Irving H. Picard v. Saul B. Katz et al

Filing 23

DECLARATION of DANA M. SESHENS in Support re: 20 MOTION to Dismiss THE AMENDED COMPLAINT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT.. Document filed by Charles 15 Associates, Charles 15 LLC, Charles Sterling LLC, Charles Sterling Sub LLC, College Place Enterprises LLC, Coney Island Baseball Holding Company LLC, Estate of Leonard Schreier, FFB Aviation LLC, FS Company LLC, Fred Wilpon Family Trust, Arthur Friedman, Ruth Friedman, Iris J. Katz and Saul B. Katz Family Foundation, Inc., Judy and Fred Wilpon Family Foundation, Inc., Amy Beth Katz, David Katz, Dayle Katz, Gregory Katz, Howard Katz, Iris Katz, 157 J.E.S. LLC, Air Sterling LLC, BAS Aircraft LLC, Jason Bacher, Bon Mick Family Partners LP, Bon-Mick, Inc., Brooklyn Baseball Company LLC, C.D.S. Corp., Michael Katz, Saul B. Katz, Todd Katz, Katz 2002 Descendants' Trust, Heather Katz Knopf, Natalie Katz O'Brien, Mets II LLC, Mets Limited Partnership, Mets One LLC, Mets Partners, Inc., Minor 1 (REDACTED), Minor 2 (REDACTED), L. Thomas Osterman, Phyllis Rebell Osterman, Realty Associates Madoff II, Red Valley Partners, Robbinsville Park LLC, Ruskin Garden Apartments LLC, Saul B. Katz Family Trust, Michael Schreier, Deyva Schreier Arthur, See Holdco LLC, See Holdings I, See Holdings II, Sterling 10 LLC, Sterling 15C LLC, Sterling 20 LLC, Sterling Acquisitions LLC, Sterling American Advisors II LP, Sterling American Property III LP, Sterling American Property IV LP, Sterling American Property V LP, Sterling Brunswick Corporation, Sterling Brunswick Seven LLC, Sterling Dist Properties LLC, Sterling Equities, Sterling Equities Associates, Sterling Equities Investors, Sterling Heritage LLC, Sterling Internal V LLC, Sterling Jet II Ltd., Sterling Jet Ltd., Sterling Mets Associates, Sterling Mets Associates II, Sterling Mets LP, Sterling Pathogenesis Company, Sterling Third Associates, Sterling Thirty Venture LLC, Sterling Tracing LLC, Sterling Twenty Five LLC, Sterling VC IV LLC, Sterling VC V LLC, Edward M. Tepper, Elise C. Tepper, Jacqueline G. Tepper, Marvin B. Tepper, Valley Harbor Associates, Kimberly Wachtler, Philip Wachtler, Bruce N. Wilpon, Daniel Wilpon, Debra Wilpon, Fred Wilpon, Jeffrey Wilpon, Jessica Wilpon, Judith Wilpon, Richard Wilpon, Scott Wilpon, Valerie Wilpon, Wilpon 2002 Descendants' Trust, Robin Wilpon Wachtler. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S)(Wagner, Karen)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT K 1 1 C O N F I D E N T I A L 2 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ADV. PRO. NO. 08-01789 (BRL) 3 4 5 -------------------------------x SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION CORPORATION, Videotaped 6 Plaintiff-Applicant, 7 8 v. BERNARD L. MADOFF INVESTMENT SECURITIES, LLC, Rule 2004 Examination of: MARK PESKIN (Vol. I) 9 10 Defendant. -------------------------------x In Re: 11 BERNARD L. MADOFF, 12 13 Debtor. -------------------------------x 14 15 TRANSCRIPT of testimony as taken by and before 16 MONIQUE VOUTHOURIS, Certified Court Reporter, RPR, 17 CRR and Notary Public of the States of New York and 18 New Jersey, at the offices of Baker & Hostetler, 19 LLP, 45 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York on 20 Thursday, July 29, 2010, commencing at 10:15 a.m. 21 22 23 24 25 BENDISH REPORTING, INC. Litigation Support Services 877.404.2193 www.bendish.com 2 1 A P P E A R A N C E S: 2 3 4 5 BAKER & HOSTETLER, LLP 45 Rockefeller Plaza New York, New York 10111 BY: FERNANDO A. BOHORQUEZ, ESQ. AMANDA E. FEIN, ESQ. For Irving Picard, Trustee 6 7 8 9 DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL, LLP 450 Lexington Avenue New York, NY 10017 BY: DANA M. SESHENS, ESQ. KAREN E. WAGNER, ESQ. For Sterling Equities, certain affiliated entities, and the Witness 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ALSO PRESENT: GREGORY P. NERO, ESQ., Sterling Equities DANIEL McCLUTCHY, Videographer 179 1 2 3 A. This is the SEF lines of credit that we spoke of before. Q. Okay. Did you have any credit 4 facilities with Citibank that had a Madoff account 5 as collateral? 6 7 A. Q. I don't think we did. Okay. 8 A. 9 that was B of A. 10 Q. 11 A. 12 Q. 13 A. No, Bank of America? Yeah, yeah. to Exhibit 6 -- 14 I don't think -- as collateral? 15 16 Q. 19 20 21 22 23 Thank you. So if we go back Yeah. -- under "Liquidity," there is included a Madoff securities and SSP Capital? 17 18 Okay. A. Q. Correct. "SSP Capital" refers to Sterling Stamos? A. Q. Correct. Why did you need to include Madoff in this liquidity analysis? A. Well, I spoke about it before, that 24 the lines of credit required us to have so much 25 liquidity available if the line was called to be 180 1 paid back. 2 3 Q. SEF? 4 5 This is the line of credit for the A. We're only talking about SEF now. Q. 6 Right. A. There were several banks in the -- 7 call it a syndicate of banks that gave us this 8 credit. 9 Citibank -- in this particular case, 10 Citibank asked us to please present in their -- with 11 their definition of liquidity -- with their 12 definition of liquidity a statement as to where we 13 were on a monthly basis or quarterly basis. 14 remember whether it was monthly or quarterly. 15 This indicates June 30th. I can't I know 16 that's a quarter. 17 or July. 18 negotiated. 19 form of accounting. 20 as to what their definition of compliance is. 21 I can't remember if there's a May But this is very formulaic, is very So this doesn't necessarily follow a It is what Citibank agreed on So Madoff was considered liquid 22 because it's a brokerage account. You would call up 23 your broker and say I need my money back, and they 24 would sell securities and readily give it back to 25 you with short notice. It took time to clear 181 1 through the process. 2 But the banks knew that Madoff was a 3 liquid -- you know, a liquid, you know, account and 4 near an equivalent, cash equivalent, because it was 5 short-term notice and easily liquidatable. 6 SSP capital, certain accounts within 7 certain fund investments that we had were more 8 liquid than others. 9 10 I'm not quite sure what the others were, but we had other brokerage accounts. 11 Q. 12 A. Like Prudential or -It was Maxim, it was Long Island 13 Investors, it was a whole bunch of other typical 14 brokerage accounts, no different than the Madoff 15 account, that we would call upon in need of cash if 16 we were in need of cash. 17 basis. 18 Q. So that was the liquidity And let me back up to one thing you 19 mentioned, and we can get two more questions in 20 before -- 21 A. 22 23 24 25 Q. Sure. -- we have to change the tape. What was your understanding of how long -- let me back up. What did Madoff represent to Sterling 186 1 broker who had a great reputation. 2 me am I worried that I had $181 million in JPMorgan. 3 4 5 6 It's like asking I mean, I'm giving it to Citibank. They're not concerned. Q. So that was my follow-up question. Did Citibank ever raise any questions about the -- 7 A. No. To the contrary, I think they 8 were very secure knowing that the money was in a -- 9 a liquid asset. 10 If you also look at the right-hand -- 11 excuse me, the left-hand column, "Fleet margin, 12 Fleet margin, Fleet margin," I mean, all of these 13 Fleet, which is now B of A, was exceedingly secure. 14 They gave us loans supported, collateralized by 15 Madoff. 16 That's how I understand first -- 17 understood Madoff or got comfortable with Madoff, 18 because these double-up loans you talk about, it 19 took me, like, three seconds -- exaggeration -- ten 20 minutes to negotiate them because B of A was so 21 comfortable using Madoff. 22 It wasn't a matter of marking to 23 market. It wasn't a matter of understanding the 24 collateral. 25 in Madoff. Oh, Madoff. Okay, fine, yeah, put it It's going to be liquid. 187 1 2 Q. And why was BOA so comfortable with Madoff? 3 A. B of A, I have to -- you have to ask 4 them. I mean, they had other clients with Madoff. 5 They had other -- I believe other loans, tri-party 6 agreement type loans with Madoff. 7 8 If it was good enough for them, it was sort of good enough for me. 9 10 Q. And then last question on this document -- 11 (Comments off the record.) 12 MR. BOHORQUEZ: 13 break. We'll change tapes. 14 15 Why don't we take a THE VIDEOGRAPHER: record. The time is 2:46. Going off the This ends tape number 3. 16 (Brief recess.) 17 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: 18 record. 19 20 The time is 3:02. We are back on the This is tape number 4. MR. BOHORQUEZ: This is Exhibit No. 7. 21 (Exhibit MP-7 marked for 22 identification.) 23 BY MR. BOHORQUEZ: 24 25 Q. Actually, I'm going to ask you one more question on that and then we'll move on.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?