Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al
Filing
23
DECLARATION of DANA M. SESHENS in Support re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss THE AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.. Document filed by Charles 15 Associates, Charles 15 LLC, Charles Sterling LLC, Charles Sterling Sub LLC, College Place Enterprises LLC, Coney Island Baseball Holding Company LLC, Estate of Leonard Schreier, FFB Aviation LLC, FS Company LLC, Fred Wilpon Family Trust, Arthur Friedman, Ruth Friedman, Iris J. Katz and Saul B. Katz Family Foundation, Inc., Judy and Fred Wilpon Family Foundation, Inc., Amy Beth Katz, David Katz, Dayle Katz, Gregory Katz, Howard Katz, Iris Katz, 157 J.E.S. LLC, Air Sterling LLC, BAS Aircraft LLC, Jason Bacher, Bon Mick Family Partners LP, Bon-Mick, Inc., Brooklyn Baseball Company LLC, C.D.S. Corp., Michael Katz, Saul B. Katz, Todd Katz, Katz 2002 Descendants' Trust, Heather Katz Knopf, Natalie Katz O'Brien, Mets II LLC, Mets Limited Partnership, Mets One LLC, Mets Partners, Inc., Minor 1 (REDACTED), Minor 2 (REDACTED), L. Thomas Osterman, Phyllis Rebell Osterman, Realty Associates Madoff II, Red Valley Partners, Robbinsville Park LLC, Ruskin Garden Apartments LLC, Saul B. Katz Family Trust, Michael Schreier, Deyva Schreier Arthur, See Holdco LLC, See Holdings I, See Holdings II, Sterling 10 LLC, Sterling 15C LLC, Sterling 20 LLC, Sterling Acquisitions LLC, Sterling American Advisors II LP, Sterling American Property III LP, Sterling American Property IV LP, Sterling American Property V LP, Sterling Brunswick Corporation, Sterling Brunswick Seven LLC, Sterling Dist Properties LLC, Sterling Equities, Sterling Equities Associates, Sterling Equities Investors, Sterling Heritage LLC, Sterling Internal V LLC, Sterling Jet II Ltd., Sterling Jet Ltd., Sterling Mets Associates, Sterling Mets Associates II, Sterling Mets LP, Sterling Pathogenesis Company, Sterling Third Associates, Sterling Thirty Venture LLC, Sterling Tracing LLC, Sterling Twenty Five LLC, Sterling VC IV LLC, Sterling VC V LLC, Edward M. Tepper, Elise C. Tepper, Jacqueline G. Tepper, Marvin B. Tepper, Valley Harbor Associates, Kimberly Wachtler, Philip Wachtler, Bruce N. Wilpon, Daniel Wilpon, Debra Wilpon, Fred Wilpon, Jeffrey Wilpon, Jessica Wilpon, Judith Wilpon, Richard Wilpon, Scott Wilpon, Valerie Wilpon, Wilpon 2002 Descendants' Trust, Robin Wilpon Wachtler. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S)(Wagner, Karen)
EXHIBIT K
1
1
C O N F I D E N T I A L
2
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
ADV. PRO. NO. 08-01789 (BRL)
3
4
5
-------------------------------x
SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION
CORPORATION,
Videotaped
6
Plaintiff-Applicant,
7
8
v.
BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT
SECURITIES, LLC,
Rule 2004
Examination of:
MARK PESKIN
(Vol. I)
9
10
Defendant.
-------------------------------x
In Re:
11
BERNARD L. MADOFF,
12
13
Debtor.
-------------------------------x
14
15
TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before
16
MONIQUE VOUTHOURIS, Certified Court Reporter, RPR,
17
CRR and Notary Public of the States of New York and
18
New Jersey, at the offices of Baker & Hostetler,
19
LLP, 45 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York on
20
Thursday, July 29, 2010, commencing at 10:15 a.m.
21
22
23
24
25
BENDISH REPORTING, INC.
Litigation Support Services
877.404.2193
www.bendish.com
2
1
A P P E A R A N C E S:
2
3
4
5
BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10111
BY: FERNANDO A. BOHORQUEZ, ESQ.
AMANDA E. FEIN, ESQ.
For Irving Picard, Trustee
6
7
8
9
DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL, LLP
450 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10017
BY: DANA M. SESHENS, ESQ.
KAREN E. WAGNER, ESQ.
For Sterling Equities, certain
affiliated entities, and the Witness
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
ALSO PRESENT:
GREGORY P. NERO, ESQ., Sterling Equities
DANIEL McCLUTCHY, Videographer
179
1
2
3
A.
This is the SEF lines of credit that
we spoke of before.
Q.
Okay.
Did you have any credit
4
facilities with Citibank that had a Madoff account
5
as collateral?
6
7
A.
Q.
I don't think we did.
Okay.
8
A.
9
that was B of A.
10
Q.
11
A.
12
Q.
13
A.
No,
Bank of America?
Yeah, yeah.
to Exhibit 6 --
14
I don't think -- as collateral?
15
16
Q.
19
20
21
22
23
Thank you.
So if we go back
Yeah.
-- under "Liquidity," there is
included a Madoff securities and SSP Capital?
17
18
Okay.
A.
Q.
Correct.
"SSP Capital" refers to Sterling
Stamos?
A.
Q.
Correct.
Why did you need to include Madoff in
this liquidity analysis?
A.
Well, I spoke about it before, that
24
the lines of credit required us to have so much
25
liquidity available if the line was called to be
180
1
paid back.
2
3
Q.
SEF?
4
5
This is the line of credit for the
A.
We're only talking about SEF now.
Q.
6
Right.
A.
There were several banks in the --
7
call it a syndicate of banks that gave us this
8
credit.
9
Citibank -- in this particular case,
10
Citibank asked us to please present in their -- with
11
their definition of liquidity -- with their
12
definition of liquidity a statement as to where we
13
were on a monthly basis or quarterly basis.
14
remember whether it was monthly or quarterly.
15
This indicates June 30th.
I can't
I know
16
that's a quarter.
17
or July.
18
negotiated.
19
form of accounting.
20
as to what their definition of compliance is.
21
I can't remember if there's a May
But this is very formulaic, is very
So this doesn't necessarily follow a
It is what Citibank agreed on
So Madoff was considered liquid
22
because it's a brokerage account.
You would call up
23
your broker and say I need my money back, and they
24
would sell securities and readily give it back to
25
you with short notice.
It took time to clear
181
1
through the process.
2
But the banks knew that Madoff was a
3
liquid -- you know, a liquid, you know, account and
4
near an equivalent, cash equivalent, because it was
5
short-term notice and easily liquidatable.
6
SSP capital, certain accounts within
7
certain fund investments that we had were more
8
liquid than others.
9
10
I'm not quite sure what the others
were, but we had other brokerage accounts.
11
Q.
12
A.
Like Prudential or -It was Maxim, it was Long Island
13
Investors, it was a whole bunch of other typical
14
brokerage accounts, no different than the Madoff
15
account, that we would call upon in need of cash if
16
we were in need of cash.
17
basis.
18
Q.
So that was the liquidity
And let me back up to one thing you
19
mentioned, and we can get two more questions in
20
before --
21
A.
22
23
24
25
Q.
Sure.
-- we have to change the tape.
What was your understanding of how
long -- let me back up.
What did Madoff represent to Sterling
186
1
broker who had a great reputation.
2
me am I worried that I had $181 million in JPMorgan.
3
4
5
6
It's like asking
I mean, I'm giving it to Citibank.
They're not concerned.
Q.
So that was my follow-up question.
Did Citibank ever raise any questions about the --
7
A.
No.
To the contrary, I think they
8
were very secure knowing that the money was in a --
9
a liquid asset.
10
If you also look at the right-hand --
11
excuse me, the left-hand column, "Fleet margin,
12
Fleet margin, Fleet margin," I mean, all of these
13
Fleet, which is now B of A, was exceedingly secure.
14
They gave us loans supported, collateralized by
15
Madoff.
16
That's how I understand first --
17
understood Madoff or got comfortable with Madoff,
18
because these double-up loans you talk about, it
19
took me, like, three seconds -- exaggeration -- ten
20
minutes to negotiate them because B of A was so
21
comfortable using Madoff.
22
It wasn't a matter of marking to
23
market.
It wasn't a matter of understanding the
24
collateral.
25
in Madoff.
Oh, Madoff.
Okay, fine, yeah, put it
It's going to be liquid.
187
1
2
Q.
And why was BOA so comfortable with
Madoff?
3
A.
B of A, I have to -- you have to ask
4
them.
I mean, they had other clients with Madoff.
5
They had other -- I believe other loans, tri-party
6
agreement type loans with Madoff.
7
8
If it was good enough for them, it
was sort of good enough for me.
9
10
Q.
And then last question on this
document --
11
(Comments off the record.)
12
MR. BOHORQUEZ:
13
break.
We'll change tapes.
14
15
Why don't we take a
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
record.
The time is 2:46.
Going off the
This ends tape number 3.
16
(Brief recess.)
17
THE VIDEOGRAPHER:
18
record.
19
20
The time is 3:02.
We are back on the
This is tape number 4.
MR. BOHORQUEZ:
This is Exhibit
No. 7.
21
(Exhibit MP-7 marked for
22
identification.)
23
BY MR. BOHORQUEZ:
24
25
Q.
Actually, I'm going to ask you one
more question on that and then we'll move on.