MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
Filing
279
REPLY, filed by Defendant DUKE UNIVERSITY, to Response to #271 MOTION for Protective Order on Confidentiality and Prospective Sealing Order filed by DUKE UNIVERSITY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A- Email from Wells to Ekstrand, #2 Exhibit B- Email from Ekstrand to Ellis, #3 Exhibit C- Email from Wells to Ekstrand, #4 Exhibit D- Email from Sun to Ekstrand, #5 Exhibit E- Email from Sun to Ekstrand, #6 Exhibit F- Letter from Smith to Segars dated May 3, 2012)(SUN, PAUL)
([KLELW (
)URP
6HQW
7R
&F
6XEMHFW
$WWDFKPHQWV
3DXO 6XQ
)ULGD\ 0DUFK 30
5REHUW (NVWUDQG
6WHIDQLH 6PLWK
'L[LH :HOOV
): 0F)DG\HQ Y 'XNH 3URSRVHG 3URWHFWLYH 2UGHU
5$/ Y0F)DG\HQB3URSRVHGB6WLSXODWHGB3URWHFWLYHB2UGHUB'2&;
'HDU %RE DQG 6WHIDQLH ±
:H KDYH FDUHIXOO\ FRQVLGHUHG WKH FKDQJHV WKDW \RX SURSRVHG WR WKH VWLSXODWHG SURWHFWLYH RUGHU
HQWHUHG LQ WKH &DUULQJWRQ FDVH DV ZHOO DV WKH SRLQWV WKDW \RX PDGH GXULQJ RXU WHOHSKRQH
FRQYHUVDWLRQ RQ )HEUXDU\ :H DUH DEOH WR DJUHH WR VRPH RI WKH FKDQJHV WKDW \RX KDYH SURSRVHG
EXW DV GLVFXVVHG EHORZ ZH DUH QRW DEOH WR DJUHH WR RWKHU FKDQJHV WKDW \RX KDYH
SURSRVHG $WWDFKHG LV D UHGOLQHG GRFXPHQWV VKRZLQJ WKH FKDQJHV WR ZKLFK ZH DUH DEOH WR
DJUHH $V LW VHHPV WKDW ZH ZLOO QRW EH DEOH WR UHDFK DJUHHPHQW RQ WKH WHUPV RI VXFK DQ RUGHU LW LV
RXU SODQ WR ILOH D PRWLRQ ZLWK WKH FRXUW RQ 7XHVGD\ 0DUFK UHTXHVWLQJ WKDW WKH FRXUW HQWHU D
SURWHFWLYH RUGHU WKDW ZRXOG FRQWDLQ WKH WHUPV VHW IRUWK LQ WKH DWWDFKHG GRFXPHQW
:KDW IROORZV LV RXU SRVLWLRQ ZLWK UHJDUG WR WKH VSHFLILF FKDQJHV WKDW \RX KDYH SURSRVHG
,Q SDUDJUDSK WKH &DUULQJWRQ RUGHU SURYLGHV WKDW DQ\RQH ZKR ZDQWV DFFHVV WR
FRQILGHQWLDO LQIRUPDWLRQ PXVW H[HFXWH ([KLELW $ ± ZKLFK LV DQ $JUHHPHQW &RQFHUQLQJ
3URWHFWLYH ,QIRUPDWLRQ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?