Schoolcraft v. The City Of New York et al
Filing
560
DECLARATION of Joshua P. Fitch (Master Declaration) in Support re: 559 MOTION for Attorney Fees , Costs and Disbursements.. Document filed by Adrian Schoolcraft. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Jon L. Norinsberg, Esq., # 2 Exhibit B - Declaration of Nathaniel Smith, Esq., # 3 Exhibit C - Declaration of Joshua P. Fitch, Esq., # 4 Exhibit D - Declaration of Gerald M. Cohen, Esq., # 5 Exhibit E - Declaration of John Lenoir, Esq., # 6 Exhibit F - Declaration of Howard A. Suckle, Esq., # 7 Exhibit G - Declaration of Magdalena Bauza, # 8 Exhibit H - Billing Entries and Costs for Jon L. Norinsberg, Esq., # 9 Exhibit I - Billing Entries and Costs for Nathaniel Smith, Esq., # 10 Exhibit J - Billing Entries for Joshua P. Fitch, Esq., # 11 Exhibit K - Billing Entries and Costs for Gerald M. Cohen, Esq., # 12 Exhibit L - Billing Entries for John Lenoir, Esq., # 13 Exhibit M - Billing Entries for Howard A. Suckle, Esq., # 14 Exhibit N - Billing Entries for Magdalena Bauza, # 15 Exhibit O - Declaration of Jonathan Abady, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Jon L. Norinsberg, Esq., # 16 Exhibit P - Declaration of Christopher Galiardo, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Jon L. Norinsberg, Esq., # 17 Exhibit Q - Declaration of Afsaan Saleem, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Jon L. Norinsberg, Esq., # 18 Exhibit R - Declaration of Michael L. Spiegel, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Nathaniel Smith, Esq., # 19 Exhibit S - Declaration of Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Joshua P. Fitch, Esq. and Gerald M. Cohen, Esq., partners of Cohen & Fitch LLP, # 20 Exhibit T - Declaration of Irving Cohen, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Joshua P. Fitch, Esq. and Gerald M. Cohen, Esq., partners of Cohen & Fitch LLP, # 21 Exhibit U - Declaration of Katherine Smith, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Joshua P. Fitch, Esq. and Gerald M. Cohen, Esq., partners of Cohen & Fitch LLP, # 22 Exhibit V - Declaration of Hugh M. Mo, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of John Lenoir, Esq., # 23 Exhibit W - Declaration of Jeffrey Schlanger, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of John Lenoir, Esq., # 24 Exhibit X - Declaration of David Finkler, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Howard A. Suckle, Esq., # 25 Exhibit Y - Declaration of Mitchell Bloch, Esq. in support of the hourly rate of Howard A. Suckle, Esq., # 26 Exhibit Z - 2013-2014 National Law Journal Billing Survey of Large Firm Billing Rates, # 27 Exhibit AA - 2013-2014 New York City Law Department Year in Review for the Special Federal Litigation Division, # 28 Exhibit BB - New York City Law Department Special Federal Litigation Homepage, # 29 Exhibit CC - Verdict Search's Top Verdicts of 2013, # 30 Exhibit DD - Super Lawyers 2015 Annual List of Top Lawyers in the New York Metro Area, # 31 Exhibit EE - Order in Bernabe v. City of New York, 13 CV 5531 (LGS) relating to Mr. Norinsberg's hourly rate)(Fitch, Joshua)
EXHIBIT
“G”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------------------X
ADRIAN SCHOOLCRAFT,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
-against)
10 Civ. 6005 (RWS)
)
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
---------------------------------------------------------------X
DECLARATION OF MAGDALENA BAUZA IN SUPPORT OF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND
OTHER DISCRETIONARY COSTS PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C.§
1988 AND FED. R. CIV. PROC. 54(d)
MAGDALENA BAUZA declares, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746 and under penalty of
perjury, as follows:
1.
I am a law graduate who worked with Nathaniel B. Smith and John Lenoir,
attorneys in this case. I submit this declaration in support of this motion for costs, expenses and
reasonable attorneys’ fees, pursuant to the terms of the Offer of Judgment, 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and
Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 54(d)(2).
2.
I started work on the Schoolcraft case in March of 2013. At that time, Mr. Smith
was lead counsel on the case and I received my assignments from him and was directly
supervised by him.
3.
I seek reasonable fees in the amount of $193,175.00, representing 1273:05 hours
of work at the hourly rate of $150 per hour, and 29:30 hours of travel at the rate of $75 per hour.
4.
In making this request I have researched the rates of other law graduates like
myself and based on that research I submit that a rate of $150 per hour is a reasonable hourly rate
1
for an individual with my level of experience. In reaching this conclusion, I have relied
primarily on Zahrey v. City of New York, Slip Op. 98-cv-4546; Dkt. # 264 (DCP) (JCF)
(S.D.N.Y. June 8, 2010) (report and recommendation by Magistrate Judge Francis), which
concluded that $150 per hour was a reasonable hourly rate as of 2010 for a law graduate.
My Background
5.
I received my BFA degree, with honors, from The City University of New York
in May 2003. I began my law education at CUNY School of Law in August of 2011. From
August 2014 to December 2014, I was a legal intern at the Legal Aid Society Health Law
Division. I received my Juris Doctor degree from CUNY School of Law in December of 2014.
6.
Attached as Exhibit N are true and correct copies of my annual time records in
this case for the three years, 2013, 2014 and 2015. The time records, which reflect a total of
1520.4 hours, are based on my contemporaneous logging of my work hours as the work was
performed. In 2013, I recorded my time into my word processing program upon completion of
the task or at the end of the day. This data was then provided to Mr. Smith’s office and entered
into the Time Slips office database. Beginning in 2014 and through 2015, I used Toggl, a time
tracking software program that allows me to record my work hours in real time.
7.
My time records reflect in detail the work I did on behalf of the plaintiff. In
summary, my work involved the following: conducting legal research relating to the numerous
issues in this litigation such as First Amendment rights; Monell liability; Fourth Amendment
violations; state action; the intracorporate conspiracy doctrine; qualified immunity; tortious
interference with prospective employment opportunity; the collective knowledge doctrine;
intentional infliction of emotional distress; various negligence causes of actions, medical
malpractice and vicarious liability; prior restraint in response to a gag order motion; false
2
imprisonment and legal justification under Mental Health Law 9.39; and conducting research on
various evidentiary and federal procedural issues as they arose. My work also included assisting
counsel in conducting inspections at the 81st Precinct and Jamaica Hospital; assisting the
investigator on the case in conducting separate interviews of Carol and Ted Stretmoyer (two
witnesses to the Oct. 31, 2009 events); assisting the investigator in canvassing the Queens
neighborhood and prior residence of plaintiff where the events of Oct. 31, 2009 occurred and
interviewing neighbors; drafting and revising jury instructions (in response to this Court’s
summary judgment decision and motion for reconsideration) relating to plaintiff’s numerous
claims; preparing for and attending 23 depositions; drafting portions of summary judgment
motions, opposition papers, reply papers, motions for reconsideration, memorandum of law in
support of motion to amend and motion in limine opposition; and summarizing the deposition
and drafting the direct examination of Professor Eterno, the main police practices expert.
8.
My time records reflect that I attended 23 depositions, for a total of 169 hours.
Since Mr. Smith and Mr. Lenoir were also attending those depositions, I am not seeking
compensation as the “third chair” for that time, other than the deposition of Larry Schoolcraft,
which was attended only by Mr. Lenoir and me. Thus, my time charges reflect a reduction of
153 hours for the 22 depositions that I attended as the third person on behalf of the plaintiff.1 For
the 30-month period, from February 2013 to September 2015, I billed a total of 1520:40 hours.
After the adjustment for the depositions the total billable hours are 1367:40. Accordingly, the
total adjusted fee is $205,150.00.
1
The 2013 time record reflects an entry of “No Charge” for depositions that I attended
that year. The depositions I attended in 2014 and 2015 are reflected in the time records as
unbillable hours on the top of the first page of the reports. The reports also reflect the deposition
time entries without any dollar calculation.
3
9.
My time charges should also be adjusted for time spent travelling. The time
entries reflect that on six occasions I travelled to meet the plaintiff or other witnesses in this case.
The travel time for these six trips totals 29:30 hours, and in accordance with established practice
and decisions in this District, that time should be billing at one half of my requested hourly rate
(or $75 per hour). Based on this travel adjustment, my total time charges should be reduced by $
2,212.50. Thus, the total adjusted fee is $202,937.50.
10.
Finally, my time charges have already been adjusted to reflect that fees are
compensable only up to the date of the Offer of Judgment, September 16, 2015. Accordingly,
the last page of my time records for 2015 reflect 65:05 hours of unbillable time spent after
September 16, 2015 on the case. Thus, my total adjusted compensable billing is $ 193,175.00.
11.
Much of the time I expended on the Schoolcraft case was spent conducting legal
researching, writing memoranda to Mr. Smith and Mr. Lenoir on the results of that research,
drafting portions of the numerous memorandum of law and the proposed jury instruction
submitted in this case to the Court. I respectfully submit that the work I performed was
reasonable and necessary for the proper representation of Officer Schoolcraft.
Date: New York, New York
December 16, 2015
/S MB
By: ________________________________
Magdalena Bauza
4