Fitrakis v. Husted et al
Filing
3
MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff Robert J Fitrakis. [ELECTION ISSUE(S) CITED] (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Affidavit, # 7 Attachment 1, # 8 Attachment 2, # 9 Attachment 3, # 10 Attachment 4, # 11 Attachment 5) (jcw1)
The Free Press confirms installation, secret justification of uncertified last minute election
tabulation reporting software in Ohio
by Gerry Bello and Bob Fitrakis
November 2, 2012
The Free Press has obtained internal memos from the senior staff of the Ohio Secretary of State's
office confirming the installation of untested and uncertified election tabulation software.
Yesterday, the Free Press reported that "experimental" software patches were installed on ES&S
voting machines in 39 Ohio counties. (see Will "experimental" software patches affect the Ohio
vote?).
Election Counsel Brandi Laser Seske circulated a memo dated November 1st renewing the
already shaky justification for installing software made by Election Systems and Solutions on
vote tabulation equipment used in 39 Ohio counties. The letter to Ohio Secretary of State
personnel Matt Masterson, Danielle Sellars, Myra Hawkins, Betsy Schuster, and Ohio's Director
of Elections Matthew Damschroder, clarified the dubious justification for not complying with the
legal requirements for the examination of all election related equipment.
Seske begins by explaining what she purports to be the purpose of the software patch: "Its
function is to aid in the reporting of results that are already uploaded into the county's system.
The software formats results that have already been uploaded by the county into a format that can
be read by the Secretary of State's election night reporting system."
According to the contract between the Ohio Secretary of State's office and ES&S, this last minute
"experimental" software update will supposedly transmit custom election night reports to the
Secretary of State's office from the county boards of elections, bypassing the normal election
night reporting methods.
In order to justify this unusual parallel reporting method, Seske explains "It is not part of the
certified Unity system, so it did not require federal testing." This attempt to skirt federal and state
law from one of the most partisan Secretary of State offices in the nation ignores basic facts of
how modern information systems function.
Seske continues "Because the software is not 1) involved in the tabulation or casting of ballots
(or in communicating between systems involved in the tabulation or casting of ballots) or 2) a
modification to a certified system, the BVME [Board of Voting Machine Examiners] was not
required to review the software." These claims are factually unsound. The software, although not
communicating actual ballot information, facilitates communication between systems upon
which votes are tabulated and stored. Although the software purports to not modify the tabulation
system software, it is itself a modification to the whole tabulation system. This is why
certification and testing is required in all cases.
Just as in 2004, the Ohio Secretary of State's office has enabled the possibility of a "man in the
middle" attack. This software, functioning on a network through which votes are transmitted
could act to intercept, alter or destroy votes from counties where it is not even installed, hence
the "man in the middle" nickname.
On September 19, the last minute contract between ES&S and the Ohio Secretary of State's
office was inked. Within a week, Seske wrote "He [Matt Masterson] has reviewed and approved
the changes." Masterson is the Deputy Director of Elections. After Masterson's approval, Seske
acted to bypass the Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners required review.
"Pursuant to the board's policy, each change will be approved unless three members of the
BVME request a meeting to review a change within 15 days of today's date. Given the
proximately of the upcoming election, please let me know as soon as possible whether you will
be requesting a meeting to review the changes," wrote Seske.
Government reports such as Ohio's Everest study document that any single change to the system
could corrupt the whole voting process.
An unelected, partisan group of attorneys appears to have conspired to install election software
without testing and certification that they are professionally unqualified to pass judgment upon.
These types of last minute installations of software patches on voting machines are considered
suspect by knowledgeable and experienced election protection attorneys, in light of all the voting
machine irregularities exposed during the 2004 election in Ohio.
------------------Gerry Bello is the chief researcher at the Columbus Free Press. He holds a degree in computer
security from Antioch College. Bob Fitrakis is the Editor of the Free Press. He holds Ph.D. in
Political Science and a J.D. from the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?