Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 167

DECLARATION of Regina Griffin in Support re: 162 FIFTH MOTION in Limine To Deem Statements By Sterling Stamos Employees In The Course Of And In Connection With Their Employment By Sterling Stamos As Admissions of The Sterling Defendants.. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Filed Under Seal Pursuant to Protective Order, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15 -1, # 16 Exhibit 15 - 2)(Sheehan, David)

Download PDF
Exhibit 8 1 1 C O N F I D E N T I A L 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 11-CV-03605(JSR)(HBP) 3 4 5 --------------------------------x 6 IRVING H. PICARD, Trustee for the Liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC, 7 8 Videotaped Deposition of: Plaintiff, KEVIN OKIMOTO 9 10 11 12 vs. SAUL B. KATZ, et al., Defendants. --------------------------------x 13 14 15 Transcript of testimony as taken by and before 16 LESLIE ROCKWOOD, Certified Shorthand Reporter, RPR and 17 Notary Public of the State of California, at the offices 18 of Shearman & Sterling, Four Embarcadero, Suite 3800, 19 San Francisco, California, on Friday, January 6, 2012, 20 commencing at 9:39 a.m. 21 22 23 24 25 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL KEVIN OKIMOTO 1/6/12 2 1 A P P E A R A N C E S: 2 3 4 5 6 7 BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 BY: STACEY A. BELL, ESQ. BY: MELISSA L. KOSACK, ESQ. BY: REGINA L. GRIFFIN, ESQ. (Morning session only) sbell@bakerlaw.com mkosack@bakerlaw.com rgriffin@bakerlaw.com For Plaintiff, Irving H. Picard, Trustee 8 9 10 11 DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10017 BY: ANDREW DITCHFIELD, ESQ. andrew.ditchfield@davispolk.com For the Defendants 12 13 14 15 16 17 TANNENBAUM HELPERN SYRACUSE & HIRSCHTRITT LLP 900 Third Avenue New York, New York 10022 BY: TAMMY P. BIEBER, ESQ. BY: MARYANN C. STALLONE, ESQ. bieber@thsh.com stallone@thsh.com For the Witness and Sterling Stamos Capital Management, LP 18 19 20 21 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, New York 10022-6069 BY: ALAN S. GOUDISS, ESQ. (Morning session only) agoudiss@shearman.com For the Witness 22 23 Also Present: CYRIL SUSZCKIEWICZ, Videographer 24 25 BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL KEVIN OKIMOTO 1/6/12 24 1 Q. Would you put that at around 2002? 2 MS. BIEBER: 3 THE WITNESS: 4 MS. BELL: 5 THE WITNESS: 6 7 8 Objection. Yeah, I'm not certain -- You can answer. I'm not certain; however, it was likely in that range. Q. BY MS. BELL: Okay. When you joined Sterling Stamos in 2002 -- well, strike that. 9 Before you joined in 2002, did you meet with 10 Saul Katz? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Fred Wilpon? 13 A. No. 14 Q. David Katz? 15 A. No. 16 Q. When you joined Sterling Stamos in 2002, what 17 18 19 did you understand your responsibilities to be? A. Varied. Part client responsibilities, part manager due diligence, part operational responsibilities. 20 Q. Anything else? 21 A. No. 22 Q. Who did you report to? 23 A. Tom Olds was my original boss. 24 Q. Did that change at some point? 25 A. It did. BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL KEVIN OKIMOTO 1/6/12 31 1 2 Stamos? A. Anybody who expressed a serious desire to 3 invest in the funds and we believed to be qualified, we 4 would send them to. 5 Q. 6 And how did you go about determining whether an investor was qualified, as you used that term? 7 MS. BIEBER: 8 You can answer. 9 THE WITNESS: 10 11 Objection. Through these preliminary discussions with them. Q. BY MS. BELL: Okay. Did there come a time 12 when your position changed from being an associate at 13 Sterling Stamos to something else? 14 A. Yes. 15 Q. Okay. 16 A. It was a very fluid situation. What did your position change to? It ultimately 17 translated to a partnership interest in the firm. 18 don't recall the specific titles and/or dates in terms of 19 the progression to that point. 20 21 Q. I I'm sorry, do you recall when you became a partner of Sterling Stamos? 22 A. I don't remember the specific dates. 23 Q. Okay. You testified earlier that you had 24 responsibility with respect to manager due diligence. 25 Can you tell me what you meant by that? BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193 PICARD v. KATZ, et al. CONFIDENTIAL KEVIN OKIMOTO 1/6/12 32 1 A. Sure. That lasted probably a month before I 2 changed responsibilities as a result of increasing demand 3 for coverage in other parts of our business, but within 4 the period of time in which I did focus a limited amount 5 of my time on manager research, it was focused on manager 6 sourcing, investor manager due diligence, and rough 7 discussions on portfolio construction concepts. 8 Q. What do you mean by "manager sourcing"? 9 A. Identifying the managers available to invest 10 within a particular asset class and trying to focus on 11 how we could potentially invest with them. 12 range of options were available to us. 13 14 15 Q. So what the And how did you go about identifying those managers? A. Multiple sources, commercial databases being 16 one, and introductions, referrals being the second 17 primary source. 18 Q. Any other sources? 19 A. Those were typically the two primary sources. 20 Q. And with respect to introductions and 21 referrals during the limited period for which you had 22 manager due diligence responsibilities, did you get any 23 introductions or referrals of managers from anyone? 24 MS. BIEBER: Objection. 25 You can answer. BENDISH REPORTING, INC. 877.404.2193

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?