, # 4 Exhibit 357, # 5 Exhibit 358, # 6 Exhibit 359, # 7 Exhibit 360, # 8 Exhibit 361, # 9 Exhibit 362, # 10 Exhibit 363, # 11 Exhibit 364, # 12 Exhibit 365, # 13 Exhibit 366, # 14 Exhibit 367, # 15 Exhibit 368, # 16 Exhibit 369, # 17 Exhibit 370, # 18 Exhibit 371, # 19 Exhibit 372, # 20 Exhibit 373, # 21 Exhibit 374, # 22 Exhibit 375, # 23 Exhibit 376, # 24 Exhibit 377, # 25 Exhibit 378, # 26 Exhibit 379, # 27 Exhibit 380, # 28 Exhibit 381, # 29 Exhibit 382, # 30 Exhibit 383, # 31 Exhibit 384, # 32 Exhibit 385, # 33 Exhibit 386, # 34 Exhibit 387, # 35 Exhibit 388)(Kohlmann, Susan)

Download PDF
From: Sent: To: Cc: Steve Chen Sunday, June 26, 2005 11 :05 AM Chad Hurley -cchad@youtube.com? Karim Jawed Re: crappy videos Subject: I think we should reject them. I agree. I agree with your stance. We have to look at each of them carefully but the uploading of an entire season of shows is just stupid. -s On .Iun 26, 2005, at 12:03 PM, Chad Hurley wrote: ;: Yo guys, ;: ;: This user, TheOCRox3 I I, is uploading crappy videos... like the ;: entire season finale of "Channed" in 5 parts. ;: ;: I really want to start rejecting copyiighted material now. I think ;: the key to our success is personal videos. If we are going to build ;: this service, I think we should do it right and start enron.ing Videos" or "Bittorrent". ;: this mle. We are not another" Stupid ;: ;: Viral videos are fine, like the airplane videos you found on the ;: web or funny commercials people upload. But when it blatantly comes ;: from a network or movie, we shouldn't mcss around... we arc going ;: to be big and will perhaps someday even offer premium contcnt, so I ;: don't ,vant to get sued or piss anyone off. ;: :; What do you think? Do you care if I reject all of "TheOCRox311 's" ;: crap right now? ;: ;: -Chad ;: ¡'- DEPONENT: Hv ~, t- (. CASE: Viacom, et aI., v. YouTube, et aI., The Football Association Premier League, et aI., v. YouTube, et aI., DATE: i.:i 'l . OC EXHIBIT# '7 Case Nos. 07-CV-2203 and 07-CV-3582 A. Ignacio Howard, CLR, RPR, CSR No. 9830 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY JK00005597 REDESIGNATED CONFIDENTIAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?