J.T. Colby & Company, Inc. et al v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 159

DECLARATION of Bonnie L. Jarrett in Support re: 104 MOTION for Summary Judgment.. Document filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3 (REDACTED), # 4 Exhibit 4 (REDACTED), # 5 Tab - Borden Dep, # 6 Tab - Colby 30(b)(6) Dep (REDACTED), # 7 Tab - Colby Dep, # 8 Tab - Freese Dep, # 9 Tab - Goldhor Dep, # 10 Tab - Gundersen Dep, # 11 Tab - Kvamme Dep)(Cendali, Dale)

Download PDF
Page 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 3 4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 5 J.T. COLBY & COMPANY, INC. 6 d/b/a/ BRICK TOWER PRESS, 7 J. BOYLSTON & COMPANY, 8 PUBLISHERS, LLC and 9 IPICTUREBOOKS, LLC, 10 Plaintiffs 11 V. 12 Case No.: APPLE, INC., 13 14 11-CIV4060 Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - x 15 16 Deposition of Richard S. Goldhor, Ph.D. 17 18 Tuesday, January 31, 2012 19 9:58 a.m. 20 21 Goodwin Procter, LLP 22 53 State Street 23 Boston, Massachusetts 24 Reported by: Deborah Roth, RPR/CSR 25 Job # 45894 TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 72 1 agree not to contest Apple's use of ibook for 2 its notebook computer? 3 4 5 MS. RAY: Objection to form. Lack of foundation. A. That's my layperson's understanding of 6 what was going on. 7 if -- without that jointly-signed affidavit, 8 that Apple would have had trouble getting 9 their registration, getting their trademark 10 registered. 11 12 My understanding is that MS. SHEEHAN: Mark this as Goldhor 20. 13 (GOLDHOR EXHIBIT NO. 20 MARKED) 14 Q. Do you recognize this document? 15 A. Without reading through it in detail, 16 but this looks like the consent agreement, the 17 agreement that Apple and Family Systems 18 signed. 19 Yeah, Lawrence Wertheimer is the 20 person whose name -- he lived in New York and 21 he was the director of Family Systems. 22 Q. Pointing your attention on Page 1 -- 23 A. Uh-huh. 24 Q. -- to the description in Paragraph 2 of 25 the Family Systems use of the mark ibook -TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 73 1 A. Uh-huh. 2 Q. -- is this an accurate description, 3 4 GOLDHOR based on your understanding? A. "Computer software used to support and 5 create interactive, user modifiable, 6 electronic books and related goods and 7 services." 8 9 10 11 Q. Yes. And based on your knowledge, Family Systems never expanded its use of the mark ibook from what is described here? A. 12 As far as I know -MS. RAY: 13 foundation. 14 Objection. Lack of speculation. 15 A. Objection to form. Calls for As far as I know, during the time that 16 I was working for Family Systems, everything 17 that we did with the mark falls comfortably 18 under this description. 19 Q. Were you involved at all with Family 20 Systems' assignment of its trademark 21 registration to Apple? 22 23 24 25 A. The complete assignment, no involvement whatsoever. Q. Have you spoken to Brian Reynolds about it? TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580 Page 80 1 Q. Assuming they had downloaded the 2 software and agreed to the terms associated 3 with the software, and then had it loaded onto 4 some kind of device. 5 A. That's correct, with one caveat. I 6 don't know how important it is, but Brian 7 really strove to put in a requirement that it 8 only be used for material that would advance 9 the common good or something like that. He 10 had language that might appear very 11 idealistic, but he was quite serious about it. 12 And so that was -- that limitation on the type 13 of material would have been the only 14 limitation. 15 Q. So that in terms of the subject matter, 16 it sounds like of the content he had hopes for 17 what it would be used for? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. And you said that the ibooks 20 technology -- excuse me, ibook technology, 21 including the ibook software, could be used to 22 support and create user-modifiable electronic 23 books, correct? 24 A. Yes. 25 Q. Is it fair to say that a user could TSG Reporting - Worldwide 877-702-9580

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?