Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 179

DECLARATION signed by Dean Boland re 176 Response in Opposition to Motion, 177 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion, 178 Affidavit in Support of Motion filed by Paul D. Ceglia. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Boland, Dean)

Download PDF
Connors & Vilardo, LLP Description of Document Street Fax List of Products and Services Street Fax List of Products and Services; Street Fax Sales Representative Potential Customers for Region Photograph Additions to Street Fax “Photobase” in Florida Street Fax Confidential Private Placement Memorandum Street Fax List of Products Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated September 22, 2003 Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated September 2, 2003 Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated December 19, 2003 Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated February 16, 2004 Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated August 29, 2003 Type of Document PDF PDF Privilege Claimed None None PDF None PDF None PDF PDF None None PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None EXHIBIT A Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated August 28, 2003 Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and paulceglia@msn.com, dated June 19, 2003 Scan of printed email between mzuckerb@fas.harvard.edu and kpmonsterus@yahoo.com, dated September 22, 2003 Unexecuted Unanimous Written Consent in Lieu of First Meeting of the Board of Directors of US Data Basics, Inc. Action by Written Consent of the Incorporator of US Data Basics, Inc., signed by Jack Berberian, dated June 5, 2002 Unexecuted StreetDelivery.com, Inc. Promissory Note Unexecuted StreetDelivery.com Loan Agreement Memorandum of Understanding from StreetDelivery.com, Inc. v. U.S. Data Basics, Inc. and Paul Ceglia et al. (Civ. No. 03-10590, D. Mass. 2003) StreetDelivery.com, Inc. Independent Contractor Agreement with no indication of execution PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None PDF None Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Firedman LLP Description of Document Type of Document EXHIBIT A Privilege Claimed Portion of Lawsuit Overview PDF Work Product Privilege/Attorney-client Privilege (N.Y. C.P.L.R. 4503) and see submitted memorandum to the court. Unredacted portions already submitted to Defendants. In accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(5)(A)(ii) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(e)(1)(A) the description of the content of the redacted pages is as follows: Attorney client communication and attorney analysis derived from that communication along with strategy considerations and an analysis of facts in this case used in the past by Mr. Ceglia for consideration of retention of additional counsel. Edelson McGuire, LLP Description of Document Multiple enhanced scans of portions of “‘Work for Hire’ Contract” executed by Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg, dated April 28, 2003 Multiple Powerpoints of portions of “‘Work for Hire’ Contract” executed by Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg, dated April 28, 2003 Type of Document PDF Privilege Claimed None Powerpoint None Speckin Forensic Laboratories EXHIBIT A Description of Document Multiple enhanced scans of portions of “‘Work for Hire’ Contract” executed by Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg, dated April 28, 2003 Type of Document PDF Privilege Claimed None Stewart Forensic Consultants, LLC Description of Document Multiple enhanced scans of portions of “‘Work for Hire’ Contract” executed by Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg, dated April 28, 2003 Type of Document TIFF Privilege Claimed None For every document where the “Privilege Claimed” column says “none” Stroz Friedberg has been directed to release those documents to Defendants. THIS PRIVILEGE LOG SUPERSEDES THE PRIOR PRIVILEGE LOG THAT WAS DOC. NO. 156-2 EXHIBIT A

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?