Unites States of America v. Apple, Inc. et al
Filing
358
MOTION for Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8809526. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Apple, Inc., Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Orin Snyder, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 1:11-md-02293-DLC, 1:12-cv-02826-DLC(Snyder, Orin)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
-------------------------------------x
:
IN RE ELECTRONIC BOOKS ANTITRUST
: No. 11 MD 2293 (DLC)
LITIGATION
:
-------------------------------------x
-------------------------------------x
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
No. 12 Civ. 2826 (DLC)
:
:
APPLE, INC.,
:
:
Defendant.
:
-------------------------------------x
-------------------------------------x
:
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
:
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, et al.,
:
:
Plaintiffs,
:
:
v.
:
: No. 12 Civ. 03394 (DLC)
PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC., et al.,
:
:
Defendants.
:
-------------------------------------x
NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, upon the declaration submitted herewith, Defendant
Apple Inc. by its undersigned attorney, will move this Court, in the Courtroom of the Honorable
Denise L. Cote, United States District Judge, United States Courthouse, 500 Pearl Street,
Courtroom 15B, New York, New York, at a time and date to be determined by this Court, for an
Order admitting Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr. pro hac vice pursuant to Rule 1.3(c) of the Local Civil
Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. A proposed
order is annexed hereto.
Dated: New York, New York
August 22, 2013
Respectfully submitted,
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
By:__s/ Orin Snyder
Orin Snyder
200 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10166-0193
Telephone: (212) 351-4000
Facsimile: (212) 351-4035
osnyder@gibsondunn.com
Attorney for Defendant Apple Inc.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?