Ceglia v. Zuckerberg et al

Filing 296

DECLARATION signed by Alexander H. Southwell re 294 Fifth MOTION to Compel and For Other Relief filed by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg, Facebook, Inc. filed by Mark Elliot Zuckerberg, Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Snyder, Orin)

Download PDF
EXHIBIT C Ex. A # 334 Description of Relevant Materials Privilege Claim, if Any December 4, 2010 email from paulceglia@gmail.com to paul.argentieri@gmail.com with Attorney client subject "Re: letter" discussing, among communication other things, a hushmail account. Privileged. 360 First attachment to February 24, 2011 email from jceglia92@gmail.com to paulceglia@gmail.com with subject "Summaries". Document concerning Paul Argentieri's summary of Paul Ceglia's action. February 15, 2007 email from jkole@atg.state.il.us to paulceglia@msn.com and CC'ed to awornhoff@sidley.com with subject "FW: Paul D. Ceglia". March 17, 2011 email from paulceglia@gmail.com to jason.holmberg@papellets.com with subject "file for DLA" with two files attached. 373 December 12, 2010 email from jwg@connors-vilardo.com to davegrable@quinnemanuel.com and ems@connors-vilardo.com and CC'ed Attorney client to paulceglia@gmail.com with subject communication "FW: Zuck signature". Privileged. 379 April 19, 2011 email from paul.argentieri@gmail.com to paulceglia@gmail.com with subject "Fwd: Follow-up" containing emails with Kcross@lippes.com, AMarks@kasowitz.com, Jerry.Trippitelli@dlapiper.com, and jason.holmberg@papellets.com with attachments. 337 348 Attorney Work Product, Case Analysis provided to client. Attorney client communication Privileged. Attorney client communication with Attorney's agent Privileged. Attorney client communication Privileged. 400 December 2, 2010 email from jwg@connors-vilardo.com to paulceglia@gmail.com and davegrable@quinnemanuel.com and Attorney client CC'ed to ems@connors-vilardo.com communication with subject "RE: Zuck signature". Privileged. 402 December 8, 2010 email from paulceglia@gmail.com to davegrable@quinnemanuel.com with subject "Re: Zuck signature". December 8, 2010 email from davegrable@quinnemanuel.com to paulceglia@gmail.com with subject "RE: Zuck signature". 403 December 17, 2010 email from paulceglia@gmail.com to Attorney client davegrable@quinnemanuel.com with communication subject "Re: Zuck signature". Privileged. 405 December 2, 2010 email from jwg@connors-vilardo.com to paul.argentieri@gmail.com and CC'ed to paulceglia@gmail.com and Attorney client davegrable@quinnemanuel.com with communication subject "Zuck signature". Privileged. 401 Attorney client communication Privileged. Attorney client communication Privileged. Ex. B From: Dean Boland Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 10:58:41 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) To: Southwell, Alexander; Paul Argentieri Subject: Supplemental Declaration Request from Defendants regarding Mr. Holmberg Alex: Mr. Ceglia has no personal knowledge regarding what files Jason Holmberg has retained or is retaining regarding this matter. Moreover, those files have been produced to Stroz Friedberg after your communication. Mr. Ceglia could not produce a declaration "from personal knowledge" as declarations appear to require, regarding this issue. If you are seeking a declaration that is not from Mr. Ceglia's personal knowledge, i.e. restates hearsay he has been provided about Mr. Holmberg's file retention, please advise and we will consider it. Dean. -Dean Boland Owner/Member Boland Legal, LLC 18123 Sloane Avenue Lakewood, Ohio 44107 216.236.8080 ph 866.455.1267 fax dean@bolandlegal.com Please note, I typically only review my emails once daily. If there is something urgent in any email, please do not hesitate to contact my office at 216-236-8080. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?